Friday, May 10, 2019

200 Years of Lucasville -- What Does It Mean?





“The Lucasville Area Historical Society has been a critical fixture in the town of Lucasville, Ohio, serving to bridge the gap between local history and personal
and familial significance. It aims to be a central hub for historical records from
the area, and its large collections, mostly gleaned from personal donations, demonstrate the penchant for the preservation and exhibition of history
within the community.”

– Center for Folklore Studies, The Ohio State University

The Bicentennial Celebration of Lucasville, Ohio, is upon us. Without the Lucasville Area Historical Society, the small community of Lucasville may have allowed this commemoration to slip by with scant observance. A modest number of people in this service organization rose to the occasion to insure that the birthday of the village received its due regard. That commission was not taken lightly, especially reviewing the outstanding sesquicentennial collaboration of fifty years before.

The work being done by club members is monumental to say the least. Early on, the historical society assumed the challenging assignment of planning the 2019 celebration and organizing multiple events during the year. Although the task often seemed overwhelming, caring people volunteered to create an astonishing schedule of meaningful bicentennial engagements – all of which pay homage to an exceptional small town.

This labor of love serves to build community and preserve the heritage of a most significant Southern Ohio hamlet. As people, young and old, add their ideas and energies to the bicentennial celebration, the diverse threads weave a stronger fabric of commonality. The old adage of “It takes a village” transcends its banality when people experience the real dependency of community. This reliance surely mirrors that of the Founding Families of 1819.

It is hoped that many will observe the Lucasville Bicentennial. So much thought and work have gone into making the birthday a memorable time. And, it is surely presumptuous of the historical society to expect throngs to attend all the events. But, I understand that multitudes matter less than enthusiasm, and I am convinced that the Lucasville Historical Society has grown immeasurably due to meeting the pressures, expectations, and deadlines of commemorating 200 years of Lucasville existence.

Therein is great progress. Without a doubt, the Lucasville area is being revitalized by the celebration. Turning this page of history, people are both honoring tradition and revealing new, exciting developments that serve as the lifeblood of the community. We continue to discover ourselves in the process.

"There is no power for change greater than a community
discovering what it cares about."

– Margaret J. Wheatley

The relatively small group of people who dedicated themselves to this mission have grown together mightily as an organization because each individual continues to flex considerable muscle through his or her strong talents and timely industry. Through pushing the limits of their engagement, the club has met the challenge and continues to grow.

“Coming together is a beginning; keeping together is progress;
working together is success.”

– Edward Everett Hale, American author and historian




Sunday, May 5, 2019

Work -- Young and Old Together Build Lasting Communities





“I know of no single formula for success. But over the years I have observed that some attributes of leadership are universal and are often about finding ways of encouraging people to combine their efforts, their talents, their insights, their enthusiasm and their inspiration to work together.”

– Queen Elizabeth II

Nothing … NOTHING brings hearts and souls in unison like working together. Working together builds trust, teaches conflict resolution, promotes risk-taking, and creates a wider sense of ownership. From my years of teaching and working with other groups like the Youth Conservation Corp, I have witnessed unbelievable achievements as all ages plan and execute work projects. As individuals with complimentary strengths find common ground in labor, the results are often miraculous.

No one has to remind older folks of the tremendous vitality and creativity of youth. We of not-so-tender-years reminisce of our own past when energy and muscle reliably fueled our endeavors. Most projects require both mature understanding and youthful enthusiasm. When adults and young people combine their resources, team spirit grows, and all involved gain valuable new perspectives. The strong interaction, built on community spirit, acknowledges this reciprocal advantage.

Quite simply, work becomes more enjoyable as an honest, shared work ethic forms. It becomes a living, breathing sense of integrity in a vibrant community. The inevitable result is a reliance on a dependable, fair division of labor. Project sharing across age groups bridges generation gaps and encourages initiative. It emphasizes the strength in diversity as different personality types find common ground in their industry.

I would like to express a notion we hear frequently that I am sure has been alleged, in some fashionable form or other, by every generation of adults since the first apple grew in the Garden. It goes like this …

“These damned teenagers are so lazy these days. The know-it-alls are just a bunch of phone-addicted, selfie-obsessed, hashtagging, snapchatting, kale-munching, whining babies.”

