Tuesday, June 29, 2021

COVID-19: An Up-to-date "Snapshot" of the Virus In Scioto County

 


We're experiencing a pandemic that has changed our way of life. The United States has totaled 33,727,123 COVID-19 cases and 609,265 from the COVID-19 virus. New cases are emerging at their lowest levels since testing became widely available. Deaths and hospitalizations continue to decline, but around 300 coronavirus deaths continue to be reported most days.

Where are we, the people of Scioto County? Is the worst over? It certainly looks as if we will continue to climb out of the devastation and disruptions caused by the disease. However, the future is still uncertain with many factors in play. How many people will continue to choose to get vaccinated or will variants of the virus emerge that are resistant to the vaccines?

Some experts expect the virus to continue to be an endemic – a disease that establishes a baseline in the communities as outbreaks may occur here and there, but generally, something kind of circulating in the background.

Let's see where Scioto is at the moment.

Snapshot View

The following is an up-to-date “snapshot” view of Scioto County, Ohio featuring key data for monitoring the COVID-19 pandemic. The primary source for the information is the COVID-19 Integrated County View on the Centers For Disease Control and Prevention's “COVID Data Tracker.” (CDC COVID Data Tracker) Please consult the source to check on numbers and other information.

The data on this page has been reported by U.S. News and reflects “people who have received the second dose in a two-dose COVID-19 vaccine series or one dose” of the Johnson & Johnson vaccine, according to the CDC. However, the agency also stipulates that people are not considered fully vaccinated until two weeks after their last shot.

As of June 27, 2021, in Scioto County …

COVID Cases

The total COVID-19 cases number 6,548 or 8,694.3/100k.

7-Day Totals, Rates, Percentages, and % Change in Last 7 Days are as follows:

  • 18 cases or 23.9 per 100k,

  • 1 new hospital admission or (0.51 per 100 beds)

  • 1.32% positive change,

COVID Deaths

Scioto County has recorded 107 total COVID-19 deaths or 142.1k per 100k. New deaths are now 0 per day.

COVID Fully Vaccinated

The level of community transmission in Scioto County is “moderate” (above “low” and under “substantial” and “high”).

Only 33.8% of the people in Scioto County (25,438) are fully vaccinated. *62.7% of the population age 65+ (8,803) have been fully vaccinated, 42.1% of age 18+. and 39.3% of Age 12+

* Scioto County has a population of 75,314. 18.6% of that population is 65 and older.

The testing volume is 602 in the last 7 days or (799.32 per 100k).

The United States

As of June 28, 2021, 153.8 million people or 46.3% of the people in the U.S. have been fully vaccinated. 77.7% of the population 65+ have been fully vaccinated. 57% of people 18+ and 54.2% of those 12+ have been fully vaccinated.

Conclusions

These are the numbers as they stand. As we open up this summer, it is evident the risk of transmission is considerable. Although most seem to have abandoned wearing masks and social distancing, Scioto lags behind the nation as a whole in the percentage of people vaccinated – despite the CDC saying vaccines are “safe and effective.

The statitistics indicate a genuine reluctance of the population here to take necessary precautions for safe social contact. Numbers are down; however, the future holds uncertainty because of the lack of herd immunity.

Johns Hopkins reports if 80% of a population is immune to a virus, four out of every five people who encounter someone with the disease won’t get sick (and won’t spread the disease any further). In this way, the spread of infectious diseases is kept under control. Depending how contagious an infection is, usually 50% to 90% of a population needs immunity before infection rates start to decline.

Below any “herd immunity threshold,” immunity in the population (for example, from vaccination) can still have a positive effect. And above the threshold, infections can still occur. The higher the level of immunity, the larger the benefit. This is why it is important to get as many people as possible vaccinated.

(Gypsy Amber D'Souza and David Dowdy. “What is Herd Immunity and How Can We Achieve It With COVID-19?” John Hopkins COVID-19 SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH EXPERT INSIGHTS. April 06, 2021.)

Individuals are fully vaccinated two weeks after receiving their final vaccine dose. If you are fully vaccinated, you may choose to follow the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s recommendations for fully vaccinated people since your risk of getting sick is much lower – including participating in indoor activities and traveling more freely,

The C.D.C. still recommends wearing a mask in settings where Covid-19 may spread more easily, including healthcare facilities, correctional facilities, homeless shelters, transportation hubs and on all forms of public transportation. This helps protect people who may be particularly vulnerable to the virus and also to prevent spread.

Things can change … quickly. Look to reliable sources for future updates: state and local health agencies (cases, deaths, vaccinations); U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (hospitalizations, test positivity); Centers for Disease Control (vaccinations).

As recent as June 18, The New York Times reported ...

Cases have increased recently and are high. The number of hospitalized Covid patients has fallen in the Scioto County area. Deaths have remained at about the same level. The test positivity rate in Scioto County is relatively low, suggesting that testing capacity is adequate for evaluating Covid-19 spread in the area.

An average of 3 cases per day were reported in Scioto County, a 54 percent increase from the average two weeks ago. Since the beginning of the pandemic, at least 1 in 11 residents have been infected, a total of 6,556 reported cases. Right now, Scioto County is at a moderate risk for unvaccinated people.”

(“Tracking Coronavirus in Scioto County.” The New York Times. June 18, 2021.)

Of course, Scioto citizens must consider that recent cases have increased in Jackson and Adams Counties (as reported June 18). And, as of June 27, Adams reported 23.74% fully vaccinated, Jackson 33.56, and Pike 30.78. Greenup County, Kentucky reports 31.05% fully vaccinated that same date.






Monday, June 28, 2021

Go, Go, Gosar ... Just Go Far Away And Out of Congress

 


The media generally cannot get enough of writing about right-wing nutcases in the House Republican caucuses, yet somehow Arizona Rep. Paul Gosar, D.D.S., seems to fly under the radar relative to Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene, Louie Gohmert, or Lauren Boebert. But Gosar is probably the most far-gone nativist member in Congress. No one in Congress was more devoted to the “Stop the Steal” cause, for which he organized rallies.

'Once we conquer the Hill,' Gosar said at a December rally in Arizona, 'Donald Trump is returned to being president.' He got the first part right, at least, on Jan. 6.

In February, Gosar was the only sitting member of Congress to speak at a white nationalist event, the America First Political Action Conference, after which the crowd chanted his name.

And just recently, Gosar, along with Greene, was busted after an early platform draft for their proposed 'America First Caucus,' rife with nativist dog whistles about preserving 'Anglo-Saxon political traditions' (in the section about immigration) and restoring the 'architectural, engineering and aesthetic value that befits the progeny of European architecture.' Gosar denied authorship of the memo, and the proposed caucus fizzled out faster than the soccer super league.

