Saturday, March 31, 2012

Rom- Alama - Obama - Ding -Dong! Better Off Than Four Years Ago?



Are you better off today than you were four years ago?

This is a Presidential election year. We, the people, are evaluating the candidates as the primaries and caucuses continue. It seems evident that the majority of the votes cast to determine the leader of the free world for the next four years will be divided between President Obama and GOP candidate Mitt Romney. Although many in the country agree that neither of these two men represent ideal nominees, they likely will represent the "best" offerings of the Democrats and the Republicans.

Now, most of us see ourselves as typical Americans, those most at risk of suffering the bad decisions carried out by the Executive Branch. So, naturally, the common people, the average Joes, the middle class, the so-called "backbone of the nation" debate which man, if elected, will initiate change and pursue the best policies to make life in the United States more palatable. We expect our President to act in our best interests and actively support our standards of good government and good living.

Our vote seems to hinge on examining the past and the future. President Obama has served for four years; therefore, we judge his performance in terms of his past promises and his past accomplishments during his tenure. On the other hand, we speculate about the "kind of President" Mitt Romney may be. Romney represents the GOP's "future" hope for improved leadership. Or, considering another outcome of electing a President Romney, the man could orchestrate policies that become worse than the worst under an Obama-led America.

In any case, negatives always outweigh positives. We typical Americans want to know how much more suffering we must endure at the hands of our President. In large, we don't consider any good achievements of a President, unless these achievements directly affect us, our families, and our pocketbooks. So, the age-old election question that echoes through the land when an incumbent seeks a second term as President is the following:

"Are you better off today than you were four years ago?




Is This a Loaded Question?

First of all, I'm not sure I know what the question means in terms of my personal experience. For one thing, I am four years older than I was in 2008. I must confess, when you reach 61, aging, in itself, isn't good news. And, included in this obvious toll of four more years of aging, I have to admit my memory has diminished with time.

So, friends, I really can't remember just exactly how "good off" I was in 2008. Hell, I often can't remember everything I had intended to buy when I walk through the doors of the local supermarket. I must confess my aging and my memory will probably not be affected by Obama or by Romney.

I am quite sure many people ask the question and want me to answer "no" and support this answer by saying I am paying more for gas now than I did four years ago. And, I can't deny that -- GasBuddy data tells me the average price per gallon in the U.S. in 2008 was $3.24 compared to projections of $4.25 or even $5.00 a gallon in 2012.

No matter who or what is to blame -- inflation, oil companies, foreign oil cartels, local distributors, the President -- I have solved the oil crisis. I drive much less in 2012 than I drove in 2008. Plain and simple math here: I have made a major personal budget cut in the category of "Travel Expenses." Even large, old V-eights like the motor in my '93 Cadillac get excellent mileage while sitting still.

And, now many of you are going to say, "But, my work or business requires I spend money on fueling my vehicle(s). I have no choice but to pay the outrageous prices."  Would it surprise you to know that people in Italy are currently paying $8.67 a gallon, and the English are paying nearly $10.00 a gallon? Nothing in the free world is free whether you eat hot dogs, spaghetti, or fish and chips.

Face it, folks, we Americans are overly dependent on our immediate means of transportation, and we demand traveling wherever and whenever we desire. Again, my age plays a large part in my "better off" status concerning gasoline prices. With the onset of retirement and living on a fixed income, fantastic extravagances of wanderlust such as long road trips and cross country vacations have become simple TV realities of watching programs about excursions and expeditions on the Travel Channel and the National Geographic Network.

Another consideration for answering the question would naturally involve the amount of money I have readily available. So as not to rehash the effect of being on a fixed income, I will not get into a long diatribe about the necessity of making adjustments. And, I can verify that my money is scarce; however, I am quite sure I was not more financially secure in 2008. Large amounts of cash on hand is not what makes me feel "better off" anyway. If it did, I would definitely not be sitting here writing a blog for my entertainment.

Yes, if I now lacked the necessities of food, shelter and security, I would certainly answer differently. Yet, I believe most who complain about their lack of money believe they require more material possessions and adult "toys" for the fulfillment of their American Dream.

My mother lived through the Great Depression. In order to survive, her generation developed unbelievable skills and incredible ingenuity in those desperate times. She tells me about "poor days" and "family dependence" and "scrambling for necessities." She is a member of the so-called Greatest Generation, and they didn't become steeled individuals by allowing misfortune to rule their lives.

In 2012, we are undoubtedly living in "hard times" concerning jobs and the economy, but I feel that many people are unwilling to initiate the effort and to develop the intestinal fortitude to move forward. In most cases, the required personal efforts of needy individuals must take precedence over the legislated role of the government in terms of helping them weather poor conditions and assuring their goals  -- be they educational, financial, or job related goals.

The self-motivated, determined souls will surely find they are "better off" if they have been actively working toward their dreams during the last four years. Some of these incredible diehards may not even care who was President from 2009-2012 because they have been just too damned busy helping themselves to let politics play a part. The indomitable human spirits of those who rise to confront difficult circumstances ultimately defeat these bad times.

Am I "better off" now? I guess my qualitative scales are not working too well. To me, politicians and government are secondary to my "good, better, best" conditions. With all of the partisan political haggling and arguing, I am skeptical of the government's ability to make me "better off." It is easy to understand why most of us see elections and candidates in negative terms. Many, instead of serving the public, hold office to wear the badge of office that allows them the personal perks to financial and societal "success."

Many prejudiced voters trust and distrust others strictly along party lines, and most politicians make deals to benefit the lobbyists and constituents that are most vital to their big money campaigns. I am very discouraged with the inability of our elected officials to compromise by working through problems and finding solutions for the good of the common people.

No politician or party should be "an island to oneself." No politician or party should make their most important accomplishment merely being elected or being re-elected.

Since no one asking me the question "Are you better off today than you were four years ago?" really has the correct answer for ME, I think any consideration of an answer would be pretty much wasted time. I understand by the tone inherent in the question that the inquisitor is attempting to make me open my mouth, then force HIS or HER opinion down my old esophagus. And, truly, the things I use to judge my state of satisfaction are not going to be addressed by Obama, by Romney, or by any of the cronies of these high-ranking officials.

I guess if I must attempt to answer the question, I would begin by verbalizing my beliefs in love, forgiveness, cooperation, tolerance, mutual respect, diversity, and rock music -- things only people in intimate contact with others can truly understand. I value these things: being with friends who realize and care about our differences; enjoying good times with my healthy family; awaking each new day and being able to move, talk and feel; drinking a cold beverage or two while relaxing to good music; and preserving all vestiges of love I can still possess and express.


