Friday, December 31, 2021

Who Dies From COVID-19? Do You Really Care?

 

I am a covid veteran
This is a different kind of war
A war some don’t believe in

A war some mock, a “hoax”
The trauma is real
The dying is real
Running down the halls one room after another
“put your mask back on”
“stop pulling on lines”
Mitts
“You have to keep your mask on”
“Your daughter is coming in the morning, don’t you want to see her?”
The goal is to keep that one alive
“long enough”
For his daughter to be here when they turn the oxygen off.
“Let’s just get him to morning.”

There's that name I will never forget
the first in a growing line,
they declined for a time the use of their O2 device
I had to take it
I gave it to another, “more likely to survive”
This one lives
That one dies

They all suffer

The look in their eyes
As they learn the rules of an unfamiliar game
From room air to nasal cannula
NC to oxymask
Non-rebreather
Highflo
Bipap
Max it out
“I can’t breathe!”

I know you can’t breathe

I know
“I know it’s uncomfortable,”
“I know it’s blasting air in your face.”
“I’ll gladly take it off, just do me a favor,
change your code status first.”
“I have a line of people waiting for that machine, if you aren’t going to keep it on”
“I need you to change your code status first”
“What else can be done?”
“Intubation is next”

That look on their face

Excerpt from a poem by Sara McDonald

Sara McDonald takes care of COVID-19 patients at St. Luke's in Boise. She works in the telemetry – or cardiac – unit.

"We have a tendency to take the more difficult, or sicker, patients that have COVID," McDonald said. "They're on more oxygen, their needs are more acute."

Some of that unit is an overflow ICU, so she does tasks for the ICU-trained nurses there. The patients on that floor are intubated.

"They're not aware their bodies are hooked up to machines that are breathing for them," McDonald said.

Other days, she works with patients in the telemetry unit that are not intubated. It can be a higher-anxiety environment. The patients are conscious, McDonald said, but often hooked up to high-flow oxygen machines, which can be uncomfortable for them.

McDonald went home after a particularly taxing night on that floor recently and went to bed. When she woke up, a lump of stress in her throat was still there, so she started typing a poem.

"I just did a free-write, and I just hammered it out, you know, bawling," McDonald said.

She said she needed to share what health care workers are going through.

"We're in a war zone three days a week, and then the other four days of the week, we're expected to just go back to normal social life and attend gatherings and, you know, meet friends at the park and go to barbecues. And it's just not a flip you can switch," she said.

Part of McDonald's poem above shows that “war zone” in detail. Please read her entire poem by clicking here: https://npr.brightspotcdn.com/b7/cc/87930bc54bd1882b1a6e48add5cf/untitled-document-9.pdf.

Dealing With COVID-19

The New York Times and “Our World In Data” report as of December 29, 2021, over 822,000 people in the United States have died from COVID-19. This staggering statistic begs a question: Who is dying from the virus?

It stands to reason that anti-vaxxers and careless individuals who refuse to follow health directives greatly increase the numbers of people who become infected and die from the disease. One stark reality about this carelessness is that ageism reduces human beings’ capacity for caring.

Also people who believe falsehoods about the virus continue to seek out information that confirms their beliefs. They work hard to reject or dismiss any information that opposes those beliefs. And, amazingly, sociologists say trying to fight someone's cognitive dissonance rarely works. People double down on their beliefs when they are challenged, a concept known as the "backfire effect."

Any way you slice or dice the reasons for the lack of empathy leading people to be non-believers in science, people die from this gross disregard. During this pandamic it is evident that some care about themselves and not others who are more likely to suffer from the virus, and … no amount of shaming or exposure to that fact can change their views.

I know this as I write the entry. I will not persuade anyone to change their views about COVID. People strive to make sense out of contradictory ideas and lead lives that are, at least in their own minds, consistent and meaningful. The theory of cognitive dissonance tells us that as people justify each step taken after their original decision, they will find it harder to admit they were wrong at the outset. Especially when the end result proves self-defeating, wrongheaded, or harmful.

I still want to write this entry. Why? We all need to know the truth. We must establish the facts about how this deadly virus spreads and kills so many. Maybe those of us who practice safety precautions and empathy can benefit from understanding who dies. After all, innocent victims fall tragically to the virus every day.

We should use facts to increase our critical understandings. Consider this information about the immune system and the vast exposure to COVID-19 …

Scientists have long known that viruses and the immune system compete in a sort of arms race, with viruses evolving ways to evade the immune system and even suppress its response. Interferons serve as the body's first line of defense against infection, sounding the alarm and activating an army of virus-fighting genes.

In an international study in Science, 10 percent of nearly 1,000 Covid-19 patients who developed life-threatening pneumonia had antibodies that disable key immune system proteins called interferons. These antibodies – known as autoantibodies, because they attack the body itself – weren't found at all in 663 people with mild or asymptomatic Covid-19 infections. Only four of 1,227 healthy patients had the autoantibodies. The study was led by the Covid Human Genetic Effort, which includes 200 research centers in 40 countries.

(Paul Bastard et al. “Autoantibodies against type I IFNs in patients with life-threatening COVID-19.” Science Vol 370, Issue 6515. September 24, 2020.)

In a second Science study by the same team, the authors found that an additional 3.5 percent of critically ill patients had mutations in genes that control the interferons involved in fighting viruses. Given that the body has 500 to 600 of those genes, it's possible that researchers will find more mutations, said Qian Zhang, lead author of the second study.

(Qian Zhang et al. “Inborn errors of type I IFN immunity in patients with life-threatening COVID-19.” Science Vol 370, Issue 6515. September 24, 2020.)

Who Dies From COVID-19?

Older People

By August 2020 several studies revealed that age is by far the strongest predictor of an infected person’s risk of dying – a metric known as the infection fatality ratio (IFR), which is the proportion of people infected with the virus, including those who didn’t get tested or show symptoms, who will die as a result.

However, recent studies dispute the claim that only the very old are likely victims.

COVID-19 is not just hazardous for elderly people, it is extremely dangerous for people in their mid-fifties, sixties and seventies,” says Andrew Levin, an economist at Dartmouth College in Hanover, New Hampshire, who has estimated that getting COVID-19 is more than 50 times more likely to be fatal for a 60-year-old than is driving a car.

But “age cannot explain everything,” says Henrik Salje, an infectious-disease epidemiologist at the University of Cambridge, UK. Gender is also a strong risk factor, with men almost twice more likely to die from the coronavirus than women.

(Smriti Mallapaty. “The coronavirus is most deadly if you are older and male — new data reveal the risks.” Nature. August 28, 2020.)

People With Pre-existing Conditions

Early on, in 2020, just months into the pandemic, scientists identified some clear patterns in which people who suffer from Covid-19 are most likely to die. Pre-existing medical conditions are one important factor – especially among lower-income workers who suffer from these conditions.