If you think of Greene as the person who reads baffling nativist conspiracies online and shares them on Facebook, think of Gosar as the reply guy in the comments saying you didn’t know this? His own family hates him, and he hates the pope. He maintains his membership on the Natural Resources Committee, as well as the Oversight and Reform Committee.”

Jim Newell, “The Surge” Paul Gosar, The Worst Member of Congress,” Slate

Paul Anthony Gosar is an American politician and former dentist who has served as the U.S. Representative for Arizona's 4th congressional district since 2013. The Arizona Republic has called Gosar "Arizona's most controversial member of Congress." This distinction may now extend past rural northwestern Arizona to the nation as a whole.

The fact that Gosar has been at the center of the national controversy has been very personal for his siblings – six who had been vocal in urging voters not to re-elect him to Congress because of his fringe views. Now, some want him removed from office, and they criticize Democratic leadership for not acting more quickly.

Two of his estranged siblings told NBC News in interviews that the congressman's conduct around the riot should be investigated and that he should face more serious consequences for his ongoing efforts to delegitimize the election results and the attack on the U.S. Capitol.

"I consider him a traitor to this country. I consider him a traitor to his family," Gosar's brother, Dave, a Wyoming attorney, said. "He doesn't see it. He's disgraced and dishonored himself."

Dave Gosar, one of the more outspoken members of the family, said his falling out with his brother began soon after his brother ran for office in 2010 and "revealed to me that he was a birther," promoting the false idea that then-President Barack Obama was not born in the U.S.

Family members decided to speak out in 2017 after Gosar suggested that the white nationalist rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, where a counterprotester was killed, was a false flag – that the event was actually the product of sympathetic actors seeking to hurt conservative causes.

Jennifer Gosar, the youngest of the congressman's nine siblings, told NBC News she's confident her brother played a significant role in the effort that culminated in the Capitol riot.

"I was concerned before," Jennifer Gosar, a Seattle-based Spanish translator, said of the riot. "I was horrified during, and I'm shocked that he's not censured now, that there hasn't been a process for expulsion. I mean, I think all the elements are clear. And maybe there's something I'm missing, but they're not acting on it to really allay any fears of the public."

(Allan Smith. “Gosar's siblings want their brother kicked out of Congress. They think Democrats are moving too slow.” NBC News. June 28, 2021)

What About January 6?

Gosar repeatedly spoke at “Stop the Steal” events, claiming without basis that then-President-elect Biden was an "illegitimate usurper" and that Trump was the victim of an attempted coup.

In December after the election, right-wing political activist and organizer Ali Alexander said that he, Gosar, Biggs, and Representative Mo Brooks were "planning something big": a "mob" to pressure Congress into rejecting the election results.

For Jan. 6, Alexander claimed in a video, he had some organizing assistance from pro-Trump Reps. Paul Gosar (R-AZ), Andy Biggs (R-AZ), and Mo Brooks (R-AL).

"We four schemed up putting maximum pressure on Congress while they were voting,” Alexander said in a video posted before the Jan. 6 protest.

(Rob Kuznia, Curt Devine, Scott Bronstei. “Extremists intensify calls for violence ahead of Inauguration Day.” CNN. January 08, 2021.)

Gosar's office did not respond to media inquiries about this allegation. News outlets noted that Gosar's social media accounts had expressed support for Alexander in the past.

At Trump's rally before the riot, Gosar tweeted: "Biden should concede. I want his concession on my desk tomorrow morning. Don’t make me come over there."

In that tweet, he tagged the far-right activist Ali Alexander, who organized the "Stop the Steal" movement and with whom Gosar rallied elsewhere in an effort to overturn the election.

Weeks before the riot, Alexander told followers in a since-deleted video on Periscope that he, Gosar, and along with two other members, "schemed up [the idea] of putting maximum pressure on Congress while they were voting" on Jan. 6. to "change the minds of Republicans in that body hearing our loud roar from outside."

Gosar was one of the 139 representatives who voted to overturn the results of the 2020 U.S. presidential election in Congress on January 7, 2021, the day after the storming of the U.S. Capitol.

(Karen Yourish, Larry Buchanan; Denise Lu. "The 147 Republicans Who Voted to Overturn Election Results.” The New York Times. January 07, 2021.)

And, hours after the January 6 storming of the Capitol, during which one police officer and four marchers eventually died, Gosar was the first federally elected official to amplify a baseless conspiracy, and it took only three hours for him to get there.

Gosar said that antifa was to blame for the violence, a baseless theory also echoed by representatives Mo Brooks and Matt Gaetz.

(Teo Armus. “Rep. Matt Gaetz and other GOP politicians baselessly suggest antifa is to blame for pro-Trump mob rioting into Capitol.” The Washington Post. January 07, 2021.)

When Congress reconvened that night, the challenge to the Arizona vote had been rejected 6-93 in the Senate and 121-303 in the House. Gosar, Biggs and Debbie Lesko of Arizona voted to reject Arizona's vote results.

("Roll Call Vote 117th Congress – 1st Session: On the Objection (Shall the Objection Submitted by the Gentleman from Arizona, Mr. Gosar, and the Senator from Texas, Mr. Cruz, and Others Be Sustained? )". www.senate.gov. United States Senate. January 6, 2021.)

On January 19, 2021, the last day of the Trump administration, it was reported that Gosar and Biggs sought pardons from Trump. No pardons were granted to them or anyone else involved in the storming of the Capitol or the preceding "Save America" rally.

(Jim Small. "Biggs and Gosar sought pardons for Capitol riot, but didn't get them.” Arizona Mirror. January 19, 2021.)

On February 26, 2021, Gosar delivered the keynote speech at the America First Political Action Conference, a white nationalist conference whose organizer, Nick Fuentes, spoke approvingly of the Capitol storming. Gosar was the only elected official to attend the event, speaking after former congressman Steve King (R-Iowa), who lost a 2020 primary after party leaders abandoned him over a string of white-nationalist remarks.

After Gosar’s speech, Fuentes, who marched in the 2017 white supremacist rally in Charlottesville and was outside the Capitol with his supporters during the Jan. 6 riot, took the podium that warned that “white people are done being bullied.” Fuentes praised the fatal riot as “awesome,” describing it as “light-hearted mischief.”

Ironically, Gosar said that he opposed "white racism," hours after speaking at the far-right conference whose organizer spoke approvingly of the Capitol insurrection while delivering a white-nationalist speech.