Better off? Four years? Obama or Romney? Give me a break. Get off of my ass with your silly personal concerns and party lines. I was fortunate enough to be born in the greatest county on earth, a place that allows me to express disdain and praise for everything. Right now Washington, D.C. is so far away from my heart that the cost of a politician's trip to my aorta would far exceed the limits of his taxpayer-funded expense allowances. And, uh.. oh my, did you hear that gas was going up to $5.00 a gallon this summer? What am I going to do?



Thursday, March 29, 2012

Stealth Drinking From a Red Solo Cup at High School Tailgates




Red Solo Cup by Toby Keith

"Now a red solo cup is the best receptacle
For barbecues, tailgates, fairs and festivals
And you, sir, do not have a pair of testicles
If you prefer drinking from glass

"A red solo cup is cheap and disposable
And in 14 years they are decomposable
And unlike my home, they are not foreclosable
Freddie-Mac can kiss my ass. Woo!

"Red solo cup, I fill you up
Let's have a party, let's have a party
I love you red solo cup, I lift you up
Proceed to party, proceed to party"


These lyrics from an insanely popular Toby Keith song are a little risque, off the wall and demonstrative of the fact that writers can pen a song about any subject. Two sets of brothers wrote the viral hit: Jim Beavers and his brother, Brett, and the Warren Brothers  (Brett and Brad Warren).

Keith, himself, admits,"It is the stupidest song I ever heard in my life, but it's so stupid it's good." And "good" for Toby is an understatement -- the YouTube video surpassed 13 million views; the song was certified platinum with sales and shipments over 1,000,000 copies; and it peaked at #9 on the Billboard Country Songs Chart (#15 on the Billboard Top 100).

Keith calls "Red Solo Cup" a Roger Miller-esque song that is played on the radio despite its FCC questionable reference to "testicles. He admits he wasn't sure about releasing the humorous song, but as he began to play it for people, he noticed them singing along almost immediately.

So, Toby filmed an off-the-wall video frat party for "Red Solo Cup," inviting a crew of celebrity friends to join him in the clip, including TV host Craig Ferguson, baseball great Roger Clemens, basketball icon Larry Bird, and fellow music stars Sammy Hagar, Ted Nugent, Eric Church, Joe Nichols, JT Hodges, Carter's Chord, Rose Falcon and Trailer Choir's Butter, among others.

Other than the obvious consumer connection to the popular cup made by Solo and being sold to Dart Container Company ($315 million in cash and agreeing to assume about $700 million of Solo's debt), the song stresses the necessity of partying with the "only" cup worthy of  attracting women (writing your first name on the cup) and attractively consuming mass quantities of beer while partying at public outings (used also for drinking games like Beer Pong). That is, if you have the "testicles" to use a red Solo cup. And, even then, be sure the color is red, not blue or yellow, to coincide with the manly "fruit to your loom."

Keith adds, "'Red Solo Cup' is like a squirrel loose in a church house. We can play it in an office and then play five other songs, give it an hour, walk out and you'd hear the receptionist singing it. It's like nursery rhyme stupid."

Goofy popular songs are not new by any means. For decades, Dr. Demento has hosted a weekly two-hour radio festival of "mad music and crazy comedy" heard on stations coast to coast. "Witch Doctor," "They're Coming To Take Me Away," and "Dead Puppies" are among the thousands of "different" Demento offerings. I believe comedy songs and nutty lyrics are fun and offer a needed release from the small stream of more serious music offered by most radio stations.




The Red Solo Concealment

Not too long ago the popular, spirited college and pro picnicking events know as tailgates began to gain popularity before high school football games. Now, many area high school students, their parents, and friends are participating in these pregame activities. Although some of the tailgates occur at private homes, others are sanctioned by the school districts in order that fans can show their school spirit on parking lots adjacent to their stadiums and fields.

Of course, showing school spirit and actively supporting a sports team are admirable qualities for a fan base -- that is, as long as a spirit of good sportsmanship is observed by all, and the tailgate activities do not allow fans to break the rules high schools have set for school events.

Lately, the obvious concern of many is the reality of people drinking at high school tailgates. Not only does drinking alcohol increase the potential for altercations and rude behaviors, but also drinking on school property creates a negative modeling situation.

As young people observe their role models -- parents, relatives, and older acquaintances -- drinking, they comprehend that their loved ones can and will put their personal desires above school regulations. In essence, a student who observes adults drinking on school grounds understands that drinking, even at school, is a sanctioned, even encouraged adult activity.

Not only that, but an adult who has been drinking at school represents a powerful, familiar embodiment for students, themselves, to drink and drive. Underage drinking is a very serious problem as it is.

Terrible tragedies could result from tailgate drinking. Intoxicated adults may attempt to drive home after the game. The results could be deadly: The driver may die and kill other innocent people. Does the school assume any responsibility for such accidents? If they let drinking occur on school grounds should they? Food for thought.

Now, the basic ties to me between Toby Keith's macho, drinking and partying "Red Solo Cup" hit song and high school tailgating are twofold:

1. "Red Solo Cup" is marketed almost exclusively to high schoolers and young adults with a stamp of alcohol approval: "proceed to party." "Party" means drinking. The "cup" is a vessel for drinking at social events.

"Now I really love how you're easy to stack
But I really hate how you're easy to crack
Cuz when beer runs down in front of my pack
Well that my friends is quite yucky"

2. "Red Solo Cup" is a song with lyrics (unfortunately taken as serious by juvenile minds)  in support of cleverly concealing drinking at public events. It connotates that deception is fine and paramount to anyone wishing to break the rules. This is not the kind of thing to teach a young student.

"Red solo cup, you're more than just plastic
You're more than amazing you're more than fantastic
And believe me that I'm not the least bit sarcastic
When i look at you and say:

"'Red solo cup, you're not just a cup. (No, no, God no!)
You're my, you're my (friend?) friend. (life long!)
Thank you for being my friend.'"

Listen, people, I taught public high school for 27 years. Let me assure you, high school students know about the things adults think they hide from the younger generation. In fact, they constantly search for these little hypocritical behaviors, use them in arguments against their "two-faced" parents and school, spread the denials to the entire school population, and can't wait to model the behaviors , themselves. 

I guess I'm picking on one song and one manufacterer of picnic products out of many because of that damned cup. It is a symbol of deceit. I have even heard rumors that schools let tailgate drinking go without enforcing rules as long as the fans' alcohol is concealed --  not in a can or in a bottle but in a plastic cup.