Data on pre-existing conditions with other evidence shows comorbidities that are supported by at least one meta-analysis or systematic review or by a review method defined in the Scientific Evidence brief.

These conditions include cancer, cerebrovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, chronic lung diseases, chronic liver disease, diabetes mellitus, heart conditions (such as heart failure, coronary artery disease, or cardiomyopathies), mental health disorders, obesity, pregnancy and recent pregnancy, smoking – current and former, and tuberculosis.

(“People with Certain Medical Conditions.” Centers For Disease Control and Prevention. December 14, 2021.)

As of June 3, 2020, roughly nine in ten New Yorkers and Chicagoans who died of Covid-19 suffered from underlying chronic conditions. But those underlying conditions don’t affect everyone equally. They are much more prevalent among lower-income workers, according to researchers at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Rates of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, kidney disease and diabetes, for example, among the poorest 10 percent of New Yorkers are estimated to be more that 40 percent higher than the median rate.

In cities across the United States, people with the lowest incomes have considerably higher rates of diabetes, obesity, asthma, high blood pressure, and kidney and pulmonary disease — conditions that put Covid-19 patients at a higher risk of severe illness.

(Yaryna Serkez. “Who Is Most Likely to Die From the Coronavirus?” The New York Times. June 04, 2020.)


The Unvaccinated

Recent research reported by the Texas Department of State Health Services (November 2021) claimed unvaccinated people were 20 times more likely to experience COVID-19-associated death than fully vaccinated people.

The department concluded that vaccination had a strong protective effect on infections and deaths among people of all ages. The protective impact on infections was consistent across adult age groups and even greater in people ages 12 to 17 years. The protective impact on COVID-19 deaths, which was high for all age groups, varied more widely.

In the September time frame, unvaccinated people in their 40s were 55 times more likely to die from COVID-19 compared with fully vaccinated people of the same age. Unvaccinated people aged 75 years and older were 12 times more likely to die than their vaccinated counterparts.

Overall, regardless of vaccination status, people in Texas were four to five times more likely to become infected with COVID-19 or suffer a COVID-19-associated death while the Delta variant was prevalent in Texas (August 2021) compared with a period before the Delta variant became prevalent (April 2021).

The protective effect of vaccination is most noticeable among younger groups. During September, the risk of COVID-19 death was 23 times higher in unvaccinated people in their 30s and 55 times higher for unvaccinated people in their 40s.

In addition, there were fewer than 10 COVID-19 deaths in September among fully vaccinated people between ages 18-29, as compared with 339 deaths among unvaccinated people in the same age group.

Then, looking at a longer time period -- from Jan. 15 to Oct. 1 -- the researchers found that unvaccinated people were 45 times more likely to contract COVID-19 than fully vaccinated people. The protective effect of vaccination against infection was strong across all adult age groups but greatest among ages 12-17.

 (“COVID-19 Cases And Deaths by Vaccination Status.” Texas Department of State Health Services. November 8, 2021.)

And something we always suspected but now is supported. Recent polling shows that partisanship is now this single strongest identifying predictor of whether someone is vaccinated.

People in counties that voted for Donald Trump are nearly three times more likely to die from Covid-19 than those who live in counties that voted for Joe Biden, according to a new study by National Public Radio.

The study found that areas that voted for Trump by at least 60% in November 2020 had death rates 2.7 times higher than counties that voted heavily for Biden.

(Daniel Wood and Geoff Brumfiel. “Pro-Trump counties now have far higher COVID death rates. Misinformation is to blame.” NPR. December 5, 2021.)

Obese Individuals

Dozens of studies since the pandemic began have reported that many of the sickest COVID-19 patients have been people with obesity. In recent weeks, that link has come into sharper focus as large new population studies have cemented the association and demonstrated that even people who are merely overweight are at higher risk.

For example, in the first metaanalysis of its kind, published on 26 August in Obesity Reviews, an international team of researchers pooled data from scores of peer-reviewed papers capturing 399,000 patients. They found that people with obesity who contracted SARS-CoV-2 were 113% more likely than people of healthy weight to land in the hospital, 74% more likely to be admitted to an ICU, and 48% more likely to die.

((Barry M. Popkin, Shufa Du, William D. Green, Melinda A. Beck, et al. “Individuals with obesity and COVID-19: A global perspective on the epidemiology and biological relationships.” Obesity Reviews. Volume 21, Issue 11. August 26, 2020.)

Minorities and Those With Mood Disorders

U.S. studies in JAMA Network Open today detail disparities in COVID-19 deaths in 2020, showing higher mortality rates among racial minorities. Mortality risk is 1.9-fold higher for Black individuals and 2.3-fold higher for Hispanic/Latino individuals compared with White non-Hispanic individuals.

(Justin M. Feldman, ScD; Mary T. Bassett, MD, MPH, et al. “Variation in COVID-19 Mortality in the US by Race and Ethnicity and Educational Attainment” JAMA Netw Open. November 23, 2021.)

Site of care is associated with the higher mortality rate in Black patients. This should not be interpreted as evidence that there was no differential treatment of Black and White patients within individual hospitals. However, it does suggest that although disparities are usually due to a combination of who you are (individual characteristics) and where you go for care (structural factors), for outcomes after COVID-19 hospitalization, the latter plays the larger role and must be addressed if we are to eliminate disparities.

(David W. Baker, MD, MPH. “Breaking Links in the Chain of Racial Disparities for COVID-19. JAMA Netw Open. June 17, 2021.)


And, The Pandemic's “Perfect Victims”

Nearly 18,000 more dialysis patients died in 2020 than would have been expected based on previous years – they were COVID-19’s perfect victims. That staggering toll represents an increase of nearly 20% from 2019, when more than 96,000 patients on dialysis died, according to federal data released this month by the United States Renal Data System 2021 Annual Data Report (ADR).

The loss led to an unprecedented outcome: The nation’s dialysis population shrank, the first decline since the U.S. began keeping detailed numbers nearly a half century ago. Many are old and poor. They also are disproportionately Black. A 2017 study called end-stage renal disease “one of the starkest examples of racial/ethnic disparities in health.”

Those inequities carried through to the pandemic. Dialysis patients who were Black or Latino, according to federal data, suffered higher rates of COVID-19 by every metric: infection, hospitalization, death. Their deaths went largely unnoticed.

Consider that to get their treatments, the majority of dialysis patients in the U.S. must leave the relative safety of their homes and travel to a facility, often with strangers on public or medical transportation. Once at the dialysis center, they typically gather together in a large room for three to four hours.

The fear of contracting the virus was enough to keep many from venturing out for medical care, including those already on dialysis and those set to get the treatment for the first time. Exactly how long patients can go without dialysis depends on a number of factors, but doctors generally begin to worry if they miss two of their thrice-weekly sessions.