I want to tell you, I denounce . . . white racism,” Gosar said during a panel at the Conservative Political Action Conference. “That’s not appropriate.”

(David Weigel. “Rep. Gosar criticizes ‘white racism’ after speaking at event whose organizer called for white supremacy.” The New York Times. February 27, 2021.)

Long after the Capitol riot, Gosar has led the defense of those who stormed the Capitol, calling them "peaceful patriots" at a May 12 hearing. He has sought to paint Ashli Babbit, the rioter who was shot and killed by Capitol Police after attempting to breach an entrance near the House chamber as members and aides were fleeing, as a victim who was "executed." He added the unnamed officer was "lying in wait" for her.

Gosar said Babbitt, who was shot and killed by a Capitol Police officer through a window of the House chamber, was not armed and was wrapped in a U.S. Flag.

Was the death of Ashli Babbitt a homicide?” Mr. Gosar said, grilling former Trump administration officials at a hearing on the riot. “As the death certificate said, it was a homicide.”

(Alex Swayer. “Paul Gosar defends ‘executed’ Ashli Babbitt during Capitol riot hearing.” The Washington Times. May 12, 2021.)

Gosar joined 20 House Republicans in voting against awarding Congressional Gold Medals to the officers who defend the Capitol against the mob.

"On January 6, as the violent mob advanced on the House chamber, I was standing near @RepGosar and helped him open his gas mask. The Capitol Police led us to safety. It is disgusting and despicable to see Gosar lie about that day and smear the men and women who defended us," tweeted Republican Rep. Liz Cheney of Wyoming, who was ousted from GOP leadership in May after she repeatedly rejected Trump's election lies.

(Annie Grayer and Kristin Wilson. “21 Republicans vote no on bill to award Congressional Gold Medal for January 6 police officers.” CNN. June 16, 202.)


Who Is the Real Paul Gosar?

Despite his claims of denial, Gosar is a lying, bigoted, racist, conspiracy-spreading White nationalist. For all of the reasons cited abover, Gosar is a traitor to the nation who should be expelled from Congress … just ask his own family.

For good measure of support, allow me to tack on some more. His long history of misconduct, spreading misinformation, and misguided leadership includes the following:

  • In December 2014, Gosar drew controversy when he referred to American Indians as "wards of the federal government.”

  • On August 12, 2019 Gosar retweeted a QAnon idea – “I have a tip. I think high level FBI agents may have colluded with British agents and Democrat operatives to initiate an illegal coup against @realDonaldTrump and @POTUS. I mean at least this bears a cursory review. Perhaps. Maybe.

  • On January 6, 2020, Gosar tweeted a doctored photograph that showed former President Barack Obama meeting Iranian President Hassan Rouhani, with the caption: "The world is a better place without these guys in power.” The encounter never happened; the picture was a photoshopped version of one showing Obama meeting former Indian prime minister Manmohan Singh.

  • On January 29, 2021, The New York Times detailed Gosar's support for and past ties with extremist militia groups, including the Proud Boys and the Oath Keepers, some of whose members participated in the 2021 storming of the United States Capitol

  • Rep. Paul Gosar, an Arizona Republican, told a right-wing militant group that the US was in a civil war and predicted it would become violent, Jim Arroyo, the leader of an Arizona chapter of Oath Keepers, said in a Nov. 2020 video. We asked [Gosar] flat-out, at that time, do you think we’re heading into a civil war?” Arroyo said of his exchange with Gosar. “And his response to the group was just flat-out, ‘We’re in it, we just haven’t started shooting yet.'”

  • In June 2021, Gosar was one of 14 House Republicans to vote against legislation to establish June 19, or Juneteenth, as a federal holiday.

No one should forget Gosar's most egregious errors. Consider that Gosar says the riots were conducted by “peaceful patriots“ and that “outright propaganda and lies” about the day have been deployed against “law-abiding U.S. citizens, especially Trump voters” to paint them as political criminals.

Paul Gosar is without regret. He practices a philosophy rooted in hatred and violence, and he is consumed by an obstinate devotion to his own prejudices. Gosar's deceit belies his representation in Congress. His narrow mind focuses on extremist views and wild speculation.

Perhaps, Laurie Roberts of the Arizona Republic says it best …

Here is Rep. Paul 'who me?' Gosar, who for two months, without so much as a shred of evidence, has been howling at the moon about election fraud. A guy who, just before rioters stormed the Capitol, stood on the House floor on Wednesday afternoon and outright lied as he objected to Arizona’s vote, declaring, 'Over 400,000 mail-in ballots were altered, switched from President Trump to Vice President Biden or completely erased from President Trump's total.'

Minutes later, his rhetoric was a bit more muted.

'Ok. I said let’s do an audit. Let’s not get carried away here,' he tweeted. 'I don’t want anyone hurt. We are protesting the violation of our laws. We are builders not destroyers. BLM burns and loots. We build. If anyone on the ground reads this and is beyond the line come back' …

(Who will stand up now?) To stand up now for the once-Grand Old Party and stare down the Kelli Wards and Paul Gosars of the world, the zealots and cultists who have fed lie after lie to their base as they helped Trump light the spark that ignited an assault not seen since 1814, when the British invaded the nation’s Capitol?”

(Laurie Roberts. “Hey, Rep. Gosar, you own Wednesday's insurrection at the nation's Capitol. Arizona Republic, azcentral.com. January 07, 2021.)




Iconic Vision of Marilyn Monroe -- Honest Sexuality Or Monument To Misogyny

 


In The Seven Year Itch, Monroe plays a character significantly named “The Girl,” and this film thus embodied much of what defined Monroe as an abstract sex symbol. The object of a married man’s fantasies and desires, The Girl represents an honest and delighted sexuality—which she revels in as she stands over a subway grate and the cool air billows her white skirt around her thighs.

This vision of Monroe created a lasting impression on the American psyche, but it remained wedded to the type of role she increasingly disdained.”

Margot A. Henriksen, “Marilyn Monroe,” American National Biography

In 2021, it seems people are getting their panties in a wad over an enormous, 26-foot-tall painted statue of “The Girl” planted in the middle of a downtown street in Palm Springs, California.

The statue, titled “Forever Marilyn” but now colloquially re-christened #MeTooMarilyn was the handiwork of the late New Jersey artist J. Seward Johnson II, scion of the Johnson & Johnson pharmaceutical family. (He died last year at 89.) The thing was created in 2011 and was displayed in Palm Springs from 2012 to 2014 before moving to other cities.