If you are an adult fan, even a young graduate of drinking age full of "piss and vinegar," do not drink at a high school tailgate party. Enjoy the food, activities, and social company, but forego the booze. Likewise, if you are a school district in denial that drinking occurs or a school district practicing indifference to drinking as long as it doesn't cause a major concern, stiffen up and fix your problem.


Or, I think you will eventually feel the negative repurcussions of "Red Solo Cup":



"Let's have a party, proceed to party
Red solo cup! Solo cup!"

Wednesday, March 28, 2012

Black Man Packing Heat



"There is a black man with a gun."

What is your first judgment of this statement? Please, be honest.

Did you make an inferential leap that involved negativity? I imagine many people assumed the fictional black man must be a hoodlum, a gangster, a criminal -- someone armed and willing to commit an offensive act of violence. After all, the racial composition of the U.S. population (2008) was 12.84% African American, while the U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) showed non-Hispani blacks accounted for 39.4% of the prison and jail population. Such disparities breed stereotypes. Black men, especially young black men, are often presumed to be criminal wrongdoers who are stereotyped as violent, aggressive, and up to no good.

These anxieties reflect not only anecdote and personal experience. Social-science research has documented the unfavorable stereotypes associated with young black men. Studies have found, for example, that research participants are more likely to mistake a cellphone for a gun when it is held by a black man than by a white one. The combination of being black and male can sometimes cause people to perceive a threat even when there isn’t one.

(James Brockmole, "What Does This New Study Reveal About Those Packing Heat?" The Blaze, http://www.theblaze.com/stories/what-does-this-new-study-reveal-about-those-packing-heat/, March 20 2012)


Now consider these statistics from the National Center for Victims of Crimes. In 2010, for homicides in which the type of weapon was specified, 68 percent of the offenses were committed with firearms.


In that year, 46.5 percent of homicide victims were white and 49.8 percent were black. For 3.7 percent of victims, race was classified as :other" or "unknown." And, homicide was generally intra-racial where the race of the victim and offender were known: white offenders murdered 83 percent of white victims, and black offenders murdered 90 percent of black victims.

We all understand the plea of the NRA, who bills itself as America's foremost defender of the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms, that guns are essential for self protection. It seems pretty evident that the minority of black men in this country must be given the same rights as the majority. In fact, blacks in this nation have been the predominant victims of domestic terror under government sanction, or senseless criminal activity by young men who share their skin color.

I ask you,
if you do have a negative connotation
of a black man with a gun permit, why?
Are you, perhaps, discovering one
of those subtle, less discernible prejudices?

The new face of gun rights in America is an elderly black man who wants to protect his family and his private property, earned through decades of hard work and sacrifice. His is an American story about the individual defense of liberty and property, the core purpose of the Second Amendment.

America’s gun-control laws owe their genesis to the post-Civil War era, when white southerners moved to disarm freed slaves. The former Confederate states’ successful efforts to restrict gun ownership had disastrous long-term consequences for black Americans’ life, liberty and pursuit of happiness. At last, in the 21st century, things are beginning to change but not without resistance.

Ron Miller, conservative writer and commentator, says, "It takes a lot of courage for black people to stand up and demand gun ownership as a fundamental right of American citizenship. Frankly, white people have been taught through the media and the arts to fear black people with guns, and gun control is most prevalent in urban areas with large black and minority populations." (Ron Miller, "Blacks With Guns," Gun Owners of America, http://gunowners.org/op03302011.htm, March 29 2011)

Black people have been indoctrinated to believe that gun control is for their own good when, in fact, it simply makes them easier targets. Whether it's the Ku Klux Klan in the 1900s, or the "boyz n the hood" in 2010, the effect of disarming their victims is the same - death, serious injury, or fear and intimidation if you're allowed to live.

Testimony of a Black Gun Owner

 David J. Miller writes:

"You wouldn't know it to look at me. Most people see an unarmed, 37-year-old, bearded white male; but I assure you that I am a Black Man with a Gun.

"I borrowed this title from a man named Kenneth Blanchard; the original Black Man With a Gun. He is, in his own words, '...an American of African ancestry,' and he's not shy about the fact that he's a conservative Christian gun owner too.

"People in society today seem to tense up when they hear the words, "black man" and "gun" in a sentence. This is because of the incorrect yet popular belief that most black men with guns are criminals. Blanchard works to shatter that stereotype through speaking engagements, shooting camps, training classes, essays and books. His primary focus is to break through the barriers of race that society foists upon us.

"It is not an easy task. Many black men are reluctant to stand up and be counted among mainstream (read: white) gun owners. They prefer to keep their gun ownership private. This reluctance is a manifestation of the race barrier that has been constructed and used to keep gun owners of different races separated and, therefore, weakened. If we, as freedom-loving gun owners are to successfully regain and retain our rights, we must *all* stick together. White, black or brown, male or female, suburban, rural or urban; it makes no difference. In the words of Benjamin Franklin, 'We must all hang together, or assuredly we shall all hang separately.'"

(David J. Miller, "Black Man With A Gun," TheBluesMan@KeepAndBearArms.com, February 7 2003)

Ali wearing a hoodie. Stereotype?

Supreme Court Ruling


A very significance Supreme Court ruling on June 28, 2010 effectively struck down gun bans nationwide as unconstitutional. The decision resonates in the black community, whose people are more likely than any other group to be murdered by a gun-wielding assailant. That fact made two of the protagonists of McDonald v. City of Chicago particularly compelling.

The lead plaintiff in the suit which challenged the city of Chicago's handgun ban was a 76-year old black grandfather who grew tired of being fearful in his own neighborhood. After multiple break-ins at his home and death threats because he called the police to report gunfire, U.S. Army veteran and retired maintenance worker Otis McDonald wanted a handgun to defend himself, his family and his property:

"I just got the feeling that I'm on my own...The fact is that so many people my age have worked hard all their life, getting a nice place for themselves to live in ... and having one (handgun) would make us feel a lot more comfortable."

Because he is a hunter, Mr. McDonald already had two shotguns in his home but said, "I would like to have a handgun so I could keep it right by my bed, just in case somebody might want to come in my house."

(Ron Miller, "Blacks With Guns," Gun Owners of America, http://gunowners.org/op03302011.htm, March 29 2011)

Gun-control advocates often cite the gun violence in urban areas, and the alarming murder rate among black people, especially young black males, as justification for gun bans. It is harder, however, for them to claim they are helping black people when they continue to die anyway because the criminals obtain guns regardless of the law, and law-abiding citizens are effectively disarmed by the government that is sworn to keep them safe.