Talk about a stereotype that would lower the self esteem of Horatio Alger. No self-respecting adolescent wants to bear the weight of being a spoiled sluggard who expects something for nothing and who lives off the labors of others. These youth, more than likely, are in the process of becoming more educated than their parents, and they just don't want to screw up. We encourage to engage with caution in nearly every endeavor. We warn them that no one owes them a living or a happy life. Is it any wonder they take their time and question a society in which they must dodge pitfalls at every step?

In truth, most young people commonly considered “slackers” are hard workers looking for more efficient ways of doing things. They crave respect, and many of them have taken over the responsibility of caring for younger siblings. Growing up in a either a single-parent or both-parents-working environment. These adolescents were raised as mini adults. It’s no longer Mr. Rogers’ neighborhood. In fact, it's pretty scary out there now.

Older people claim youth have very poor social skills, and perhaps they do if old standards apply. But, communication and teamwork to young people now involve learning from the collaborative nature of their unique childhood activities, which include social networks, crowd-sourcing, and even video gaming. To youth, so much social communication involves technology and speed of connection.

Technology speeds up the communication between people, and it provides convenience to use more than one method of communication. Now, a conversationist can use email, social media, chat messengers, video conferencing, video calls, images, videos, symbols, diagrams, charts and emoticons etc. for the communication – all technology available to busy fingertips 24/7.

Is it any wonder speaking skills falter when face-to-face communication is now so outdated? One can understand how a reliance on digital devices makes things such as reading non-verbal clues obsolete in a filtered, device-driven environment. Technological advances have made verbal communication redundant in many parts of life – now you can take a college class, shop for groceries, or interact with a personal trainer online. One must really question how face-to-face communication will weather the changes afforded by technology.

Are young people really less social than their parents and grandparents? Or, are they practicing a new manner of social contact more suited to the world in which they live? A Common Sense Media census report released in 2016 found half of kids in the U.S. have some form of social media by age 12. Trends are so important to children who face so much pressure to be popular and readily accepted.

Although many parents worry about their children's abilities to analyze the truth and maintain privacy at that age, many are now setting strict boundaries and monitoring activities as their kids use these sites. After all, no guardian wants to impose isolation at any age.

MIT Technology Review recently hosted a review by Manuel Castells, Chair Professor of Communication Technology and Society at the University of Southern California, who offered his
in-depth analysis titled “The Impact of the Internet on Society: A Global Perspective.” In this presentation, Castells said ...

“The media often reports that intense use of the Internet increases the risk of isolation, alienation, and withdrawal from society, but available evidence shows that the Internet neither isolates people nor reduces their sociability; it actually increases sociability, civic engagement, and the intensity of family and friendship relationships, in all cultures.”

I certainly know one thing about modern communication. When an old codger like me seeks help and understanding about computers, cell phones, and other electronic devices, we run to the younger generation for their technological expertise. We – the young and old – need each other. And, we must construct better avenues of working together to achieve the results we desire.

Without a doubt, the need to work together exists. Sharing labor offers great benefits to all ages, cultures, and personality types. Such engagement strengthens group and personal skills. It is vital for community growth and inclusion. The lifeblood of any group depends on the service of its members. I believe the failure to encourage employment of all ages stifles growth and threatens important objectives.

According to a study done by Search Institute (2014), 25 percent of youth feel that their community's adults value them, and 28 percent of youth feel that they have useful roles in their community. This is alarmingly low. Youth-adult partnerships can foster success by allowing young people to share in the decision-making power in communities; these partnerships allow youth to assume important roles as active citizens.

In addition, youth-adult partnerships dispel negative stereotypes about the perceptions and capabilities of teenagers. Working together to accomplish meaningful tasks, teenagers and adults become aware of each others acute perception and immense capabilities. This reliance builds mutual trust.

How, then, can adults and youth best employ their common energy, passion, and commitment? Adults must readily partner with youth and work together with these young people in projects that build community. The labor can be initiated with activities as basic as voicing opinions or sharing simple physical tasks. It strengthens as common they identify needs and explore basic ideas to achieve goals.

I strongly believe young people should be personally invited to become members of community organizations. Few will join without encouragement because many feel they have nothing to offer, they won't know anybody, or they think it will not be much fun. And, here is the focus of my essay – working together generates happiness and approval. Yes, working in a group is rewarding and enjoyable.