It now beckons viewers in Palm Springs to saunter between a woman’s spread legs, look up her billowing dress and snicker at her panty-clad crotch – or, better yet, snap a photo for posting on social media.

This sculptural crotch shot is presented as a welcome draw for desert resort tourism, battered during the COVID-19 pandemic. The 34,000-pound sculpture was purchased for $1 million by PS Resorts, a city tourism organization funded partly by transient occupancy taxes.

Councilman Geoff Kors, who is also a legislative strategist for the National Center for Lesbian Rights, said in an interview with Palm Springs TV KESQ …

This is a great free attraction, and I think it will be great for our businesses, and it’s great to have free attractions for our residents. She’s been a great free attraction before, and she will be again.”

(Jeffrey Cawood. “Feminists Condemn Installation Of Marilyn Monroe Statue As ‘Misogynistic,’ Claim It Was Designed ‘To Look At Her Crotch.” Daily Wire. June 24, 2021.)

However, protesters – including those from the Women's March LA Foundation – view this artwork as a colossal monument to misogyny. And, they see its celebratory unveiling during LGBTQ Pride Month as especially repugnant. Misogyny’s contempt for women is the root of homophobia and transphobia.

(Christopher Knight. “Commentary: Marilyn Monroe statue in Palm Springs is an offense to Pride Month.” Los Angleles Times. June 21, 2021.)

The statue is designed to look at her crotch and look at her buttocks and take photos. And that is no longer acceptable,” said Emiliana Guereca, executive director of the Women’s March Foundation. “It may have been acceptable in the 1950s, but we are in 2021 fighting the same thing and women are saying enough is enough.”

(Jeffrey Cawood. “Feminists Condemn Installation Of Marilyn Monroe Statue As ‘Misogynistic,’ Claim It Was Designed ‘To Look At Her Crotch.” Daily Wire. June 24, 2021.)

We would never celebrate a powerful man [with a] 26-foot tall sculpture with his pants pulled down,” Elizabeth Armstrong, former director of the Palm Springs Art Museum, told KESQ News.


Famous Depiction

The "Forever Marilyn" statue depicts the late actress Marilyn Monroe in one of her most famous on-screen moments. The statue shows Monroe with her dress blowing up in a scene from the 1955 film, The Seven Year Itch.

In 1954, director Billy Wilder was filming a scene of the film on Lexington Avenue between 52nd and 53rd Street in New York City. In the script, Monroe and co-star Tom Ewell exit a movie theater and a breeze from the subway passing below lifts Monroe’s dress. Instead of rushing to cover her legs, as any decent woman of that era would have, Monroe exclaims, “Isn't it delicious?”

Most people don't know there were two separate shoots. One was a publicity event in New York where a large crowd of bystanders and the press were invited to create hype. The noise of the crowd rendered the film footage unusable and Billy Wilder reshot the scene on a closed soundstage in Los Angeles. Sam Shaw was the photographer. It was his idea to use a picture from the movie theater scene as the logo to promote the film, and it was his job to create the images.

(Melissa Stevens.“Behind-the-Scenes of Marilyn Monroe's Iconic Flying Skirt.” biography.com.September 10, 2020.)


The very brief scene – a matter of a few seconds but shot a total of 14 times– became iconic in movie history and that little white number is now one the most famous dresses of all time.
It remained as a classic dress designed by the famous William Travilla.

Note: William Travilla created the costume for the star (he also designed Marilyn's outfits in several other films, including the pink dress from Gentlemen Prefer Blondes). Even though William didn't think much of the white dress (he once called it "that silly little dress"), the gown has been celebrated for generations. Following William's death in 1990, his costume sketch for the gown sold for $50,000.

(Marlisse Cepeda. “Whatever Happened to Marilyn Monroe's Famous White Dress?” Woman's Day. April 21, 2016.)

At the publicity stunt in New York, a large crowd of bystanders and press were invited to create hype around the filming.

The dress also reportedly took part in Monroe’s divorce with her second husband, Joe DiMaggio. He “hated” the dress and argued with the actress backstage for the drama she caused during the shooting of the scene.

According to DiMaggio, the whole incident was an ‘embarrassment.” According to director Billy Wilder, Joe seethed with jealousy and had ‘the look of death’ when he saw his wife’s skirts fly skyward. As most vicious abusers do, he held his tongue until Marilyn was done shooting.

(Ian Harvey. “The iconic flying skirt – The trouble Marilyn Monroe's little white dress had caused.” The Vintage News. January 09, 2017.)

Reports say when Monroe got back to the hotel, DiMaggio “gave her a beat down that put her out of work for a week. He almost killed her.”

History of Yesterday writes …

Despite the many dumb blonde clichés surrounding Marilyn, she was far from playing the fool in real life. She might have let a breeze take her skirts, but she would not let an abuser take her dignity. Marilyn filed for divorce shortly after Joe’s beating.

Today, we remember Marilyn’s iconic dress and her skirt-flying moment as a symbol of breaking sexual norms. But that sexual freedom came at a price. When Marilyn stopped giggling for the camera, she had to face a jealous husband. A husband who demanded she give up acting and her coquettish publicity stunts.

Joe wanted Marilyn to playact the demur housewife. And when he didn’t get his way, he beat the crap out of her. In the long run, her white “subway dress” may have saved her life.”

(Carlyn Beccia. “The Dark Truth Behind Marilyn Monroe's White Dress.” History of Yesterday. January 19, 2021.)

Note: Debbie Reynolds purchased the original dress for $200. In a June 2011 auction, it sold for 5.52M (minus the 1 million commission). Not bad for a silly little dress.

What To Think?

Whether you view “Forever Marilyn” as a trashy tourist come-on, a horrible slight of misogyny, or a symbol of feminine equality, the statue depicts a cultural icon who deserves to be remembered for her complexities just as much as her bubbly blonde-bombshell persona.

Monroe died on August 5, 1962. Nearly sixty years later, she's still in style – and making more money than ever. Her come-hither expression is emblazoned on posters, T-shirts and refrigerator magnets. She's become a multimillion-dollar brand, but that may never have happened if not for the will she left behind, a document that reveals a much quieter – and more complicated – side to her legacy. She is known to be a gracious, loving soul to her legions of undying fans.

So …

Is it Monroe herself, her revealing dress, her modest panties, the temptation to peek from beneath, or what the imagination can't see that draws so much controversy? After all, when you break down the working parts of all the contention, the whole affair seems only mildly distracting. By today's standards, any actual sexual titillation posed by the components seems hardly worth the fuss.