(Duaa Eldeib. “They Were the Pandemic’s Perfect Victims.” ProPublica. December 28, 2021.)

 

Conclusion

Who is dying from the virus? I'm sure many of you knew the answer to the question before reading this blog entry. However, I hope now you better understand the dire need to protect the most vulnerable. Do we with empathy pick up the slack for those who simply don't care? I've always heard “Let your conscience be your guide.” Face a very sad truth: No one can exercise the right of conscience for someone else. All we can do is act for the sake of people's life and health.

Why so many people have given up on taking the vaccine, masking, social distancing, and adhering to other simple precautions to protect those most prone to suffer and die is an indication of the prevalence of selfishness in 21st century American human nature.

More than 90% of U.S. counties have now climbed back into "substantial" or "high" transmission of the disease, the levels at which the CDC has urged all Americans to wear masks in public while indoors.

"I need to be very clear, vaccines alone will not get any country out of this crisis. Countries can and must prevent the spread of Omicron with measures that work today," said Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, the World Health Organization's director-general.

Despite resistance to taking necessary precautions and refusing to practice a greater awareness that COVID carelessness contributes to infection to a significant segment of the population, people continue to refuse to adhere to simple health directives.

Jacob Sutherland of The San Diego Union-Tribune writes …

Empathy is often regarded as incompatible with “American individualism.” As Kennedy noted, however, empathy in and of itself is an American principle with which we as individuals can and must use our constitutionally derived freedoms to pursue unabated.

Mask wearing, social distancing and hand washing have been weaponized by some within the political sphere as partisan issues, but the nature of these public health measures are rooted in the decolonial, and American, standard of empathy which seeks to right the wrongs of the past, whether those wrongs be committed by colonizers or covidizers.”

(Jacob Sutherland. “Commentary: Americans’ selfish behavior during COVID-19 is rooted in colonialism.” The San Diego Union-Tribune. December 15, 2020.)

That core principle of individualism in American culture is causing significant health consequences across the country. Listen and you will hear resistance grounded in statements like “The government can’t tell me what to do” or “I’m young and not afraid of contracting the virus” or even one of the conspiracies like “The pandemic is being manipulated by the ‘deep state.’”

Have you ever heard one of these individuals say “Infect me with the virus. I want to risk dying for my proud independence.” I haven't. If you have, please instruct that “brave” individual to read this blog entry before contracting the disease. It just may save his or her life.

Selfishness

Find if you can one victory
That little minds have ever won.
There is no record there to read
Of men who fought for self alone,
No instance of a single deed
Splendor they may proudly own.

Through all life's story you will find
The miser-with his hoarded gold-
A hermit, dreary and unkind,
An outcast from the human fold.
Men hold him up to view with scorn,
A creature by his wealth enslaved,
A spirit craven and forlorn,
Doomed by the money he has saved.

No man was ever truly great
Who sought to serve himself alone,
Who put himself above the state,
Above the friends about him thrown.
No man was ever truly glad
Who risked his joy on hoarded pelf,
And gave of nothing that he had
Through fear of needing it himself.

For selfishness is wintry cold,
And bitter are its joys at last,
The very charms it tries to hold,
With woes are quickly overcast.
And only he shall gladly live,
And bravely die when God shall call,
Who gathers but that he may give,
And with his fellows shares his all.

Edgar Albert Guest



Thursday, December 30, 2021

A Long Time Comin' -- The Ace of Cups Rocks the World

 

Members of the all-female ’60s San Francisco psychedelic rock band Ace of Cups, who have reunited to release their first proper album. Photo: Lisa Law / 1967

The Haight-Ashbury of 1967 was a place of endless possibility: new ways of living, an influx of ideas, and political and cultural revolution were in the air. And yet amidst this “anything goes” scene, one band still stuck out as an anomaly.”

(Kelly Whalen. “Meet the Ace of Cups, the Haight’s (almost) forgotten all-girl band.” PBS. September 06, 2017.)

This is one of the most remarkable stories about rock music that I have ever read. It is about arguably the first all-female rock band of importance. Let me share some information about the Ace of Cups and their dream deferred.

The five-member Ace of Cups was based in San Francisco at the height of the Haight, when the neighborhood in the ’60s was known for its outsider art and hippie culture.

The five original Cups – Denise Kaufman, Mary Ellen Simpson, Diane Vitalich, Mary Gannon and Marla Hunt (Hunt is not involved now) – met amid the haze of Haight-Ashbury on New Year’s Eve in 1966. Then in their late teens or early 20s, they were in school or held clerical day jobs.

Long-time journalist Michele Willens writes …

Gannon, a former Miss Monterey, was working in an all-night doughnut shop, Simpson was studying art at a city college and Kaufman was employed at Fantasy Records, the label famous for its association with Creedence Clearwater Revival. But their passion was making music, and once they merged, they would often practice in Fantasy’s upstairs studio. Eventually, they landed a manager and started getting gigs in venues like the Avalon and the Fillmore.”

(Michele Willens. “A dream deferred: Pioneering all-female rock band Ace of Cups is finally having its moment.” Los Angeles Times. November 27, 2018.)

Thus, the scene’s first and only all-female act was born. The music this openly-feminist group made was phenomenal. The Cups music was raucous, rebellious, funny and loud. The band naturally fell into five-part harmonies, sharing lead vocals, and played the music that they wrote. Their messages of equal rights, decommodification (standard of living). and female empowerment were in line with the major social issues of the era. If you were around in their heyday, the Ace of Cups were already legends.

Katie Bain of The Guardian explains …

They’re the band that opened for Jimi Hendrix in Golden Gate Park in the summer of 1967, just days after Hendrix burned his name into history at the Monterey Pop Festival. They’re the band that opened for the Band during the latter group’s three-night run at Winterland Ballroom in 1968. They’re the band that was friends with and peers of Quicksilver Messenger Service, The Grateful Dead, Jefferson Airplane and other icons of the mythically heady and musically prolific 1960s San Francisco scene.”

(Katie Bain. “Ace of Cups: the 1960s all-female band finally record their first album.” The Guardian. August 27, 2018.)

But the summers of love eventually ended, and by 1972, the Ace of Cups’ moment had passed. And, the band went their separate ways.

Willens shares their individual stories. She writes ...

None more so than Kaufman, who dropped out of UC Berkeley (where she was arrested in the free-speech protests) at 18, and temporarily hopped on Ken Kesey’s Merry Pranksters bus. At various points, she was apparently the focus of many a famous male’s life. (Hint: Check out the current biographies of Paul Simon and Jann Wenner)

Simpson moved to northern California, returned to school, and eventually became a substance abuse and mental health specialist. Gannon also went back to college and became a music teacher. Vitalich stayed in Marin, cleaned houses three days a week, and became a practitioner of shiatsu massage, and Kaufman moved part time to Kauai, where she started an organic farm, which is still operating, and with six local women opened a private school for kindergartners to 12th graders. She later became a Bikram yoga instructor, and her celebrity clientele has included Madonna, Quincy Jones. Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, and Jane Fonda.”