Mr. McDonald knows he cannot depend on the police to defend him or his home, so he declares, "That's all I want, is just a fighting chance. Give me the opportunity to at least make somebody think about something before they come in my house on me."

However, Not So Fast There, Black Man With a Gun

Chicago’s Mayor Richard Daley signed handgun-licensing legislation that violates both the spirit and the letter of the McDonald decision - with the unanimous support of the Democrat-controlled City Council.

Robert Farago of The Washington Times reports, "The Chicago handgun-licensing laws enacted just four days after the Supreme Court ruling include four hours of mandatory training and testing (at the prospective handgun owner’s expense), tri-annual licensing fees and registration with the Chicago Police. (That’s in addition to existing federal requirements.) The new regulations prohibit gun ranges within Chicago; applicants will have to travel outside the city for training.

(Robert Farago, "Racist Pols Go Straight Back To Disarming Blacks," The Washington Times, http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/jul/6/racist-pols-go-straight-back-to-disarming-blacks/?page=all, July 6 2010)

Do the new requirements pass the “reasonable” test suggested by the Supreme Court  in the McDonald decision?  The mayor has made no secret of the fact that the laws reflect his desire to make handgun ownership as difficult as possible. For whom? I'll give you one guess, friends.

While Chicago’s laws will be applied equally, regardless of race, it’s clear that crime-plagued, low-income black Americans will find it hardest to satisfy their requirements. By both intention and design, the city of Chicago will prevent handgun ownership by the municipality’s poorest, least educated and most vulnerable inhabitants.

Won't the vast majority of the new handgun owners be wealthy white residents? Who else can afford $500 in fees, plus the cost of a gun, and the time and effort required to obtain a handgun license?

The McDonald decision didn’t go far enough. The highest court in the land should have mandated that states and cities shall make no laws abridging Americans’ right to bear arms. Instead, they created a “reasonableness” test that opened the door to the same racist regulations that inspired Otis McDonald to seek legal redress in the first place.

Oh my, "There's a black man with a gun." Or is there?


Sunday, March 25, 2012

My Dives Into the Gulf of Depression




"The worst way to have chronic depression
is to have it unconsciously,
to be in a burning rage
and not know you are angry."

 –Les Murray, Killing the Black Dog:
A Memoir of Depression

I feel the need to define something I have experienced many times. To do this definition any justice, I must confess that words typically fall short when a writer tries to convey accurately anything so intimately entwined with emotion. To tell the truth, when I am in the deepest throes of my illness, I try so hard to climb back that I don't dwell on dissecting the problem or understanding the pain that paints my world black. Therefore, I can, at best, offer some personal experience and trust people will more clearly comprehend a condition that I am still battling as a veteran with 30 years of direct contact.



First of all,  I believe the standard medical definition of depression is largely inadequate for expressing the term. Everyone knows that a depressed person is sad for a prolonged period of time. A depressed individual may exhibit many of the same symptoms of clinical depression. The distinction between simply being normally depressed and being clinically depressed is best understood in terms of reactive mechanisms.

Normal (reactive) depression is psychological because a person is emotionally “reacting” to something that has happened. A person suffering normal depression can usually make adjustments and avoid debilitation. But, someone suffering clinical depression experiences symptoms that are triggered by a chemical imbalance in the brain. It is a biological disorder, but it usually has psychological symptoms very similar to reactive depression. In clinical depression, however, the  individual has little, if any, control over emotions and moods.

The clinically depressed person suffers a medical condition so severe that it is considered abnormal. Clinical depression can be caused by a reaction to unfortunate life circumstances, or it can be caused by no obvious reason. The mental disease is often described by its symptoms --these usually consist of feelings of sadness, guilt, or unworthiness; crying spells; disturbance in appetite and weight changes; and disturbance in sleep. And, of course, these symptoms are determined by medical professionals to be more intense or prolonged than would generally be expected in normal, reactive depression.

The major differences between reactive depression and clinical depression are (1) the inability of the person suffering from clinical depression to exercise rational control of emotions, and (2) the permanent toll that suffering with clinical depression exacts.

Dysthymic disorder, or dysthymia, is characterized by long-term (2 years or longer) symptoms that may not be severe enough to disable a person but can prevent normal functioning or feeling well. People with dysthymia may also experience one or more episodes of major depression during their lifetimes.

I believe the public generally misunderstands clinical depression because of the wide range in its period of incubation and the relatively unimpaired appearance of its symptoms. Typically, diseases are accurately diagnosed by a medical doctor or specialist through thorough physical examination. People are very familiar with the meaning of these diagnoses and the severity of debilitating physical illnesses.

In the case of most "physical" diseases, the public doesn't question the onset of the malady, the severity of the symptoms, or the need for prompt, thorough, professional treatment. Unlike cancer, diabetes, or any other of a host of these physical maladies, a diagnosis of clinical depression is often viewed with skepticism and disbelief.

After all, most people have a connotation of sadness, crying, sleep deprivation, etc. as reactions to common emotions that a human experiences in the natural course of a life. Everybody expects these things to occur as normal repercussions of regretful situations such as breaking up with a companion, being laid off from a job, or losing a loved one.

"And then, over and over, I would say I was sick—sick with any documented ailment I could think of except 'depression,' which no one, no matter what the brochures with grainy girls’ pictures and the word 'reuptake' say, will ever believe is a real sickness." –Virginia Heffernan, “A Delicious Placebo”




I remember the complete desperation I felt in 1984 as I decided to make my first trip to a psychiatrist. I had experienced a couple of bouts with "nerves" before then -- one during my college days of the early '70s when I realized that changing my major from journalism to English would mean I had to take many extra classes and another during the time of my divorce from my first wife in 1977 -- but I had never felt so hopeless or so unable to experience even the slightest joy as in 1984.

Before I committed to treatment, I had tried to ride out what I thought was a bad case of the blues for at least a month. At first, I thought that I was just a little depressed in the sense of a lingering attitude that I had, in some way, perpetuated myself. So, I tried to rationalize the causes and apply the usual cures -- talking it out with friends, walking outdoors in the sunlight, getting some extra rest from daily stress. Although these activities would ease some pain, nothing I did would exorcise the intense dark spirit that had taken over my entire demeanor.