And …

Should perceived transgressions be blamed on the artist Johnson II, the city fathers of Palm Springs, or the voyeuristic tourists? If a fair wind has once again exposed the curvaceous movie star, who is the nastiest patron of the opportunistic breeze?

Is this art in Palm Springs suitable for public consumption? A sexually explicit image generally relates to or describes sexual conduct. “Sexually explicit” means any reference to sexual intercourse, sexual abuse, the genitals, or pubic area of a person.

While the statue may have some “reference” to that certain “area of a person,” it does not expose the naked body. I'm sure most kids today – used to seeing thongs and other skimpy attire – would laugh and say, “Look at that lady's funny-looking underwear. That's so goofy.”

Censorship of explicit images is often motivated by conservative and religious values and fears of moral corruption. And, of course, feminists who challenge objectifying sexual imagery want equal rights for women and fear the spread of objectifying images is detrimental to that cause.

I guess the eye of the beholder judges any real artistic content like technical proficiency, beauty, emotional power, or conceptual ideas. I understand that the principles of art include movement, unity, harmony, variety, balance, contrast, proportion and pattern while the elements include texture, form, space, shape, color, value and line. It's all complicated and pretty subjective to me. However, the controversy over the Monroe statue shows how fine the line between popular art and objectification is and how tricky it is to negotiate a consensus of opinion. Perhaps “the answer, my friend is still out there blowin' in the wind.”

Goodbye Norma Jeane
From the young man in the twenty-second row
Who sees you as something as more than sexual
More than just our Marilyn Monroe

And it seems to me you lived your life
Like a candle in the wind
Never knowing who to cling to
When the rain set in
And I would've liked to known you
But I was just a kid
Your candle burned out long before
Your legend ever did

From “Candle in the Wind” by Elton John




Saturday, June 26, 2021

Structural Racial Truths -- The Disproportionate Deaths of Blacks During COVID-19

 


I used to view White Supremacy as the folks marching in Klan robes, but have come to realize that it is an idea that operates most consequentially as the quiet default, and through systems that make White the ideal, provide White the benefit of the doubt, to the detriment of those who are not White, who are efficiently marked as less valuable in ways that require no shouting.

The phrase 'White Supremacy' is jarring to most Whites and I fear being called ‘a Racist’ as much as almost anything. Sorting the world into Racists and Not Racists lets me off the hook and is a way of perpetuating the pernicious old idea that there is a hierarchy of human value, most commonly marked by race across U.S. history.

The systems operating need to be named and rejected if we are ever to live into the notions of equality, stated as truths in the Declaration of Independence, that remain aspirations worth fighting for today.”

    Don Taylor, Professor of Public Policy (with appointments in Business, Nursing, Community and Family Medicine, and the Duke Clinical Research Institute), and Chair of the Academic Council at Duke University

Let's examine a truth – there exists a disproportionate death toll of Blacks during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The Centers For Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have revealed findings on the disproportionate burden of COVID-19 deaths among some racial and ethnic minority groups. A study of selected states and cities with data on COVID-19 deaths by race and ethnicity showed that 34% of deaths were among non-Hispanic Black people, though this group accounts for only 12% of the total U.S. Population.

L. Holmes, M. Enwere, J. Williams et al. “Black-White Risk Differentials in COVID-19 (SARS-COV2) Transmission, Mortality and Case Fatality in the United States: Translational Epidemiologic Perspective and Challenges.” Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020.)

In Michigan, over 40% of COVID-19 deaths are African Americans, while only 14% of the population is made up of African Americans. This is significant, and these numbers are changing every single day.”

David J. Brown, M.D., associate vice president and associate dean for health equity and inclusion at Michigan Medicine

Whites may ask incredulously “I wonder why that is the case?” and note the presence of comorbidities as an explanation that makes the fact less scandalous. However, Taylor cites threes reasons for this Black/White COVID-19 mortality disparity, and they all flow from the multi-century history of White supremacy in the United States.

Taylor says …

First, Blacks are at higher risk of occupational exposure because they disproportionately work jobs that are deemed essential, but are not paid as such, nor adequately protected on the job.

Second, there are decades of research showing that Blacks are treated differently when seeking health care than are Whites, a phenomenon being reproduced today with COVID19.

And finally, Racism and White Supremacy not only have structural impacts on Black people’s lives (housing, incarceration, income, education, health care) that put them at risk, but there are physiological impacts due to increased allostatic load that result in cellular changes through that is called 'the weathering hypothesis' that have effects on health and mortality independent of factors like poverty among Blacks as compared to Whites.”

(Don Taylor. “Telling the Truth About Race.” Don Taylor's RECKONING BLOG. MAY 29, 2020.)

Taylor concludes: “It is hard and scary but if White people do not speak up, then we are complicit, in direct proportion to our power and influence. I am not sure what to do next. Telling the truth is the best I can do right now.”


Telling the Truth

Let's examine further the truth of structural impacts on Blacks as they relate to the pandemic. The CDC confirms the evidence from the provisional death data of the National Center for Health Statistics and recent studies that clearly illustrate the disproportionate burden of COVID-19 deaths among racial and ethnic minority groups, particularly Hispanic or Latino, non-Hispanic Black, and non-Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native people.

The CDC promotes the following redress: “To prevent deaths from COVID-19, we need to work together to address inequities in the social determinants of health that increase the risk of death from COVID-19 for racial and ethnic minority groups.”

(“COVID-19 Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities.” CDC. December 10, 2020.)

A new study reported in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) confirms older Black Americans hospitalized for COVID-19 face a greater risk of death than their white counterparts because they disproportionately receive care in facilities with worse outcomes for all.

(David A. Asch, MD, MBA1,2; Md Nazmul Islam, PhD, MBA3; Natalie E. Sheils, PhD3,; et al. “Patient and Hospital Factors Associated With Differences in Mortality Rates Among Black and White US Medicare Beneficiaries Hospitalized With COVID-19 Infection.” JAMA Netw Open. 2021 )

After analyzing the health records of 44,217 Medicare Advantage patients (average age 76) hospitalized with COVID-19 from January through Sept. 21, researchers found that the odds of dying within 30 days of hospitalization (or discharge to hospice care) were 11 percent higher for Black patients than for white patients.

As for the reason for the disparity, the study points to differences in the hospitals — rather than the patients — as the major cause.

People often assume that Black-white differences in mortality are due to higher rates of chronic health conditions among Black individuals. But time and again, research has shown that where Black patients get their care is much more important, and that if you account for where people are hospitalized, differences in mortality vanish,” study coauthor Rachel M. Werner, M.D., executive director of the Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics at the University of Pennsylvania, said in a statement.