(Michele Willens. “A dream deferred: Pioneering all-female rock band Ace of Cups is finally having its moment.” Los Angeles Times. November 27, 2018.)

The women were also having babies, and with families to care for there was greater concern that the Ace of Cups as a commercial enterprise was never going to take off.

In order to play and tour, you have to be able to have childcare, and we just couldn’t figure out how to handle it all,” Kaufman says. While men in the scene were starting families and still touring freely, the women didn’t have this luxury and, by 1972, the Ace of Cups had splintered.

Here comes the kicker. Are you ready?

The Ace of Cups never scored a record deal. Despite their impact in San Francisco, in the intervening years the Ace of Cups were relegated to footnote status, all but written out of history books … until now.

Kaufman believes was due to the fact that label execs didn’t know how to market a rock band made up of five female lead singers in top hats and paisley.

We were hippie girls,” she says. “I don’t know what that looked like to these guys that came in their suits from Los Angeles and New York.”

But now, with each of the women of Ace of Cups in her 70s, the band has been re-discovered thanks largely to George Wallace, the founder of the New York-based label High Moon Records.

I kept seeing the words ‘Ace of Cups’ (on posters) and wondered what that meant,” Wallace recalls. “I truly thought it might be a catering company.”

Alec Palao, a writer, archivist and ’60s music aficionado (Ace Records' “Man on the West Coast) who has worked with various record labels on reissues from the era, in 2003 tracked down some Ace of Cups private recordings and started promoting them. He eventually caught the attention of Wallace.

Always obsessed with the San Francisco scene, Wallace finally heard It’s Bad For You But Buy It, a compilation of Ace of Cups bootlegs released by Big Beat Records in 2003.

While he was launching his label, Wallace planned a trip out west to look for musical buried treasure that High Moon might re-release. At the time, the Ace of Cups were getting together to play the 75th birthday of counterculture figure Wavy Gravy, and when Wallace saw them rock this event, he knew he had struck gold.

The discussion shifted to, ‘Wait a minute, you guys are starting to play and rehearse, why don’t we make the album that should have been made 50 years ago?’’ Wallace says.

(Katie Bain. “Ace of Cups: the 1960s all-female band finally record their first album.” The Guardian. August 27, 2018.)

So, Wallace agreed to release an album and set out to find the right studio producer. The Cups lobbied for a woman but were satisfied when Dan Shea was enlisted. He had worked successfully with female artists like Mariah Carey, Celine Dion and Jennifer Lopez, and had Northern California roots.

Shea and Wallace knew instinctively that an album just for nostalgic purposes would not be enough: that the songs – most have their beginnings in the ’60s, though a few are new – had to stand alone.

Some of the songs are virtually unchanged from the way they played them in the late ’60s,” says Shea, “and others went through some major rewrites. That can be a difficult thing if people have lived with a song for 50 years and then suddenly some guy says, ‘OK, the verse should actually be the chorus, this one verse should be the bridge, and the introduction should be the verse.’”

(Michele Willens. “A dream deferred: Pioneering all-female rock band Ace of Cups is finally having its moment.” Los Angeles Times. November 27, 2018.)

The result is a double album with 21 tracks and contributions from some old friends – and fans – like Bob Weir, Taj Mahal and Buffy St. Marie. The final sound is a combination of rock, folk and blues with a garage-band sensibility. “I like to say it’s trans-genre,” says Kaufman. The recordings go a long way toward correcting the history of rock.

This is a dream deferred,” says Denise Kaufman, who plays guitar, bass and harmonica and has written much of the group’s material. Adds longtime fan Jackson Browne, “I’ve been waiting 45 years for the debut.”

For Kaufman, it's kismet, with the group’s anti-war and higher consciousness themes as relevant today as they were when the Ace of Cups were playing for tripping hippies in the park. To see four gray-haired women, a sort of Ya-Ya Sisterhood of the Haight, rocking together certainly feels like an extension of the female empowerment ideals that guided their work.

Ace of Cups members always prided themselves on refusing to go softer or sexier or to be backed up by men. Now, of course, they face another potential enemy: ageism.

All are proudly gray, and as Vitalich says, “We just want to look the best we can for our age, and we are finding it empowering to not try to be what we used to be.”

The goals now are to sell some records, perhaps have their music used in film and television, and even find new young listeners. Or maybe even a Grammy.

Conclusion

I am a student of rock history and an avid music collector, especially in tune to the genre's offerings of the 1960s. As someone turning 71 in February, it is inconceivably to me how the Ace of Cups escaped my attention. Why in the world did I never hear their music until the last couple of years? I hope this blog entry explains that omission to some degree.

If you, like me, love 60s rock, you simply have to buy the recent offerings of the Ace of Cups.

The band ROCKS! And, I mean this with all of my musical heart and brain. Listening to their music is both a trip backward and a look forward – a delightful journey in sound through genuine musicianship. This band is not a “girl group” or simply a pure harmony act. They are a solid, rocking band that plays a wide variety of styles – rock, blues, folk, and, as Janis Joplin said before launching into “Mercedes Benz,” – “songs of great social and political import.”

The Ace of Cups music honors femininity, love, and sensuality. But don't get bogged down in descriptions of themes. Find their music and listen. The three offerings below feature great songs and beautiful production. How in the world didn't these ladies burst onto the recording scene in the 60s with music like this? This band gives the Runaways, Joan Jett, and the Bangles stiff competition. And, they preceded all of those iconic female rock acts.

Here is their brief discography:

It’s Bad For You But Buy It! (2003)

Ace of Cups (2018)

Sing Your Dreams (2020)

Here is the Ace of Cups website: https://www.aceofcups.com/

Music critic, author of the bestselling Summer of Love, and award-winning journalist Joel Selvin says the talent and energy that set the band apart 50 years ago still shines through. "Ace of Cups today are this vibrant, exciting time capsule that lives in the contemporary world" he says

(Allyson McCabe. “Ace Of Cups Gets A First Chance At An Overdue Debut.” NPR. January 09, 2019.)