Work in community organizations may seem like obligation and service to adults, but most young people are standing at the beginning of a long, difficult journey without the experience to understand the value of giving back to their community. Likely school and church comprise their frame of reference for such interaction at this tender age. Youth need to join broader efforts to further effect their own environment.

The work young people do for their community teaches them that helping others makes them feel good about themselves … and more … it simply teaches them to trust the power of hard work. That's a lesson we know sets a person on the road to success.

I believe young people want to be fully engaged. They want to learn. Good learning involves direct experience. And, it follows that work is the foundation of practical involvement. Learning is often most effective when it is social; when it occurs as a shared activity within meaningful relationships; and when it allows for increasingly responsible participation—within a tradition, or a community of fellow learners, or one’s culture at large.

Therefore, I encourage the Lucasville Area Historical Society to invite young people to join the club in its meaningful endeavors. The talented youth in the area represent a great resource, one that is largely untapped. I believe people must be taught to “see themselves” in roles of leadership and service in the group. But, beyond that, they must also be shown that “seeing themselves outside of themselves” leads to true fulfillment.

As young and old work together, the service truly becomes communal. I hope many youth consider joining the organization. I think the Historical Society should formally invite these children to participate in all activities. I know such participation would benefit all involved.



Footnote: A Lesson About Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs 

When you just take from the world you live in and choose not to contribute to it, it keeps you in a state of surviving no matter how much you have or how much money you make. Jumping from survival to success is a mistake and will land you back in survival. However, when you contribute beyond yourself at each stage of progression, you are consuming and contributing which creates balance.

Contribution doesn’t happen at the top of the pyramid, it occurs throughout every stage. If you make it only about yourself, you won’t stay in success or significance and feel fulfilled. Success does not always mean making lots of money alone so keep that in mind. Success includes having all aspects of your life working together. Job, family, faith, and your place in your community.




Wednesday, May 1, 2019

Lucasville Community Institute -- No, Not the Prison



Do you remember the days when people congregated to talk, laugh, and learn together? If you are an old codger like me, you must be missing such opportunities more and more in this fast-paced, digital society. I'm not talking about conversations and memes on Facebook, Twitter, and other forms of distant social media. I'm reminiscing about getting together face-to-face with other community members and sharing all sorts of information … I'm speaking about actually participating in meaningful learning activities.

Long-time Lucasville resident Hilda Pfleger Miller has completed research on a group from Lucasville that played an important role in the community of the 1940s and 1950s. Thanks to her diligent investigation of a group of which she was once a member, I can write with insight about an organization that successfully drew together many elements of Lucasville community.

In Lucasville that organization was known by most as “The Institute.” There were several official names for the group – Lucasville Community Institute, Lucasville Farmers Community Institute, and the Farmers Institute. The annual institutes were an outreach of the Scioto County Agricultural Extension Office in connection with other local civic groups throughout the county.

Among the organizations that sponsored the Institute included the Garden Club, the Farm Bureau, councils, the Civic Service Club, Grange, the Valley Local Schools, and the Scioto County Agricultural Extension Office.

Hilda found many newspaper articles about the Institute and its activities from 1946 to 1953 in the Portsmouth Times archives. She laments that the coming of the A-Plant was announced in August 1952 and Lucasville seemingly “went in a new direction.”

The Lucasville Institute evolved into a two-day session. The first evening included speakers on topics such as agriculture and soil conservation. For example, these programs were presented to the community by the Institute during its heyday ...

* Dr. M. T. Meyers of Hillsboro spoke about the development of hybrid seed corn.
* Mrs. J. H. Frowine addressed the group on the topic of 4-H Club activities.
* Boss Johnston, featured speaker on WLW radio's “Everybody's Farm Hour,” offered agricultural advice.
* Judge Dermison of London, Ohio, even presented a “Corn Show.”
* Demonstrations of rug making and other crafts.

There was also group singing and music by the Valley Band and Glee Club at the gatherings. “The 50-piece Valley High School Band” under the direction of Ralph French presented concerts. And other groups entertained such as the Senior Girls' Sextet that sang popular songs such as “Shine on Harvest Moon” under the direction of Miss Betty Pollock.

The Institute also highlighted student academic talent such as an oration from Peggy Adams, Prince of Peace declamation winner.

The second night featured a talent program – Hilda says “not a talent contest, but a program open to anyone who wanted to take part.”