Because patients tend to go to hospitals near where they live, these new findings tell a story of racial residential segregation and reflect our country’s racial history that has been highlighted by the pandemic,” study coauthor, David Asch, M.D., the executive director of Penn Medicine’s Center for Health Care Innovation, said in a statement.

In a Washington Post column, Asch and Werner wrote that hospitals located in poorer neighborhoods tend to treat more patients who are uninsured or insured by Medicaid with inadequate reimbursement rates.

In effect, doctors and hospitals in the United States are paid less to take care of Black patients than they are paid to take care of white patients. When we talk about structural racism in health care, this is part of what we mean,” they wrote.

(Peter Urban. “Blacks Hospitalized for COVID-19 Face Higher Odds of Death.” AARP. June 24, 2021.)

Allow me to repeat – Doctors and hospitals in the U.S. are “paid less to take care of Black patients than they are to take care of white patients.” That is a classic example of structural racism.

Structural Racism is a system in which public policies, institutional practices, cultural representations, and other norms work in various, often reinforcing ways to perpetuate racial group inequity. It has been part of the social, economic, and political systems in which we all exist. It is part of America’s past and its present.


Weathering Hypothesis

Arline Geronimus, Sc.D., professor of health behavior and health education at the Univerity of Michigan School of Public Health, believes it's completely implausible that there’s one single factor that explains these major differences across populations.

Geronimus coined and has studied the “weathering hypothesis,” which describes what happens to black people’s bodies across body systems and down to the cellular level from living in a racist society.

Geronimus hypothesizes that weathering of the immune system could be contributing to more serious illness in these populations, even across socioeconomic lines. The hypothesis is …

The sustained high effort coping with environmental, psychosocial, and material stressors over years and decades and across generations that Blacks must engage and endure in a racist system leads to cellular damage and accelerated biological aging, resulting in high prevalence and early onset of chronic diseases and increased vulnerability to the worst impacts of infectious disease.”

(A.T. Geronimus. “The weathering hypothesis and the health of African-American women and infants: evidence and speculations.” Ethn Dis. Summer 1992.)

In medical school, when they teach you how to diagnose illness, they say when you hear hoof beats, think horses not zebras. Weathering is the horses and, while complex, is really right in front of our faces; there’s no need to start speculating about an out-sized role of vitamin D deficiency or single genes” Geronimus says.

The weathering hypothesis was initially proposed as a sociological explanation for health disparities, but it is closely related to biological theories like the Allostatic load model, which proposes that an individual's exposure to repeated or chronic stress over their lifetime has physiological consequences which can be measured through various biomarkers.

There is a growing body of evidence implicating the role of elevated allostatic load in adverse pregnancy outcomes among women of color. Some studies argue that there is a moral imperative to assign additional resources to reduce the effects of elevated allostatic load before, during, and after pregnancy to improve the health of women and their children. Traditional explanations for disparate outcomes, such as personal health behaviors, socioeconomic status, health literacy, and access to healthcare, do not sufficiently explain why non-Hispanic Black women continue to die at three to four times the rate of White women during pregnancy, childbirth, or postpartum.

    Kirsten A. Riggan, Anna Gilbert & Megan A. Allyse. “Acknowledging and Addressing Allostatic Load in Pregnancy Care. Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities 8, 69–79. 2021.)

Conclusions

The evidence is strong: naming and rejecting White privilege and structural racism is crucial for implementing societal changes that will save the lives of Black Americans. The disproportionate death toll of Blacks during the COVID-19 pandemic puts crucial statistics squarely before our eyes … there for all of us to see.

But, can we remove ourselves from our own misconceptions and long-held attitudes to face the truth? While almost all of us reject racism in its hideous and easily detectable forms like Klan hoods, knees on necks, and ethnic slurs, many still refuse to acknowledge systematic and structural barriers to equality.

Why?

Indirect, aversive racism is practiced by those who regard themselves as non-prejudiced but, at the same time, who harbor negative feelings and beliefs about members of minority groups. Many of these people may not even be conscious they hold these deep-seated feelings. And, these aversive racists often fear giving up advantages of majority and control. In short, these Whites have privilege but only wish to share if they have the power to grant benefits they deem necessary … thus, simply extending the same system they have controlled all of their lives. The alternative? I think you know.

So, if you think Covid is a left-wing conspiracy; you think it is “just the flu”; and you refuse to take the vaccine – you can be privilege to know one fact: the virus is bigoted as hell. It cuts down minorities to a much greater extent than it does pale faces. I assume White nationalists care little about this unhealthy inequality.

The most effective adaptation of racism over time is the idea that racism is conscious bias held by mean people. This 'good/bad binary,' positing a world of evil racists and compassionate non-racists, is itself a racist construct, eliding systemic injustice and imbuing racism with such shattering moral meaning that white people, especially progressives, cannot bear to face their collusion in it.

(Pause on that, white reader. You may have subconsciously developed your strong negative feelings about racism in order to escape having to help dismantle it.)”

-- Katy Waldman, staff writer at The New Yorker in a review on White Fragility by Robin DiAngelo (2018)


Thursday, June 24, 2021

New York City Kinky Sex Guidelines During COVID -- The "Slutty Summer of 21"

 


Last March, the New York City Department of Health released its first set of guidelines around sex during a global pandemic – then encouraging citizens to avoid group sex altogether as many epidemiological aspects of the novel coronavirus were still being discovered.

Now, more than a year later, they are still trying to make that 'virtual hookups' thing happen: 'Video dates, sexting, sexy Zoom parties or chat rooms' are fine options, the agency hypes in its 2021 guidelines.”

(And, all of this despite the fact NYCDH says currently, there is no evidence that COVID-19 can be transmitted through sex. Other coronaviruses have not spread through sex, which leads them to believe that is the case with this strain.)

(Hannah Sparks. “Get ‘kinky’ with our graphic COVID sex orgy guide: NYC Health Department.” New York Post. June 22, 2021.)

The New York City Department of Health encourages people to get kinky this summer. They have released the latest update to the city’s notoriously graphic guidelines for safer sex during the COVID-19 pandemic.

With New Yorkers well primed to engage. (Data shows that 52% of its residents are already fully vaccinated, and 71% of all adults have received at least one dose.), the agency is urging residents to get creative but “play safer” – especially by getting vaccinated before engaging in what some have dubbed the “slutty summer” of 2021.

But the advice goes much deeper and much more graphic.

Make it kinky,” they suggest. “Be creative with sexual positions and physical barriers, like walls, that allow sexual contact while preventing close face-to-face contact.”