Music”


Music, music, music


Everything will be all right

 

I call my baby on the telephone,

Just to let him know that hes not alone

We got no money and so many bills to pay,

I wonder will we make another day


And then my baby says,

He says "Girl

All you've got to do in this whole world is play

Music, prettiest that you can

Music, snap your fingers clap your hand

Music, laugh and let your heart feel glad,

Everything will be all right”

 

Now we got no money to pay the rent,

And what we earn tonight, well it's already spent

My baby says Don't worry if times get hard,

Just before the dawn it always gets this dark (don't ya know)”


And when it gets so black you think the end is near,

Well that's when all the stars appear

Just like music, they light up the land,

Music, snap your fingers clap your hand,

Music, laugh and let your heart feel glad,

Everything will be all right (I can believe it)

Everything will be all right

(Just have faith that) everything will be all right,

Everything will be all right


By the Ace of Cups

 


Wednesday, December 29, 2021

Words Truly Come And Go -- "The Snoutfair Lass Eschewed Her Louppelande To Maunder In the Apricity"

 

I often wondered when I cursed,
Often feared where I would be --
Wondered where she’d yield her love,
When I yield, so will she.
I would her will be pitied!
Cursed be love! She pitied me …

This so-called “square poem” by Lewis Carroll appeared several decades after his death in 1898. It contains many hallmarks of Carroll’s love of wordplay.

Its six lines each contain six words that together form a word square that can be read both horizontally and vertically: reading downwards, the first word of each line reads the same as the first line itself, the second word of each line reproduces the second line of the poem, and so on. Try it. 

By the way, I'll leave it up to you to figure out the title of this blog entry. I bet its not what you think. Look it up if you dare.  

A logophile is a person who loves words. Do you love words? I do. As a language arts teacher, I am happy delving into the mysterious world of etymology – the study of the origins of words. If you like words and everything they entail like me, I want to talk with you today about “the smallest sequence of phonemes that can be uttered in isolation with objective or practical meaning.” Or words … just plain old words.

As an introduction for this blog entry, you may like to listen to this Ted clip of language historian Anne Curzan speaking about how people use words … and by how all of this changes. In this clip, Curzan gives a charming look at the humans behind dictionaries, and the choices they make. Click the link below to listen to Curzan's "What Makes a Word 'Real'" talk. (Highly recommended)

https://www.ted.com/talks/anne_curzan_what_makes_a_word_real?referrer=playlist-words_words_words

Are you ever at a loss for words? Something in your brain just won't spark a connection and allow you to speak or write. Did you know that words, themselves, can be “lost”?

There is actually an online “Compendium of Lost Words,” a component of The Phrontistery. A phrontistery (from the Greek phrontistes 'thinker') is meant to be a thinking-place for reflection and intellectual stimulation.

The Compendium lists over 400 of the rarest modern English words – in fact, ones that have been entirely absent from the Internet, including all online dictionaries, until now. The administrator encourages an appreciation of the flexibility of English vocabulary. Click on this link to take you to the four main Compendium pages, organized alphabetically by word, or on the links for more information about the site: https://phrontistery.info/clw.html.

Lost Positives

Ellen Higgins, Ph.D. – professional writer, editor, researcher, and educator/trainer – introduces us to the world of words, in particular words known as “lost positives.” A lost positive is just that – a word lost to the language once paired with a negative that still exists. Whether its a tendency of our culture towards pessimism or some other unknown stimulus, English seems less apt to use compliments but ever ready to deliver insults.

Let's look at Higgins example of the lost word “gruntled.” Of course, the opposite is the often-used word “disgruntled” meaning “unhappy, annoyed, and disappointed about something.”

Higgins explains …

In 1999, William Safire (American author, columnist, journalist, and presidential speechwriter) asked in his New York Times On Language column, 'How come you don’t ever hear about gruntled employees? Those of us in the scandal mongering dodge rely heavily on disgruntled former employees for leaks, tips and other often-slanderous leads'

Safire quotes The Oxford English Dictionary (OED) which defines gruntle as 'to grumble, murmur, complain' and provides a quote from a 1589 sermon by Robert Bruce: 'It becomes us not to have our hearts here gruntling upon this earth.'

But Joseph Piercy, in the vocabulary book A Word a Day, states that gruntle came from the grunt sounds made by animals, particularly pigs. Piercy provides an example from an early 14th century fantastical book, The Travels of John Mandeville, in which natives near the Garden of Eden look hideous and “gruntle like swine” – a source also noted by O’Conner and Kellerman on grammarphobia.com.”

(Ellen Higgins, Ph.D. “Lost positives and false negatives – disgruntled and inflammable.” Writing Essentials by Ellen. writingessentialsbyellen.com.)

Here is an example from the 1931 W. P. Webb book The Great Plains: “They were gruntled with a good meal and good conversation.” Despite appearances of gruntled, the word is far from common and even MS Word marks it with the red squiggly “misspelling” underline.

Word History Note:

According to merriam-webster.com, the word disgruntle has been around since 1682 with the meaning “to make ill-humored or discontented,” similar to the earlier gruntle, “which is why gruntled wasn’t originally the opposite [false positive] of disgruntled.” Dis- is commonly a negative prefix (as in the words disability, disbar, discontent, dislike, disown).  But in the case of disgruntle (and also discombobulate), dis- is an intensifying or amplifying prefix: dis- plus the older word gruntled (meaning “to grumble”).

Gruntled, notes merriam-webster.com, in the older sense of “to grumble” is now used only in British dialect. However, in the 20th-century, gruntled began appearing in an upbeat sense, meaning ‘”to put in a good humor” or “pleasing, satisfied, contented.” In what several sources call a “back formation” from disgruntle, the false positive gruntle is “born again” (OED, merriam-webster.com, New Fowler’s).

(Ellen Higgins, Ph.D. “Lost positives and false negatives – disgruntled and inflammable.” Writing Essentials by Ellen. writingessentialsbyellen.com.)

I bet you didn't know the history of words could be so complicated. Are you disgruntled or gruntled yet with this entry? No matter, let me continue, please. I promise not to draw things out too long.

In the site “World Wide Words,” Michael Quinion gives us lots of word information and investigation into the language. Check out the site for interesting reading. Find it here: https://www.worldwidewords.org/index.htm

Allow me to share some of Quinion's lost positive peculiarities in the evolution of the English language.

Kempt

Kempt comes from the Old English word kemb, “comb.” It seems to have gone out of use about 1600 but to have been reintroduced about 1860. The form unkempt began to be used about 1580 to mean “language that was inelegant or unrefined.” Incidentally, the root form of kemb seems to come from a Germanic form which meant “tooth,” so a comb is named for its teeth; the modern form uncombed appeared about 1560.

Ruly

Ruly, is an adjective formed about 1400 from rule (as in rule of law), to mean “law-abiding; disciplined; orderly.” Someone unruly was ungovernable or disorderly; the modern sense is a weakening of this.

Gainly

Someone ungainly is now “awkward, clumsy, ungraceful,” a sense which developed about 1600; its opposite gainly, never very common, was formed sometime after 1300 from the adjective gain, meaning “straight; near.” This was used especially in the phrase the gainest way, meaning the shortest, most direct route, but it quickly took on a figurative sense when applied to people of “well-disposed; kindly”, and of “useful; convenient” for objects; the root form is also the source of our words again and against.