And, Hilda Pfleger Miller remembers participating in one of the talent shows. Corine Blankenship and Hilda sang verses from the “Ballad of the Boll Weevil” they had sung in their music classes at school. She recalls: “Obviously it was an early institute; we would never have done this as teenagers!”

“The first time I seen a boll weevil
He was sitting on the square
The next time I seen a boll weevil
He had his whole family there
They are looking for a home
They were looking for a home”

Another talent show act was presented by Hilda's mother, Glady Pfleger, who gave a very long recitation featuring many hats as props. The skit was about a lady trying on hats in a shop and finally walking out without making a purchase. Hilda says she still has a copy of her mother's recitation.

The Institute was a very popular foundation. A Lucasville Community Institute in 1953 in the Valley High Auditorium with Charles Bradshaw, president (succeeding Grant Malone); Elza Stambaugh, vice-president and hostess; and Raymond Zaler, secretary-treasurer boosted an attendance of 450 people.

Other presidents during the time of the Institute included locals Mont Preston, Charles Zaler, Lee Butler, and Edward L. Miller.

Reports and presentations by Lucasville organizations added further community cohesion during the institute sessions. For example, in 1952, these people addressed the assembly about a variety of community affairs …

* Miss Enid C. Swerner, home demonstration agent;
* J. W. McKinley, Lucasville Civic Club representative;
* Dr. A. A. Melior, “new” physician;
* P. L. Bogan, Valley Township Fire Chief;
* Mrs. T. J. Cyrus, Lucasville PTA representative;
* Mrs. Dorother VanHoose, Lucasville Garden Club representative; and o
* Other people from the Scioto Valley Grange and Farm Bureau Council were on the program.

The Institute was further bolstered by adult Executive Committee members such as Lawrence Comer and Ralph French, Valley High; Mrs. Earl C. Moulton, home council; Mrs. Harry Wagner, youth and 4-H Clubs; Mrs. Charles Zaler, Mrs. James Peebles, and Lynn Sloan, farm organizations; and John Collis, Guy Bumgarner, and Mrs. Gaylord Preston, other businesses.

Of course, it is impossible to name all the contributors to the Institute some 60-70 years later. Newspaper accounts of the time give sparse detail. Perhaps readers can add to this initial investigation into the group. If you have further information, please submit it to the Lucasville Area Historical Society for safe keeping and public consumption.

Now, it seems to me such an effort to coordinate, centralize, and develop the Lucasville community is sorely lacking now. Oh, I know people are so busy these days, and everybody lacks time for such commitment. However, what a loss when the Lucasville Community Institute faded into the proverbial “sunset” and went “over the rainbow” in the mid-50s. Reading about the efforts of the members of this group makes me feel a void – the diversity of the Institute and its broad inclusion of interests formed lasting fellowship.

I want to thank Hilda Pfleger Miller for caring about her old community. She now lives in Dayton, Ohio. I find her concern about the Lucasville area of today stimulating. She benefited so much from her association with the people and organizations of the past that she longs to see continued efforts to fortify that strong social structure. To her, it matters greatly. And, I, for one, agree.




Tuesday, April 30, 2019

Ohio and Erie Canal -- A Living Monument





“But what of the future upon our canals?
How can we expect them to be?
Pollution and traffic upon all our roads
May yet be the obvious key
To launch a renaissance of waterways, old,
And those that are still to be made.
With bold inspiration and vision that’s sound
We soon could return them to trade.”

– From “Where the Working Boats Went” by Tony Haynes

What do you know about the Ohio and Erie Canal on the Westside of the Scioto River. Its just a stinky old, stagnant ruin of the past, right? It represents a lost dream of bygone days, doesn't it? But, wait just a minute. Researching this local waterway reveals another perspective … one of great industry and commercial growth. In truth, this channel was an Ohio conduit of imagination and opportunity. 

By 1820, 580,000 residents were estimated to be living in Ohio, and most of them were involved in agriculture. Despirt the growth in this early American frontier, Ohio was one of the poorest states in the Union. The problem with modern agriculture of the day was that farmers had more produce than they could use and no way to move it beyond their local communities. Moving the excess produce beyond the local markets, and into the cities required some means of transport that was at least a little bit more reliable and that wouldn't eat up all the profits.