Kinky” is a gross understatement of the content in the guidelines … and, I do mean gross. For example, the health department writes New Yorkers should …

  • Avoid sex parties,” but for those who “insist” on getting their groove fully back this summer, the city explains that it’s imperative to get jabbed before you attend “get-togethers with large groups; have group sex, multiple sex partners or sex with people you do not know.”

  • Pick larger, more open and well-ventilated spaces” for orgy action.

  • Be creative with sexual positions and physical barriers, like walls, that allow sexual contact while preventing close face-to-face contact.”

  • Use condoms and dental dams to reduce contact with saliva, semen, or feces during oral or anal sex or rimming.” (Sorry for the offensive content here, but the purpose of this post is to reveal the actuality of the health department's language and descriptive detail.)

  • Wear a face mask during “parties and other gatherings” and “avoid kissing” as the disease is known to spread via respiratory droplets.

  • Masturbate together and use face coverings to reduce the risk.”

  • Enjoy sex virtually.” such as “video dates, sexting, sexy zoom parties, or chat rooms.”

  • Wash up before and after sex” and “use soap and warm water to clean sex toys.” And, don't forget to “disinfect keyboards and touch screens you share with others.”

(“Safer Sex and Covid-19.” NYC Health. 2021

I guess that about covers everything and much more. But, don't be too quick to develop a sense of sexual security. Now, sexually transmitted diseases are at an all-time high for the sixth year in a row, according to a recent news release by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

What the ???

Despite reports that the frank sexual advice was “just the distraction many people needed as they quickly spread the guide online and shared in a collective giggle over the advised safety measures,” the fact that the New York City Health Department issued the guidelines in such explicit terms (many say a “crude and lewd” description) is troubling. It certainly raises questions about how the tone affects the theme – Covid and STD's are certainly not laughing matters.

Although the guidelines are both timely and helpful, the titillating feel of the release makes one wonder just how horny (or extremely lonely) the authors may be. I mean some of the content is simply overboard, is it not? It's been a long, trying year punctuated by masking, social distancing, and the tremendous fear of social contact. It is good to be lighthearted once more, but just how many people are really getting sex parties or orgies back on their agenda? Maybe more than I can comprehend. After all, this geezer has led a relatively sheltered life. However, I do remember 1967 – the Summer of Love. Maybe 24 years later, Slutty Summer will be another cultural milestone.

"Love The One You're With"

If you're down and confused
And you don't remember who you're talking to
Concentration slip away
Because your baby is so far away

Well there's a rose in a fisted glove
And the eagle flies with the dove
And if you can't be with the one you love, honey
Love the one you're with

Don't be angry - don't be sad
Don't sit crying over good times you've had
There's a girl right next to you
And she's just waiting for something to do

Well there's a rose in a fisted glove
And the eagle flies with the dove
And if you can't be with the one you love honey
Love the one you're with

Turn your heartache right into joy
'Cause she's a girl and you're a boy
Get it together come on make it nice
You ain't gonna need any more advice

Well there's a rose in a fisted glove
And the eagle flies with the dove
And if you can't be with the one you love, honey
Love the one you're with

Stephen Stills (1970)


Wednesday, June 23, 2021

90% With SNAP Food Assistance Struggle to Access Healthy Food

 


Almost 90 percent of people receiving SNAP – the federal food assistance program formerly known as food stamps – are struggling to access healthy food, according to a U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) study released Wednesday.

The nearly 42 million Americans receiving SNAP benefits are one of the most food insecure populations in the country, and more than half responding to a survey said they simply can't afford the kind of nutritious food that makes up a healthy diet, the study revealed. For others surveyed, the top barriers to access included a lack of transportation to a grocery store or the time necessary to cook a healthy meal.”

(Kenzi Abou-Sabe. “Nine out of 10 people who depend on federal food program struggle to access a healthy diet.” NBC News. June 23, 2021.)

Stacy Dean, the USDA's deputy undersecretary for food, nutrition, and consumer services, reports the study indicates that SNAP isn't doing what it's supposed to do.

Dean says, "SNAP benefits are a nutrition lifeline for millions of Americans, so it's vital that the program helps enable participants to achieve a healthy diet amidst the real world challenges they face. The study findings released today indicate that we're not yet there."

SNAP participants were surveyed in 2018 as the result of a 2014 proposal from the USDA's Food and Nutrition Service, based on the idea that more research was needed to understand the barriers to a healthy diet on SNAP. The average SNAP benefit, per person, per meal was about $1.40 at the time of the survey.

During the pandemic, everyone participating in SNAP was bumped up to the maximum benefit of $2 per meal. In March, Congress extended that boost through September as part of the American Rescue Plan. But many experts in food assistance suggested that was merely a Band-Aid.

SNAP Benefits

Your household must meet certain requirements to be eligible for SNAP and receive benefits. If a state agency determines that you are eligible to receive SNAP benefits, you will receive benefits back to the date you submitted your application.

To be eligible for this benefit program in Ohio, you must be a resident of the state and meet one of the following requirements:

  • You have current resources valued at $2,250 or less (examples include savings and checking combined) or

  • You have current resources valued at $3,500 or less (examples include savings and checking combined) and share your household with one of the following:

    • a person or persons age 60 and over or

    • a person with a disability (a child, your spouse, a parent, or yourself).

To be eligible, you must have an annual household income (before taxes) that is below certain amounts:

For example, for a household of 3 in Ohio, you must be below $28.548 (before taxes)

* For households with more than eight people, add $5,902 per additional person. Always check with the appropriate managing agency to ensure the most accurate guidelines.

(“Ohio Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.” Ohio Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program | Benefits.gov.)

The American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 signed by President Joseph R. Biden on March 11, 2021, extends increases to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) maximum allotments from July 1, 2021, through Sept. 30, 2021. The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, raised maximum allotments to 115 percent of the June 2020 value of the Thrifty Food Plan (TFP) from Jan. 1, 2021, through June 30, 2021.

If you are found eligible, you will receive a notice that tells you how long you will receive SNAP benefits for; this is called your certification period. Before your certification period ends, you will receive another notice that says you must recertify to continue receiving benefits. Your local SNAP office will provide you with information about how to recertify.

The USDA Food and Nutrition Service reports SNAP benefits may be used for the following:

Any food for the household, such as

  • Fruits and vegetables;

  • Meat, poultry, and fish;

  • Dairy products;

  • Breads and cereals;

  • Other foods such as snack foods and non-alcoholic beverages; and

  • Seeds and plants, which produce food for the household to eat.