Wieldy

Unwieldy comes from an Old English verb wield, derived from the same Indo-European source meaning “to be strong” as the Latin word from which we get valient. It variously meant “rule; govern; command; possess” and “to control; manage; deal with successfully”. Its adjective wieldy was derived from this latter sense and applied to persons, not things, in the sense “capable of wielding one’s body or weapon; active, agile, nimble.”

Couth

The word couth was once common. It was a form of the Old English word cunnan, “well-known; familiar” (related to the modern German kennen). So uncouth meant “unknown; unfamiliar.” The positive form couth went out of use in the 16th century except in Scotland. It was re-introduced in 1896 by Max Beerbohm as a deliberate and humorous back-formation from uncouth but has never really become established again in mainstream English.

Abled

Disabled was formed in the 16th century from the verb disable, but the corresponding adjective abled seems not to have been used at that time. It was created by back-formation in the US in the early eighties by disabled people to refer to those not so affected and which became part of euphemistic phrases like differently abled.

Words Seldom Used

Many other words have unpaired words, formed by removing the negating prefix, but are also uncommon. They include disarray, immaculate, inadvertent, inevitable, innocent, inscrutable, unflappable, and unrequited.

I think its interesting that innocent traces its history to the present participle of nocere "to harm," from nok-s-, suffixed form of PIE root nek- (1) "death." Nocent has become a rare adjective meaning “harmful; injurious” as in “nocent chemical waste and other toxins.”

And, by the way, the English maculate means marked with spots : blotched.

Legendary comedian Jack Winter begins his very short New Yorker story “How I Met My Wife” this way:

It had been a rough day, so when I walked into the party I was very chalant, despite my efforts to appear gruntled and consolate. I was furling my wieldy umbrella for the coat check when I saw her standing alone in a corner. She was a descript person, a woman in a state of total array. Her hair was kempt, her clothing shevelled, and she moved in a gainly way. I wanted desperately to meet her, but I knew I’d have to make bones about it, since I was travelling cognito.”

Comedian George Carlin is known for his way with words. Carlin once asked, “If lawyers are disbarred and clergymen defrocked, doesn’t it follow that electricians can be delighted, musicians denoted?”

George Carlin has a hilarious bit on words changing in a changed world in which he describes the sterilization of the American language. Click here to take a listen. Please enjoy but if an expletive or two offends you, opt out. From the 1990 special Doin' it Again ... 

 



Freedom Train Comes To Portsmouth -- 1948 History

 

The Freedom Train was coming to Portsmouth! It was making a stop at the Norfolk & Western Railroad Station. The red, white, and blue train symbolized the hopes of a nation concerned about the direction American life was taking in the wake of World War II.

After Americans had experienced a decade of pre-war economic Depression and made tremendous sacrifices in foreign lands throughout World War II, they were entering an age of post-war prosperity with opportunities unknown in all of human history. And they were unsure of the reassurances at the sudden dawn of the nuclear age and Soviet expansion into countries just liberated from fascist oppression in Europe and Asia. The train would enable Americans to rediscover for themselves just how hard-won their freedoms were.

The August 5, 1948, Portsmouth Times published a front page article with a headline proclaiming “Throngs To See Freedom Train Friday.” The city was abuzz. And for good reason: a ceremony to open the event would feature Governor Thomas J. Herbert speaking from a special platform at side of train; the 34-piece 158th Army Band from Ft. Knox would be there to entertain and “look snappy in their khaki uniforms with green helmets and leggings”; and the one-of-a-kind, incredible historical exhibit on the train would be open to the general public from 10 A.M. To 10 P.M.

The newspaper anticipated the crowd to visit the train would swell to 20,000. Paul Flohr of the Junior Chamber of Commerce cautioned: “Come early. We don't want to turn anybody away. Onboard one-way traffic, in single file would be the order of the day.

The glorious day arrived. On August 6, 1948, the beautiful, much-anticipated Freedom Train arrived in Portsmouth, Ohio, and the huge celebration commenced.

Mayor Wear spoke briefly to welcome the train to Portsmouth Then he and his wife and three sons – Larry, Scotty, and Tommy – led a party through the train for a preliminary inspection escorted by Walter H.S. O'Brien, the train director.

All manner of public servants were in place to assist. Along the train corridor, Marines in full dress uniform stood guard over the priceless documents while outside city police, naval reservists, and civil air patrolmen helped to keep the waiting line in order and direct traffic around the station.

Chief Hughy Rudity had as many police and traffic patrolmen as he could spare on duty at the depot, and Fire Chief Howard Keibler was on hand with a squad of firemen, ready to offer first aid in case of any mishap. 

 

Rush Hour Portsmouth Ohio 1948 is a painting by Frank Hunter

First in line when the train was opened to public view at 10 A.M. was a party of students and teachers from Rio Grande College. In a steady stream, other spectators followed. The day went along swimmingly without reported incident. The crowds were so big that Martings decided to close at 5 P.M. in order that employees might get to the train before the expected after-supper rush of visitors.

(Anna Linck. “Thousands Visit Freedom Train To View Historical Documents.” Portsmouth Times. August 6, 1948.)


The Freedom Train

With President Harry Truman in the lead, some in the national government believed Americans should pause and reflect, to experience a "rededication" to the principles that founded their country. And, since Truman loved trains (His use of the "whistle stop" campaign train still epitomizes this icon of the electoral process.), Attorney General Tom C. Clark and his staff proposed a train that would travel to communities in every state of the nation, taking with it dozens of "documents of liberty."

Clark proposed the Freedom Train in April 1946, and the idea was adopted by a coalition that included Paramount Pictures and the Advertising Council, which had just changed its name from "War Advertising Council.”

The Freedom Train became a seven-car train that traveled across the United States from September 1947 until January 1949. It was dedicated to the history of American democracy and contained some of the country's most priceless historical documents.

Once onboard at one of many stops, spectators could view important key documents supplied by the National Archives. Originally, Clark had planned for the train to be funded by Congress; however, he was unable to secure appropriated funds for the project. The American Heritage foundation was then created to lead the project. Funding was collected through private donations, corporations, and individuals. Archivist Elizabeth Hamer noted in August 1947, "Hollywood, chiefly, is putting up the capital for this exhibit."

Author Stuart J. Little says, "The National Archives' staff originally compiled documents and produced a wide-ranging and intriguing collection. The staff recommended documents covering women's suffrage, collective bargaining, Franklin D. Roosevelt's Executive Order 8802 concerning prohibition of discrimination in the defense industry,

and the National Labor Relations Act. The Foundation was unhappy with the list because they said it “detracts from our objectives.”

In April 1947 the Foundation rejected the Archives' list and gained control of document selection with the creation of the Documents Approval Committee. Contrary to the wishes of the Justice Department, the Foundation excluded collective bargaining from the list of citizens' rights.