Before the arrival of the first canal, the only way farmers, manufacturers, and everyday travelers had for getting anywhere distant were poorly constructed roads that were often impassible during the winter and wet spring months. The much anticipated National Road had only reached Wheeling, West Virginia by 1817 and it would be another 16 years before it reached Columbus, Ohio.

For Ohioans in the early 1800s the logical solution seemed to be a canal system that would connect the two major bodies of water in Ohio: Lake Erie, that connected farmers with the east coast, with the Ohio River, that connected them with points South all the way to the Gulf of Mexico. Canal construction would be very expensive and somewhat slow moving; however, the dream of growth would spur the construction of a modern marvel.

When Ohio was a mere 21 years old, the legislature authorized funding for the Ohio and Erie Canal. The principal goals of the canal for the State of Ohio were to serve as many voters as possible and connect the Ohio River with Lake Erie as quickly and cheaply as possible without throwing the state into bankruptcy.

On February 4, 1825, the Ohio Legislature passed "An Act to provide for the Internal Improvement of the State of Ohio by Navigable Canals.” Construction of the Ohio and Erie Canal began in 1825. It would be a course that would stretch 308 miles between Cleveland and Portsmouth.

“For every mile of the canal, an Irishman is buried.”

– A popular expression associated with the Ohio and Erie Canal

Work on the canal was grueling and dangerous. Laborers used picks, shovels, and wheelbarrows to dig the watercourse. And, after the canal was dug, it also needed to be lined with clay to make it waterproof.

Laborers – mostly German and Irish immigrants – worked 12 hour days in return for thirty cents and a ration of whiskey. Malaria. dubbed “Canal Fever.” claimed the lives of hundreds of young men as they died from various microbes festering in the mud and stagnant water. There was a time when as many as six deaths were recorded on average for every mile dug. Many unfortunate souls were buried in shallow, unmarked graves along the canal, or in mass paupers graves at nearby cemeteries.

Construction of the hundreds of sandstone locks in the canal was tremendously difficult. The locks were constructed to bridge the 1,200-foot elevation difference between the lake and river. Each stone in a lock weighed between two and four tons and had to be set in place using a system of ropes and pulleys. Lock walls were five feet thick at the base and tapered to four feet at the top.

In many spots along its route, the canal had to cross other rivers and streams. At these locations, aqueducts carried the canal over the stream. Culverts, barrel-shaped channels, carried small streams under the canal. Turn-around and pull-off basins allowed boats to unload cargo, make repairs, stay the night, or simply turn around.

When completed in 1832, the Ohio and Erie Canal had cost $4,244,540. This averaged just less than $15,000 per mile. The finished canal consisted of 146 lift locks, 7 guard locks, 14 aqueducts, 203 culverts, and 14 dams. The waterway soon became a major catalyst for the state's economic growth.

Commerce on the canal soon flourished. Although the size of the locks – 90' long in the chamber and 15' wide, with a pair of wooden gates at either end – limited the size of wooden canal boats, business boomed.

The canal held four feet of water to support canal boats carrying many tons of cargo traveling at about three miles per hour. (A speed limit of 4 mph was enacted by the State of Ohio to protect the canal banks from erosion.) Everything from agricultural products to stone and lumber floated on the canal.

A canal boat crew was a colorful sight. The boats were usually manned by a team of three people: the captain, the bowsman or helmsmen (Who steered the boat from the bow using a very long wooden stick connected to the rudder called the tiller.), and the teamster or “hoggee” who walked behind the horses to keep them moving. Horses and mules walking along the towpath pulled the boats up and down the canal. By the way, President James A. Garfield was an Ohio hoggee when he was just 16 years old.

The boat captain – sometimes in a military-style jacket and stovepipe hat – usually owned the vessel and often lived aboard with his family. A 9x12-ft. cabin, located near the stern of the boat, served as the family’s home. Mothers and daughters often performed the domestic activities of the boat such as preparing meals or washing clothes in the canal, and young males often served as mule skinners. Parents often tied the youngest children to a post located in the center of the boat to prevent them from falling into the canal.

Canal passenger boats, also called “packet boats,” transported 40 to 60 passengers. In November 1834, President John Q. Adams wrote of the experience of “locking through” on the Ohio and Erie Canal:

“The most uncomfortable part of our navigation is caused by the careless and unskillful steering of the boat in and through the locks, which seemed to be numberless, upwards of 200 of them on the canal. The boat scarcely escapes a heavy thump on entering every one of them. She strikes and grazes against their sides, and staggers along like a stumbling nag.”