Households CANNOT use SNAP benefits to buy

  • Beer, wine, liquor, cigarettes, or tobacco

  • Vitamins, medicines, and supplements. If an item has a Supplement Facts label, it is considered a supplement and is not eligible for SNAP purchase.

  • Live animals (except shellfish, fish removed from water, and animals slaughtered prior to pick-up from the store).

  • Foods that are hot at the point of sale

  • Any nonfood items such as:
    - Pet foods
    - Cleaning supplies, paper products, and other household supplies.
    - Hygiene items, cosmetics



Diane Whitmore Schanzenbach – director of the Institute for Policy Research at Northwestern University, Margaret Walker Alexander Professor at the University, and Nonresident Senior Fellow at Brookings – cites research that shows the following:

SNAP is a highly efficient and effective program. It lifted nearly 5 million people out of poverty in 2014 (the most recent data available). SNAP is targeted efficiently to families who need benefits the most, reduces the likelihood that families have trouble affording food, and serves as an automatic fiscal stabilizer in times of economic downturns.

It has extremely low rates of both error and fraud. SNAP also has long-term benefits to children. My own recent research study found that those who had access to SNAP benefits during childhood were more likely to graduate from high school, grew up to be healthier, and women in particular were more likely to become economically self-sufficient due to childhood access to SNAP benefit.”

(Sherman, Arloc. 2015, September 16. “Safety Net Programs Lift Millions From Poverty, New Census Data Show.” Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Washington DC.)

(Institute for Research on Poverty. 2015, November. “SNAP, Food Security, and Health.” Policy Brief No. 8, Institute for Research on Poverty, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI.)

(Rosenbaum, Dottie. 2014, July 2. “SNAP Error Rates at All-Time Lows.” Report, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Washington, DC.)

A key reason for SNAP’s success is that it relies on the private sector to provide efficient access to food, through grocery stores and other retail outlets. Schanzenbach also says, “Generally, economists advise policymakers not to interfere in the private market unless there is a compelling reason to do so – such as a market failure or another inefficiency that would be improved through government intervention.

In the case of SNAP, the fundamental problem the program is meant to address is not a market failure, but is instead a lack of resources available to purchase food. Government assistance is needed because some families, generally temporarily, do not have adequate resources to purchase enough food to sustain an active, healthy lifestyle.

When they receive SNAP, participating families have more resources they can use to purchase groceries. Once the fundamental problem of resource adequacy is addressed, recipients can interact with the private market to obtain the food they need.

Schanzenbach believes additional restrictions on SNAP purchases will undermine the effectiveness and the efficiency of the program.

(Diane Whitmore Schanzenbach. “Pros and cons of restricting SNAP purchases.” Brookings. February 16, 2017.)

However, Schanzenback also cites better policy options that are more likely to improve the diets of SNAP recipients, particularly when you consider that, over the past decade, fresh fruits and vegetables have become relatively more expensive compared to foods that are considered less healthy. In response, market-based policies can increase the affordability of healthy foods and provide incentives for low-income families to purchase them.

Schanzenbach says …

One approach that merits further consideration is the USDA’s randomized controlled trial of the Healthy Incentives Pilot in Massachusetts. This pilot program gave SNAP recipients an immediate 30-cent rebate for every dollar they spent on a narrowly defined group of fruits and vegetables. In response to this price rebate, consumption of the targeted healthy foods increased by 25 percent.

In recent years, many local areas and even a few states have taken a similar approach by awarding bonus dollars for benefits used at farmers’ markets, allowing recipients to stretch their food budget farther when they buy fresh produce. To date, these programs have been successful. Exploring ways to replicate or scale these types of programs nationally would provide a more constructive and effective path forward toward achieving the goal of increasing healthy food consumption by SNAP recipients.” 

(Diane Whitmore Schanzenbach. “Pros and cons of restricting SNAP purchases.” Brookings. February 16, 2017.)

Another success? A state SNAP-Ed curriculum called Body Quest applies what Sondra Parmer, the administrator of SNAP-Ed programs for the Alabama Cooperative Extension System, calls “multilevel intervention.” It has had a significant impact on children and families since its launch in 2010.

SNAP-Ed is a companion program that provides comprehensive nutrition education to many of the same families, who may be struggling to put together healthy meals on a limited budget.

When we look at the data for the program, we can say with certainty—because we’re comparing a treatment and a control group—that because of Body Quest, these kids are eating better,” said Parmer.

Now, a new study has aggregated data across eight states in the Southeast to evaluate the broader impact of programs like these for the first time. Published in the Journal of Nutritional Science at the end of September 2020, the study found adults and children in SNAP-Ed programs are more likely to make a number of positive behavior changes, including eating more fruit and vegetables.

(Lisa Held. “Nutrition Education is Helping Low-Income Families Eat Healthier.” Civil Eats. October 20, 2020.)

Conclusion

We all feel pressure to eat healthier food. As fast food outlets offer cheap meals and as more and more people work, money and time enter into the equation. I can't imagine how a poor family feeds itself these days. Groceries are so costly and working parents have very little time to prepare food for their active families. 

Still, it is very troubling to hear that so many people that receive public assistance are suffering. Uncle Sam's help in properly feeding the population reaps tremendous benefits. Strengthening SNAP and reducing food insecurity for the more than 42 million Americans that receive nutritional assistance on a monthly basis is a smart public investment that will improve both public health and economic growth.

In a nation of 331.5 million, between one-seventh and one-eighth of the people need a little boost in their food dollars to survive. We should continue to help them find answers to their nutritional problems. We can and we should do a better job.

Dispelling One Final Myth – Work and Benefits

SNAP has two sets of work requirements. If you are age 16 – 59 and able to work, you will probably need to meet the general work requirements to get SNAP benefits. The general work requirements include registering for work, participating in SNAP Employment and Training (E&T) or workfare if assigned by your state SNAP agency, taking a suitable job if offered, and not voluntarily quitting a job or reducing your work hours below 30 a week without a good reason.

You are excused from the general work requirements if you are any one of these things:

  • Already working at least 30 hours a week (or earning wages at least equal to the federal minimum wage multiplied by 30 hours)

  • Meeting work requirements for another program (TANF or unemployment compensation)

  • Taking care of a child under 6 or an incapacitated person

  • Unable to work due to a physical or mental limitation

  • Participating regularly in an alcohol or drug treatment program

  • Studying in school or a training program at least half-time (but college students are subject to other eligibility rules).

(“SNAP Work Requirements.” USDA Food and Nutrition Service.)