In the final roster, the only document pertaining to black history was the Emancipation Proclamation – and even in this case, accompanying commentary focused on the white president Abraham Lincoln who issued the document.

(Stuart J. Little. The Freedom Train: Citizenship and Postwar Political Culture 1946-1949. 1993.)


Historical Note:

The Train displayed exhibits such as "Good Citizen,” which portrayed men wearing suits Exhibits also defined American freedoms in terms of consumerism and boasted of superior commodity production. For women (more often referred to as "girls" or "sisters"), good citizenship was defined in terms of clothing, participation in certain acceptable community activities, and raising children.

Despite the lack of certain “controversial” inclusions, the final selection was impressive – a hundred and twenty-one documents ranged from the Magna Carta to the flag that flew over the U.S.S. Missouri on the day the Japanese surrendered, only two years earlier. In between, there was a heavy emphasis on the Founding Fathers, including Jefferson’s draft of the Declaration of Independence, and Washington’s handwritten notes on the Constitution. Robert E. Lee was included, in a letter accepting his university presidency, which serenely occupied a panel with his adversary, Abraham Lincoln, who had three documents in all, including the Gettysburg Address and the aforementioned Emancipation Proclamation.

The Advertising Council planned an assortment of other events to accompany the train, including messages in radio programs, comic books, and films. In each city where the train stopped, they organized a "Rededication Week" for public celebrations of the United States.

American Federation of Labor President William Green and Congress of Industrial Organizations President Philip Murray were vice presidents of the Foundation. The Board of Trustees did not include any African-Americans until after the train had launched.

Thomas D'Arcy Brophy (of advertising firm Kenyon & Eckhardt) described the Freedom Train as "a campaign to sell America to Americans.”

American historian, writer, and librarian, Edward "Ted" Ladd Widmer writes in The New Yorker

At first blush, these exhibit planners were not natural revolutionaries. They chose the word 'Freedom' because 'Democracy' struck several as too volatile. The foundation’s most prominent Democrat, John W. Davis, had run for President, in 1924, on a segregationist platform. Without a very clear plan, the organizers hoped that the publicity stunt – seven train cars pulled by a two-thousand-horsepower locomotive with the number 1776 on the side – would result in a national 'rededication,' purging 'cynicism' and 'confusion.'”

(Ted Widmer. “Remembering the Freedom Train.” The New Yorker. November 26, 2017.)

To kick off the activities of the foundation and to make the nation aware of the forthcoming Freedom Train tour and program, a White House Conference was held on May 22, 1947. At the conference, Walter Francis White, executive secretary of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), as well as a trustee of the American Heritage Foundation, raised concerns about the contradictions between some of the documents the train would carry and the practice of segregation.

Walter White told the conferees that “merely causing people to look at and to touch the Bill of Rights and Declaration of Independence is not enough…We have got to plant it so deep in the hearts of all Americans that we can demonstrate to ourselves and to the world that democracy is the best way of life, but we have got to live it as well as talk about it.”

Dr. Greg Bradsher, Senior Archivist at the National Archives at College Park, writes …

Responding to White’s concerns, Charles E Wilson, president of the General Electric Corporation and the chairman of the President’s Committee on Civil Rights was most insistent about the foundation taking a stand on the segregation issue.

As a member of its board of trustees, at a July 9, 1947 executive committee meeting, he urged that the foundation make a statement about the segregation the Freedom Train would be greeted by in the South.

Although the committee decided not to make a public announcement about segregation until the tour was underway, it agreed unanimously 'that no segregation of any individual or groups of any kind on the basis of race or religion be allowed at the exhibition of the Freedom Train held anywhere.'”

(Dr. Greg Bradsher. “The Freedom Train and the Contagion of Liberty, 1947-1949.” National Archives. September 19, 2017.)

The project picked up speed. By the fall of 1947, Americans were awash in Freedom Train-themed comic books, school kits, and other materials heralding the approach of the exhibit. The American Heritage Foundation unveiled a new slogan, “Freedom is Everybody’s Job,” and Irving Berlin wrote a catchy song, which débuted in a carefully coördinated media blitz, just before departure. 

Historical Note:

As the starting date for the tour got closer criticism of the project increased.  Many Americans believed that the Freedom Train was simply a product of “Wall Street imperialism,” while others believed the tour was being undertaken on behalf of the Democratic Party. This train would be the first organized effort in what would later birth the Crusade for Freedom (an American propaganda campaign from the 50s and 60s, which sought to generate domestic support for American Cold War policies).

At each stop the Freedom Train was attended by large audiences eager to view its precious cargo, to take the Freedom Train Pledge, and to sign the Freedom Scroll.

The Train Leaves Philadelphia

All the radio networks of the day covered the train when it left Philadelphia, on September 17, 1947 – the hundred and sixtieth anniversary of the signing of the U.S. Constitution – on its way to its first stop, Atlantic City. None of the train’s personnel were black further supporting the idea that the Freedom Train was “somewhat of a contradiction” in a nation that segregated many of its transportation corridors.

On the week of the train’s departure, Langston Hughes published a new poem, “Freedom Train,” in The New Republic, in which the poet hinted at future trouble:

The Birmingham station's marked COLORED and WHITE.

The white folks go left, the colored go right--

They even got a segregated lane.

Is that the way to get aboard the Freedom Train?

 

I got to know about this

Freedom Train!

 

If my children ask me, Daddy, please explain

Why there's Jim Crow stations for the Freedom Train?

What shall I tell my children?...You tell me--'

Cause freedom ain't freedom when a man ain't free.


But maybe they explains it on the

Freedom Train.

(Langston Hughes. “Freedom Train.” 1947.)


In New England and New York, people stood in line for hours, whisked through the train at a rate of ten thousand a day.

Then it prepared for its push into the old Confederacy. As the train began heading south many African American leaders expressed their concern about the possibility of segregated viewing of the documents.

Bradsher reports …

Its first stop was Charlottesville, Virginia, where the return of Jefferson’s documents was treated as something of a family reunion. Deeper into the South, the project’s contradictions became more difficult to manage. As Langston Hughes had suspected, many Southern officials had no intention of letting white and black Americans walk through the narrow corridors of the train together.”

(Dr. Greg Bradsher. “The Freedom Train and the Contagion of Liberty, 1947-1949.” National Archives. September 19, 2017.)

Bradsher explains …

Harry Truman was a proud son of the Confederacy, keenly aware of his own family’s partisanship in the Civil War. But he had grown in the office, and the rising tide of violence against African-Americans had sickened him.