I was like a hiker on the edge of a dizzying cliff, who had felt a strong push and the loose shale shift beneath his feet. I was sliding toward a certain fall but desperately trying to stop my momentum. The normal lifesaving procedures I had always relied upon were failing. I didn't understand why I couldn't just "buck up" and stop my descent. I realized this beast was aiming to shove me below and kill me.

"I yearned to get better; I told myself I was getting better. In fact, the depression was still there, like a powerful undertow. Sometimes it grabbed me, yanked me under; other times, I swam free." –Tracy Thompson, The Beast: A Reckoning with Depression

Naturally, during that time, everyone who cared for me (including my wife and children, my parents, my brother, my coworkers, and my friends) wanted to know what was causing my sad behavior. I really didn't know, and, I was sure they thought my ignorance was just a lie to cover some awful situation. As time went on and I began looking and acting even worse, many of those around me felt I must be hiding the news that I had some terminal disease.

Yet, in truth, I wasn't grieving over a loved one or suffering from some terrible trauma. I did understand that the pressures of teaching (especially grading for some unknown reason) had triggered my recent panic attacks and deep dysphoria. I actually wished I had been the victim of some awful catastrophe because then, my state would have been justified as originating from a "worthy event." And, guess what? Every time I thought about people who had monumental reasons to be depressed, I felt guilty, and this guilt made me feel even worse. I remember thinking, "I would love to beat myself up."

When people told me to "cheer up" and "come out of it," I was certain they did not understand my inability to climb out of the deep hole I was in. I got so tired of hearing these attempts to force me to function in a world "filled with happiness and good thoughts" that I actually began to avoid all contact with others.

Something in my mind, something unknown to me, had made me a cripple -- a person who was mentally handicapped and who was becoming more and more physically handicapped from exhaustion, worry and lack of sleep and appetite. I tried and failed so many times to accept and practice the sage advice of "just think good thoughts" that my stomach turned at the mention of the words. Even good thoughts produced melancholy as anything "good" seemed to be a relic of a healthy past personality capable of feeling happiness.

"All their 'helpful' comments imply that if I’d only do _____, my problems would be solved. Like it’s all within my grasp, able to be managed and mastered, if only I would try harder, longer, better. As I nod my head in polite and pathetic appreciation for their input, I scream inside, 'Shut up! Shut up! Unless you’ve been lost in this particular section of hell yourself, don’t you dare try to give me directions.'"  –Martha Manning, Undercurrents: A Life Beneath the Surface

Frankly, I decided to make the trip to the doctor because I couldn't control any important parts of my daily existence. I knew I had experienced a nervous breakdown of some sort, but I was extremely embarrassed to be a mental patient. Before I had my first meeting with the psychiatrist, I had visions of media stereotypes that related to head "shrinking: I thought I was going to lie down on a couch and spill my innards about every bump and bruise that had occurred in my life.

Accepting the reality that you're "crazy" is not easy, especially after you have functioned so well for so long. I saw myself as a "nut" on the doorstep of the Cuckoo's Nest.

"It’s strange, the line you cross when you move from calm and satisfied with the rightness and safety of things to the sudden panic that the world has turned angry and dangerous." –Martha Manning, Undercurrents: A Life Beneath the Surface 

Nevertheless, I had run out of options. I had already been to my family M.D. and he had made the referral upon examining my skin full of frayed nerves. I was beginning to feel quite sure an "end" would be better than enduring much more unrelenting pain. I was close to suicide and even closer to wandering off somewhere on my own.

Instead, I took my first tentative steps to the psychiatrist's office. Arriving there and sitting in the waiting room, I felt like a goldfish in a fish bowl staring out at a hungry cat. I actually wondered if the doctor would devour me quicker than my illness. I thought, "This place is the beginning of the end of the world as I had once known it." I was totally petrified -- afraid of others, afraid of myself, afraid of what I had become, and afraid of my future as a lunatic.

"My world falls apart, crumbles, 'The center cannot hold.' There is no integrating force, only the naked fear, the urge of self-preservation. I am afraid. I am not solid, but hollow. I feel behind my eyes a numb, paralyzed cavern, a pit of hell, a mimicking nothingness. I never thought. I never wrote, I never suffered. I want to kill myself, to escape from responsibility, to crawl back abjectly into the womb. I do not know who I am, where I am going—and I am the one who has to decide the answers to these hideous questions. I long for a noble escape from freedom—I am weak, tired, in revolt from the strong constructive humanitarian faith which presupposes a healthy, active intellect and will. There is nowhere to go …"  –Sylvia Plath, journal, November 3, 1952

I waited there in shock for probably fifteen minutes before I met the psychiatrist. I will never forget the first words he said to me. He took one look at whatever transformation I had become and said, in a matter of fact voice, "You are probably the most depressed person I have ever seen."

At this point I would like to describe my feelings as a person who experiences bouts of OCD and clinical depression. For me, the onslaught begins as a simple worry about nothing in particular; I become fixated about a problem, an action, or a concern more than I should. Often, I feel I have made a mistake or I have caused some irreparable harm to others.

As my OCD takes hold, I honestly believe I have done something that could cause "the end the world" or, at the very least, could cost someone their life. I begin thinking, calculating, backtracking, double and triple checking, and doing any and everything to ease my mind. My panic and obsession build until I become mentally and physically exhausted.

Occasionally I reach some temporary but insufficient justification for my feelings. But then, almost immediately, I believe I have done something worse that supersedes the first injustice I had committed. I wonder,"Oh, hell, how do I fix this one?" The cycle starts again and continues to escalate until I begin to resist all  human contact and restrict all physical motivation.

As you might guess, this irrational OCD behavior makes me feel pretty depressed because its power over me is unrelenting. At this point, I begin my rapid free fall into the darkness of clinical depression -- a depression that grows ever blacker with each new day.

My nerves, which never were too steady, start feeling naked and exposed on every inch of my body. Sounds, sights, even touches become sources of irritation until they eventually peak and I am forced to withdraw completely -- to solitude, to silence, to bed in hopes of sleep. Sleep is the only comfort I find, but, even as I ready myself to sleep, I know waking will force upon me other worries and return me to the reality of my worst fear -- my mentally disturbed conscious self. So, I always spend as much time in bed as possible, and I begin to think, "Maybe I can sleep forever."