Here is another passenger’s objectionable description of a trip aboard a canal boat, which had a gentlemen’s cabin, a ladies’ cabin and dressing room, a barroom, and a kitchen:

“Into this space were stowed 35 men, 19 women and 10 children … During the day, the beds, consisting of mattresses, sheets, pillows and cotton quilts, were piled one above another … The smell of animal effluvia, when they were unpacked, was truly horrid ... they were saturated with the perspiration of every individual who had used them since the commencement of the season.”

(Excerpted from Ohio and Its People, George W. Knepper, Ohio: Kent State University Press, 1989, pg. 155. 2.)

Still, the difficulties Ohioans faced with the canals paled in comparison to the advantages that they garnered. Most importantly, the cost to ship goods from the East Coast to Ohio and vice versa declined tremendously from 125 dollars per ton of goods to twenty-five dollars per ton of goods. It took eighty hours to travel from Cleveland to Portsmouth along the Ohio and Erie Canal. While horseback was much quicker, it also cost a great deal more. The cost on the canal boat was $1.70 per person.

The canals enjoyed a period of grand prosperity from the 1830s to the early 1860s, with maximum revenue between 1852 and 1855. During the 1840s, Ohio was the third most prosperous state, owing much of that growth to the canal.

In the canal heyday, boat companies operated fleets of vessels, hiring captains and crew. Captains could have a high professional standing in the community. Solo owner-operators became the norm, and their social status slipped. Entire families began to live and work on boats.

Early boats had enclosed cabins and carried cargo packed in barrels and crates. Later, boats had open decks to carry more bulk goods. They also increased in tonnage, responding to their ability to compete with railroads to haul the bulkiest goods like lumber and coal.

Gov. William Seward of New York proclaimed “the highest attainable equality” would come with canals. Ohio canal commissioners believed “the moral and intellectual condition of a people” would improve. And, the canals surely did deliver ... at least for a time.

(Jennie Vasarhelyi. “Illustrating stories of Ohio & Erie Canal.” West Side Leader. May 15, 2014)

In addition to upgrading the equality of rural Ohio citizens, the Ohio and Erie Canal greatly changed the lives of those who were interacting through trade. People now had increased access to consumer goods, so they could buy rather than make many of the things they used. Manufactured goods had been pretty much unknown on the frontier until transportation costs became cheaper. These were the first inklings of emergence of the consumer economy.

The canal also stimulated local business growth along its route. It was wide enough for two-way traffic, but since locks could only handle one boat at a time, traffic was bound to back up, just as it does on modern freeways. People did not like having to sit around and wait to "lock through," so many stores and taverns began to develop near the canal.

Cities grew and even sprang up along the Ohio and Erie Canal. The canal almost instantly turned Cleveland into a major commercial center. The city became the hub of a continental transportation network that connected with New York City via Lake Erie and New York’s Erie Canal as well as with the nation’s developing frontier areas and New Orleans via the Ohio and Mississippi Rivers.

Simon Perkins realized the potential for business near the canal. So, in 1825, as construction of the canal was beginning, he founded the city of Akron. He knew that with 16 locks placed in close proximity there would be plenty of opportunity for development. Akron would evolve into one of the major cities in northeast Ohio.

The locks on the canal even spurred industrial development in the state. Each lock served as a water elevator, capable of raising and lowering boats heavily laden with cargo. Because of the elevation change, usually eight feet, areas near locks became a great source of waterpower for industry. Saw mills, grist mills, and woolen mills sprang up at locks and other areas of the canal where the water could power their machinery.

For decades, the Ohio & Erie Canal was the state’s principal mode of transportation not only for goods but also for people. By 1840 Ohio had grown from one of the poorest states in the Union to the third most prosperous. The growth and development spurred by the construction of the canal system is the foundation of Ohio's economy today.

It wasn’t until the 1870s, when railroads became the faster, cheaper way to move folks and freight, that the canal ultimately began its decline. By the early 20th century, much of it was abandoned altogether.

Ohio’s canals came to an abrupt halt in March of 1913. That spring had a severe snowmelt, flooding and destroying towpaths, locks, aqueducts, you-name-it. Since canal expenditures were already outpacing revenue, it was clear it was time to throw in the towel.