On October 29, 1947, his Administration had issued “To Secure These Rights,” a report that cited the same historic documents that the train was carrying, to argue that the United States had defaulted on its promise to African-Americans. The fusillade received a mixed response in the South, where leaders awaited the Freedom Train with mounting dread …

In Birmingham, the commissioner of public safety, Theophilus Eugene (Bull) Connor, was already known for his unreconstructed views. Memphis was also a problem, dominated by an old political machine led by E. H. (Boss) Crump and a mayor, James Pleasants, who argued that 'jostling' in the line was a form of unhealthy contact between the races. A Memphis newspaper summed up the situation with a headline that no satirist could have improved upon: 'Memphis Officials Fear Freedom Train Will Inspire Citizens.'”

(Dr. Greg Bradsher. “The Freedom Train and the Contagion of Liberty, 1947-1949.” National Archives. September 19, 2017.)

Faced with all the controversy, the Heritage Foundation announced that the train would bypass Birmingham and Memphis. In Birmingham, the cancellation was received with resignation, but in Memphis the news hit hard. Many Memphians chartered buses of their own to Nashville, where the train was cheerfully welcomed.

(Laurie B. Green. Battling the Plantation Mentality. 2007.)

Reaction to the cancellation was immediate. Walter White, learning of the cancellation, telegrammed the foundation that “the decision to withdraw [the] Freedom Train from Birmingham and thus put [the] Bill of Rights above local segregation laws, is the greatest Christmas gift to the cause of Democracy which can be given.”


 



In a syndicated column, White wrote that the decision of the Foundation not to be “cajoled or blackjacked” had done more “to make sharp and clear the issue of bigotry versus democracy than any other episode of recent years. If the Freedom Train has accomplished nothing more than that, it has been worth all the time and money put into its creation.”

This opinion was supported by The New York Times and state officials like executive assistant to the Attorney General, H. Graham Morrison.

Similar thoughts to those above were echoed in Birmingham and in the South. An editorial in The Birmingham Age-Herald on December 26, stated that the important things would be learned from the cancellation and observed that “obviously it is a time for all citizens to make special efforts towards understanding collaboration in the common interest.” It was joined in these views by an editorial in The Birmingham World on December 30. A January 2, 1948, editorial in the same newspaper expressed the hope the Freedom train would be given another tour and that when it did, “Birmingham shamed by the example of other Alabama and Southern cities, ought to be in the forefront on asking that they be displayed here.”

(Dr. Greg Bradsher. “The Freedom Train and the Contagion of Liberty, 1947-1949.” National Archives. September 19, 2017.)

Public critique of the Train continued during the tour. The Sunday Oregonian published a two-page section titled "No Premium Fares on Freedom Train – But Actually Some Citizens Still Ride Second Class,” detailing persistent discrimination and violence against Black Americans. These and other rumblings were described by FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover as "Negro Communist" agitation.

(Stuart J. Little. The Freedom Train: Citizenship and Postwar Political Culture 1946-1949. 1993.)

 

The Freedom Train visited forty-seven southern cities without any segregation problems, and according to one foundation executive, in no instance was there a “single incident to mar the decorum, dignity and patriotic spirit of the crowds.” This in itself, Louis Novins believed, represented a constructive achievement and established precedent throughout the South, which was all the more impressive, considering “almost all of these cities have segregation laws covering public gatherings.”

The Freedom Train's 37,160 mile tour lasted from September 17, 1947 to January 22, 1949. It was the only train set ever to operate in every state, and it did so using 52 different railroads. Over 3 million people (officially, 3,521,841) went aboard the Train during its display stops in 326 cities and towns across the land.

Historical Note:

As the Freedom Train rolled, Harry Truman campaigned joyfully during his whistle-stop campaign, as if he had found a freedom train of his own. In 1948, his victory was in part due to the ballots of African-Americans, voting in the Democratic column for the first time. On January 20, 1949, the week that Truman was inaugurated, the Freedom Train pulled back into Washington, D.C., the final stop on a thirty-seven-thousand-mile journey through all forty-eight states. A “Freedom Scroll,” containing the signatures of three million Americans who had boarded the train, was presented to the President, who had agreed to dispatch the train two years earlier, when there was no guarantee that he would be in Washington to welcome it back.

Freedom Train (1947)

By Langston Hughes

                        I read in the papers about the
                               Freedom Train.
                        I heard on the radio about the 
                               Freedom Train. 
                        I seen folks talkin' about the 
                               Freedom Train. 
                        Lord, I been a-waitin' for the 
                               Freedom Train!
Down South in Dixie only train I see's
Got a Jim Crow car set aside for me.
I hope there ain't no Jim Crow on the Freedom Train,
No back door entrance to the Freedom Train,
No signs FOR COLORED on the Freedom Train,
No WHITE FOLKS ONLY on the Freedom Train.

                         I'm gonna check up on this                                
                                Freedom Train.

Who's the engineer on the Freedom Train?
Can a coal black man drive the Freedom Train?
Or am I still a porter on the Freedom Train?
Is there ballot boxes on the Freedom Train?
When it stops in Mississippi wil it be made plain
Everybody's got a right to board the Freedom Train?

                          Somebody tell me about this
                                 Freedom Train!

The Birmingham station's marked COLORED and WHITE.
The white folks go left, the colored go right--
They even got a segregated lane.
Is that the way to get aboard the Freedom Train?

                            I got to know about this
                                  Freedom Train!

If my children ask me, Daddy, please explain
Why there's Jim Crow stations for the Freedom Train?
What shall I tell my children?...You tell me--'
Cause freedom ain't freedom when a man ain't free.

                            But maybe they explains it on the
                                  Freedom Train.

When my grandmother in Atlanta, 83 and black,
Gets in line to see the Freedom,
Will some white man yell, Get back!
A Negro's got no business on the Freedom Track!

                            Mister, I thought it were the
                                  Freedom Train!

Her grandson's name was Jimmy. He died at Anzio.
He died for real. It warn't no show.
The freedom what they carryin' on this Freedom Train,
Is it for real--or just a show again?

                             Jimmy wants to know about the
                                  Freedom Train.

Will his Freedom Train come zoomin' down the track
Gleamin' in the sunlight for white and black?
Not stoppin' at no stations marked COLORED nor WHITE.
Just stoppin' in the fields in the broad daylight,
Stoppin' in the country in the wide-open air
Where there never was no Jim Crow signs nowhere,
No Welcomin' Committees, nor Politicians of note,
No Mayors and such for which colored can't vote,
And nary a sign of a color line--
For the Freedom Train will be yours and mine!
Then maybe from their graves in Anzio
The G.I.'s who fought will say, We wanted it so!
Black men and white will say, Ain't it fine?
At home they got a train that's yours and mine!

                              Then I'll shout, Glory for the
                                   Freedom Train!
                              I'll holler, Blow your whistle,
                                   Freedom Train!
                              Thank God-A-Mighty! Here's the
                                   Freedom Train!
                              Get on board our Freedom Train!