"... I feel tired to death, paralyzed by this mysteriously wasted life’s stubborn concentration on hopelessness and dissolution. It occurs to me that if I lie still like this for long enough, then I’ll be dead when I finally wake again, and nothing can ever again torment me, beset me, or present me with evidence of my baseness and decay. That thought is the only one that can comfort me." –Christer Kihlman, The Blue Mother

Soon, every time someone mentions I need to leave the house or get busy doing something, I feel dread and painful panic attacks that, much like cramps, spasmodically roll through my gut. I know the world outside is now a foreign landscape. I don't want to think about driving or even walking outside. I know I will mess something else up if I exit the house, and, besides, no one wants to be around a frowning, haggard, emotional mess.

"It’s enough just to speak when spoken to, to give some minimal reaction to a stimulus. But to actually be the stimulus doesn’t even occur to me." –Martha Manning, Undercurrents: A Life Beneath the Surface

Sometimes panic becomes more cerebral than physical, and, at that point, my mind recollects all the discretion of my past -- recent and distant -- the entire guilt-glutted load. Then, I feel I have to make up, in some manner, for all of my transgressions. As I realize it is impossible to correct all of these things, I feel worthless. My lack of sufficient means for atonement begins pangs of familiar guilty emotions that cycle over and over. I feel sorry... for anything and everything... for ever believing I had the right to interject in the affairs of others.

Thereupon, I withdraw to live completely within my mind, a brain now racing with emotions I know I can't express. It feels like limbo -- I find I purposely immobilize myself, but then, I feel guilty because I definitely understand my need to conquer my self-imposed isolation and deal with reality.

But, if I attempt to touch the real, functional world, I withdraw when anything becomes remotely "touchy." I avoid all possible confrontations: harmless visits are even out of the question. Besides, people know it is not "me" who is stumbling around like a zombie but instead the product of my disease. They have seen me act crazy before so if I do venture around them, they put on their "toleration faces" -- a mix of pity, distrust, and anxiety.

"I should come with a consumer warning, like the labels that say 'Handle with care' or 'May be hazardous to your health.' I am unfit for human consumption. I struggle to articulate how awful and isolating this feels, but I can’t find the words.  –Martha Manning, Undercurrents: A Life Beneath the Surface

In full-blown depression, I feel paralyzing fear towards anything that might evoke my emotions. Music, television, telephone calls -- I avoid them all. Having to experience emotion -- good or bad --makes me extremely overwrought. Joy and happiness do not exist when I am in this state. I become very self-centered, and I feel incapable of performing any task that requires judgment or cooperation.

At last, I get to the point where loneliness feels natural and I believe solitude is my designated state. As those around me eventually tire of my irrational, unchanging, "dark" demeanor, they avoid me until I can, once again "become myself."

After that, I find myself at the bottom of a deep, lonely grave that I have dug for myself. Ashamed of "doing it again," I live underground until my doctor finds the right mix of chemicals to balance the sensible workings of my brain. Gradually, I return to the surface and, eventually, I gladly feel "right" again. But, even then, I do not understand exactly how I became depressed. The only thing I do know is that I have been out of control, a "brainless man" again.

"That’s the thing I want to make clear about depression: It’s got nothing at all to do with life. In the course of life, there is sadness and pain and sorrow, all of which, in their right time and season, are normal—unpleasant, but normal. Depression is an altogether different zone because it involves a complete absence: absence of affect, absence of feeling, absence of response, absence of interest. The pain you feel in the course of a major clinical depression is an attempt on nature’s part (nature, after all, abhors a vacuum) to fill up the empty space. But for all intents and purposes, the deeply depressed are just the walking, waking dead." –Elizabeth Wurtzel, Prozac Nation

To close this entry, I want to stress a couple of my understandings. I believe once you first take the fall of clinical depression, you must always safeguard yourself with professional treatment. Two separate times since 1984 I decided to go without my medication. Why? I thought I was cured, and I wanted to be drug free and re-experience a life of independence. The first time I logged three years before I crashed. The second time I barely made one year before I bottomed out. Each time the fall was a little steeper, and I found it more difficult to mend. Now, at age 61, I have resigned myself to taking medication for the rest of my life. I still have some ups and downs but (as of yet) no major freefalls.

The other point I want to stress is this: Don't wait to find professional medical help. Despite feelings of shame or pride, you will benefit from fighting your illness with a doctor by your side. We tell ourselves "we can handle it" or "it's a sign of weakness to ask for help" but the truth is depression, ODC, and any major mental disorder can destroy the strongest individual. You are not defective or "nuts" if you are mentally handicapped. You can live a normal, happy life with the proper treatment. The smaller the fall you take, the better. Let the doctor diagnose your illness at the first sign of a problem. I hope this helps someone avoid the anguish of clinical depression.

"I hated being depressed,
but it was also in depression
that I learned my own acreage,
the full extent of my soul.
 –Andrew Solomon, The Noonday Demon

Thursday, March 22, 2012

Mental Illness and Me: Adventures In a Stigma Nation




"Recovery from mental illness

is not about complete relief from symptoms,
but about regaining a sense of control over life,
rather than feeling defined by the illness.
It is understood in a personal way
by each individual, often as a journey
toward self-determination, choice, and empowerment.

Although there may be setbacks
along the way,
the path is moving forward."


-Dr. Taylor Alexander, Chief Executive Officer
Canadian Mental Health Association

This is a subject I feel uncomfortable writing about since the audience seems to be fairly split on their opinions concerning the reality and the significance of these illnesses. Even a mention of the term mental illness puts many in mind of a condition that evidences itself in deplorable, tragically flawed lunatics.

The truth is I have been a victim of metal illness for decades, and I began receiving treatment for my clinical depression and obsessive-compulsive disorder in 1984. Since that time, I have been treated by a number of psychiatrists who have prescribed me a combination of various medications that help me live with certain brain abnormalities. Now, I am committed to a lifetime of taking drugs to control my illnesses.

I had to leave my teaching career in 2001. Since that time, this premature departure has represented extreme embarrassment and disappointment in my life. For years after receiving disability retirement, I felt a combination of guilt and inadequacy. After all, I had witnessed my students and my fellow staff, fully aware of my defects, engaging in hushed conversations as my condition surfaced and revealed itself more aggressively in the form of my disturbed mind.

Let me say, I completely understand why people act as they do around mentally or physically handicapped people. The foreign nature of the manifestations that result from a handicap run so contrary to normal that many don't know how to approach someone so atypical and so impaired.

In my case, some people began to treat me "differently" in very subtle, barely distinguishable ways. And, I believe their behavior was very legitimate considering their uninformed point of view about mental illnesses.