The Ohio and Erie Canal was then used as a water supply for local industries, some to this day. Many of the old locks and sections of the canal have been preserved as National Historic Landmarks. Other parts of the waterways are now tourist attractions or reserved for parks and recreational uses. In Ohio, they are usually run by the National Park Service or Ohio Department of Natural Resources.



Lucasville Canal History

The subject of canals had, for State Senator Robert Lucas, a local as well as a general interest. Considering the fact that the projected Ohio Canal was to run along the Scioto River through Pike County (his home) and connect the town of Portsmouth with Lake Erie, he was more than enthusiastic in its support.

Lucas thus became one of the most prominent advocates of general canal legislation and other policies of internal improvement in the State. He was Chairman of the Joint Canal Committee that prepared and drafted the bill authorizing the construction of the Ohio Canal, and for years he continued to hold this position on the committee.

It should be established that during that time the matter of canals and schools were positively and politically linked together. The passage of this law was due to the tactful and political management of the friends of eduction in the legislature, who united their forces with the friends of internal improvement. As a result, canals and public schools were provided for in Ohio by the same legislature. Robert Lucas surely understood how “scratching the opposition's back” could lead to compromise.

As published in the Ohio Educational Monthly, Volume 71 (circa 1923) ...

“The sight of an Ohio canal, even though abandoned because its days of usefulness are gone, should still arouse in the minds of all who love the public schools grateful memories of that day nearly one hundred years ago when the support of the friends of canals made possible the beginning of the public school system of Ohio.”

The monumental Ohio Education Bill of 1825 required that Townships be laid off into school districts; school officers be elected to manage the schools; teachers be certificated to teach by a county board of examiners; and most important and significant of all, a tax of one-half mill upon the property of the several counties of the State be levied to produce an annual fund for the instruction of youth.

The Ohio and Erie Canal may have led to a relatively short-lived era of physical conveyance; however, it helped establish fundamental opportunities that blossomed into vital realities. This vision and challenge of a watery link – a passage that spurred trade, transportation, and population – opened the hearts and minds of Buckeyes to realizing achievements that rest at the base of Ohio, Scioto County, and Lucasville. Indeed, education remains the greatest asset of the people.




Monday, April 15, 2019

Jackie and Branch -- Warriors United




“Wesley Branch Rickey was a moral man. He would have made an impressive fire-and-brimstone preacher, an effective politician, or a tough-to-beat lawyer, whether prosecuting or defending. But this man, like many of us, was fascinated by a boy's game – baseball.”

– Stan Musial

Today, April 15, 2019, Major League Baseball honors Jackie Robinson. It is the 72nd anniversary of his first game with the Brooklyn Dodgers in 1947. That day, Robinson changed the sport forever when he became the first African American to play Major League Baseball. And, that day in history represented much more – many believe it was the real beginning of the American Civil Rights movement.

The debut of Jackie Robinson was long before other events in the movement that occurred in Little Rock, Birmingham, Selma, and the Lincoln Memorial. Because of Jackie Robinson, Americans were forced to confront a world in which black and white men could work side by side for a common goal. The struggle had deep origins in American sports.

It must never be forgotten that Jackie Robinson was afforded this early opportunity by a fearless visionary named Wesley Branch Rickey. In his efforts to break the color barrier, Rickey was honoring two of the principles that guided his life: to provide equality for all and to speak out for what is right. Though his signing of Robinson was a business decision, its roots sprung from the need to right a wrong. The character of Branch Rickey was unquestioned.

Since the late 1880s, the owners of Major League baseball teams had operated under a deplorable “gentleman's agreement,” whereby they would not employ African American players. Rickey was determined to put an end to this policy. He explained …

“The very first thing I did when I came to Brooklyn in late 1942 was to investigate the approval of ownership for a Negro player. There was timeliness about the notion. The Negro in Americas was legally but never morally free. I thought: If the right man with control of himself could be found ...”

Jackie Robinson was that “right man.” He was not only a great player but also a model citizen. During his career, he endured harsh criticism from fans, other players, and even his own teammates. He was the target of bigoted insults, bean balls, and even death threats. Knowing that he carried the prospects of an entire race, though, Robinson endured it all without retaliating, and it literally “ate him alive.” He suffered from stomach pains. His hair turned gray prematurely. As the first season waned, however, the criticism diminished, and the praise grew.