I know my illness pretty well now. I have fallen off the ledge of sanity into the deep chasm of depression, and I know how major depressive disorder can completely cripple a life. Once I experienced the first fall, other bouts with depression and OCD followed -- each more devastating than the previous one. No one with depression wants to experience the crushing feelings of hopelessness, sadness, and guilt generated by the disorder. People like me learn to maintain wellness thanks to medication, counseling, and avoiding stessors that trigger complications.

Most of the time, my medication balances the chemical imbalance in my brain, and I can function well. But, sometimes as I struggle to maintain a happy, normal existence, I occasionally find myself unintentionally slipping into mentally incompetent behaviors that befit a crazy man. These episodes can happen within the framework of a normal, functional day, and they are seemingly never ending irrationalities. In truth, the improprieties are mistakes, but I do not blame the actions on my disease. I just have to apologize to those I offend and pray to God for His forgiveness. I have become a person who accepts his condition and finds solace in grace -- I try to make up for my imperfections.



Dealing With Stigma and Being Mentally Ill

The ancient Greeks originated the term stigma to refer to bodily signs designed
to expose something unusual and bad
about the moral status of the signifier.

Stigma is a social phenomenon that has strong influence on eligibility, funding, and access to treatment of mental illness. At the community level stigma may affect how organizations including social service agencies, employers, health care providers, or schools respond to individuals with a mental illness and to their families. And at the individual level, stigma prohibits people from seeking the treatment they need, creates profound changes in identity and changes they way in which they are perceived by others.

"Nearly two-thirds of all people
with diagnosable mental disorders
do not seek treatment."


(Regier, D.A., Narrow W. E., Rae D.S., Manderscheid, R.W., Locke BZ & Goodwin F.K. The De Facto US Mental and Addictive Disorders Service System. Epidemiologic Catchment Area Prospective 1 Year Prevalence Dates of Disorders and Services, Archives of General Psychiatry,       1993)

Stigma surrounding the receipt of mental health treatment is among the many barriers that discourage people from seeking treatment . The stigmatization of mental illness and the lack of information on the symptoms of mental illness are seen as the main barriers to seeking help for mental health problems. 

Research confirms that public perception of mental illness has changed significantly -- and for the good -- in the last 15 years. That doesn't mean, however, that people feel comfortable working or living near or being friends with someone with mental illness, according to a major new survey.


The study in 1996 and 2006 compared people's responses to vignettes involving mental illness to gauge public understanding of the ailments. The idea was to assess whether major efforts to improve the treatment of mental conditions and eliminate stigma in the United States is working. Several sweeping efforts have been made in the past two decades to educate Americans about mental illness. A major theme of these campaigns was that mental illnesses are biological, brain-based, sometimes-genetic illnesses that are each "a disease like any other."


The survey found the public has embraced that concept, but only to a point. The percentage of people who attributed depression to neurobiological causes increased from 54% of those surveyed in 1996 to 67% in 2006. And, those who endorsed psychiatrists to help treat alcoholism increased from 61% to 79% in the 10-year period.

"However, the willingness to associate with people
with these disorders did not change much.
For example, the percentage of people
who said they are unwilling to work closely
with someone with major depression was
46% in 1996 and 47% in 2006.
The percentage of people who considered people
with schizophrenia to be a danger to others
was 54% in 1996 and 60% in 2006."

(Bernice A. Pescosolido, Ph.D.; Jack K. Martin, Ph.D.; J. Scott Long, Ph.D.; Tait R. Medina, M.A.; Jo C. Phelan, Ph.D.; Bruce G. Link, Ph.D. "A Disease Like Any Other? A Decade of Change in Public Reactions to Schizophrenia, Depression, and Alcohol Dependence." The American Journal of Psychiatry. Vol. 167, 2010)

The U.S. Surgeon General, in his 1999 report
on mental health, identified stigma
as a key barrier not only to adequate treatment
but also to the breadth of life opportunities
for people with mental illness.

Key to this body of research have been first-person studies—that is, obtaining the perspective of people who have been labeled as mentally ill about their experiences with stigma.
These surveys and qualitative interviews with persons who have mental illness have yielded several findings. The results suggest that a majority of these persons perceive themselves as being stigmatized by others, expect to be treated poorly by the public because of this stigma, and suffer demoralization and low self-esteem due to internalization of the stigma.

(Patrick Corrigan, Psy.D.; Vetta Thompson, Ph.D.; David Lambert, Ph.D.; Yvette Sangster; Jeffrey G. Noel, Ph.D.; Jean Campbell, Ph.D. "Perceptions of Discrimination Among Persons With Serious Mental Illness." Psychiatric Services. 2003.)

Other research attempted to evaluate the relationship of mental illness and violence by asking three questions:

(1) Are the mentally ill violent?
(2) Are the mentally ill at increased risk of violence?
(3) Are the public at risk?
Findings showed that mental disorders
are neither necessary
nor sufficient causes of violence.

Major determinants of violence continue to be socio-demographic and economic factors. Substance abuse is a major determinant of violence and this is true whether it occurs in the context of a concurrent mental illness or not.

Therefore, early identification and treatment of substance abuse problems, and greater attention to the diagnosis and management of concurrent substance abuse disorders among seriously mentally ill, may be potential violence prevention strategies.

Members of the public exaggerate both the strength of the association between mental illness and violence and their own personal risk. The researchers found that too little is known about the social contextual determinants of violence, but the study supported the view the mentally ill are more often victims than perpetrators of violence.

(Heather Stuart. "Violence and Mental Illness: An Overview." World Psychiatry. 2. June 2003)

I have grown accustomed to the stigma of being mentally ill. It is true that some of these feelings of being stigmatized by others probably stem from own my active, crazy imagination. I do not hide the fact that I suffer from mental illnesses as I once did. However, I still feel frustration when others see my "difference" to be grounds for distrust and for alienation.

Often, when associates do not question me about my illness, I feel especially suspect that they see only the fractured part of me. I do not want to be judged as irreparable refuse nor as an object in need of pity. I simply want to be myself -- a person who, much like a diabetic, has primary medical concerns that must be carefully managed.

The very biggest disappointment of my life since 2001 is that I am unable to have any actual association with my profession. Once Ohio (STRS) judges a person is disabled, he cannot engage in ANY work related to his profession. I was educated and trained to be a high school teacher. I have over 27 years of practice as a teacher. I was president of my class my freshman through senior high school years.

I actually started working with youth in 1970, just one year after my own high school graduation, as a counselor and a tutoring project director. I know what caused me to burn out and, believe me, it was not instructing students or leading activities. My eventual disability resulted after a long battle with chronic depression.

The one thing I can do well is teach -- now, I am forbidden to take part in any remotely related field or venture. Why? Because I am mentally ill. And, if you think like many, I am defective. Unfortunately, my chronic disease does not reside in the kidneys, the liver, the lungs, the stomach, or the heart. My illness is in my brain; therefore, Frank was "once a normal ol' boy" but now "he's one crazy old shit." Both the reality of the effects of the disease and the stigma against it are inescapable.

Wednesday, March 21, 2012

Chanting at NCAA Basketball Game Costs Five Southern Miss Students Their Scholarships



Sometimes, two or more events that are unlikely to occur together by chance are observed to happen in a meaningful manner. This experience is known as synchronicity, first described by Swiss psychologist Carl Gustav Jung. The concept of synchronicity does not question, or compete with, the notion of causality (one event causing another). Instead, it maintains that, just as events may be grouped by cause, they may also be grouped by meaning. A grouping of events by meaning need not have an explanation in terms of cause and effect.

I thought about this term today as I read the news. I have written about a particular subject several times recently, so I fear another post on the subject may make people think I am purposely harping about some personal agenda. However, since I try to find timely material for blogging, I can't help but report this news because the synchronicity seemed to smack me squarely in the face.

The News Story

"Mississippi has revoked the scholarships of five members (not identified) of its pep band who took part in the heckling of a Kansas State basketball player at last Thursday's NCAA  men's basketball tournament game.

"The school announced Tuesday that the five students also were removed from the band and will be required to complete a two-hour cultural sensitivity training course this week

"Southern Miss issued an apology last week to Kansas State point guard Angel Rodriguez after he was the target of chants of "Where's your green card?" during the Wildcats' 70-64 second-round victory in the NCAA tournament. Rodriguez had 13 points and four assists in the game that was played in Pittsburgh....

"Rodriguez said last week that he accepted the apology because 'there's ignorant people and I know that's not how they want to represent their university.'

"Rodriguez said he doesn't pay attention to that  'nonsense, especially because Puerto Rico is a commonwealth, so we don't need any type of papers.'" ("5 Southern Miss Pep Band Members Disciplined For 'Green Card' Chant," Fox News, http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/03/20/five-from-southern-miss-pep-band-disciplined/?test=latestnews, March 20 2012)

Of course, I find a very real similarity between this Southern Miss/Kansas State game and the Ohio High School Tournament game that pitted PHS against Valley. I needn't review the claims of derogatory chanting and latent racist overtones during that high school contest. My prior entries are posted in the blog for all to review. If you need to get some background, just go back a few days.

The "touch," the synchronicity of these two highly competitive events warrants attention. Why? As I stated before, I think many people lose sensitivity as they allow emotion to come to the fore. And, rather remarkably, even after the fervor of a contest cools and some attendees report inappropriate behaviors had occurred, many people allow school "pride" to take precedence over defending human dignity. These folks want to deny or soften any charges by basically saying "it was no big deal."

What do I think the importance of the synchronicity of these events two displays? Well, several things that were the subject of hot debate last week.


1. Mixed connotation is really no excuse for actual abusive language during a school event. The utterances:

                 Valley/PHS                                                              Southern Miss/Kansas State

"Ribs and chicken!" "STD!" "You can't read!"                     "Where's your green card!"
"You suck!" "OGT!"


2. The public nor the players should be subjected to, or the target of, derisive actions that may interfere with their rights as they relate to discrimination or peaceful assembly.

                Valley/PHS                                                              Southern Miss/Kansas State

Utterances viewed as racist, sexually derogatory,                Utterences viewed as racist.
and acadacemically and socially degrading.



3. A very tiny, aggressive contingent in a heated crowd can cause major disturbances and jeopardize the safety of everyone.

                Valley/PHS                                                              Southern Miss/Kansas State

Not specified other than "a few students"                        Five members of the                 
and reports of a few adults.                                                Southern Miss pep band.



4. Those who insist in jeering, chanting insults, or engaging in any other inappropriate behaviors at a school event should be punished.

                Valley/PHS                                                          Southern Miss/Kansas State

Valley Superintendent vowed "to administer          Southern Miss took scholarshios
 appropriate disciplinary actions." PHS                  of the five pep band members. USM's
did not report their disciplinary response.              athletic director and school personnel
                                                                                     came to Kansas State's team hotel to
                                                                                     apologize.


I believe synchronicity has made the connection of these two events, one secondary school and one college, a very appropriate learning moment for local high schools, their fans, and their teams.

One of my major duties as a high school teacher was to prepare students for college -- not only to groom them for the rigors of subject matter they would face but also to provide them with workable keys to surviving and thriving in the vastly different college experience. In short, I needed to ready my classes for a very big transition, one I had experienced and lived through for over seven years.

The reality is that high schools must realize that most colleges will not tolerate aggressive, harmful behaviors or racism of any kind. If college students believe excuses and thoughtless, stonewalling explanations will pardon them from wrongdoings, they are simply wrong. Unfortunately, five Southern Mississippi pep band members found this out the hard way. Scholarship gone = no refund.

These pep band members couldn't explain away the offense with a connotation that "Where's your green card?" was a reference to a warning in hockey or to a card that permits access to a library. These students thought they knew the background of Angel Rodriguez (They obviously didn't.), and they, in some way believed that racist chants would help their basketball team, so they spewed their false hatred against Angel and against aliens onto the floor. Period.

Did you ever try arguing with a professor or with a dean or with any college official? Don't waste your time with excuses and emotional displays. Colleges and universities demand personal responsibility from their students.

This is a powerful but much-needed lesson for college preparation. The lesson is that the intent and actual utterance or display of bigotry, prejudice, animosity, or rude partiality will be considered facts for judging those who cannot control their emotional behavior. And, all members of a school, no matter what age, are personally responsible for any regrettable actions they commit while a member of the institution.

Spelling it out rudely -- in a family crowd, you don't have to shout "Nigger!" or "White Trash!" or "Queer!" or "Mother fucker!" or "I want to kill you!" or "You're an ignorant sped!" or "You are a ho bitch!" to get into trouble... trouble that could cost you money, precious time, imprisonment, or future embarrassment. All you have to do is intentionally insult just one other individual to be deemed wrong and guilty. Why? Because you, at minimum, are responsible for your own actions, and, in certain circumstances, are responsible for the ugly actions of others. You can't plead, "The crowd make me do it."

I hope this little case of synchronicity may save someone from losing something of value in the future.