You see, Branch Rickey believed that God had chosen Jackie Robinson for this noble purpose. He knew that if Jackie committed himself to doing this great thing, God would give him the strength he needed to see it through.

“Mr. Rickey, do you want a ballplayer who is afraid to fight back?” Robinson asked. “No,” came the reply. “I want a ballplayer with guts enough not to fight back.” Robinson relented; Rickey found his pioneer. The rest of the story reveals the amazing friendship and determination of the pair.

The Lucasville Roots of Rickey

The Rickeys were devoutly religious Methodists who adhered to the pious Wesleyan tradition of social liberalism. Self-discipline, education, and hard work were the predominant values in the rural Rickey home. It is very apparent that young Branch grew up in a family that believed in the principles of liberty and justice – ideals that that served him well when he boldly went against so many white, prejudiced colleagues in baseball. I wonder how many today in Lucasville even know the story. Its local roots deserve the honest declaration.

In 1892, the Rickey family moved to Lucasville,Ohio. The Rickeys moved into Squire Crain's house on Valley Pike across from Chandler Moulton's store. Here, they rented three rooms on each of two floors with separate entries on the front and rear.

Part of the reason for the move was that the family believed 11-year-old Branch Rickey was especially bright, and the one-room schoolhouse near Duck Run had given him all it could. At that time, the small village of Lucasville had a better school (two stories) with more than one overworked teacher and with a more complex curriculum. In addition, the school had a very resourceful superintendent, James H. Finney, a man who became one of Rickey's strongest influences and supporters.

Lucasville – with its school, its people, and its offer of broader opportunity – helped shape the foundation of Branch Rickey. The immeasurable positive effect of the local school system was paramount to his early development. In Lucasville, Branch overcame any reservations and blossomed as a scholar. This was also the place where he formed his enduring love for baseball while honing his athletic skills playing on local teams.

And speaking of affection? In addition, Branch met and married the love of his life, Jane Moulton Rickey, here in Lucasville. One biographer recalls the courtship and Branch saying: “I confessed my love for Jane and when she told me she loved me, I left the Moulton porch with eyes full of tears of joy.” Jane's steadfast love and positive influence were monumental in his life and career.

And, here in Lucasville, he formed many life-long friendships … so many that he knew Valley High as his “alma mater” and Lucasville as his “home town.” Many times he returned to the village to renew old ties and to relax with friends. Many relatives remain in the area to this day.

It is very important to understand that Branch Rickey, from the beginning, had a wide range of interests. As a young man, he became a rural school teacher, a lay preacher, and was once considered as a nominee for governor of Missouri. Of course, Rickey was also a tremendous athlete who played both baseball and football in college. Moreover, he was a man of tremendous intellect and immeasurable drive. He was fearsomely intelligent, well read, and thoughtful. He graduated law school at the University of Michigan and became head baseball coach while studying there.

“He talks with such pontifical oratory that he could and would make a reading of batting averages sound as impressive and as stirring as Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address,” said the New York Times’ Arthur Daley.

What about fate? The course of Branch Rickey's young life is indelibly etched in Lucasville history. In 1901, local school superintendents James Finney and Frank Appel, graduates of Ohio Wesleyan University, urged Branch to leave home and enter college in Delaware as a probationary student.

Thus, it was here in Lucasville that Branch Rickey committed his first exceedingly bold and rebellious act. His father told him, “I think you ought not go to college at this time.” But, Branch, with $62 in his pocket and the consent of his mother, flagged down the train at the Lucasville depot and chased his dream. “I wanted to go to college more than anything else in the world, and I didn't care how I got there,” he later said. What a payoff would follow … and soon … Rickey played on the OWU football and baseball teams in his freshman year.

“Lucasville Rick,” as Branch was affectionately known, went on to become an icon of baseball and a champion of civil rights, the man who rubbed out the deplorable color line in professional sports. He remains one of the most influential men in American history.

Red Smith, Pulitzer Prize winning sportswriter, once said “If his goal had been the United States Supreme Court instead of the Cincinnati Reds, he would have been a giant on the bench.”

Branch Rickey's contributions went far beyond the game. He was as much about the betterment of people and society as he was baseball. He changed everything from the way players were evaluated to the way individuals were: by the content of their character.

Jackie Robinson, at the time of Rickey's death in 1965, said, "The passing of Mr. Rickey is like losing a father."

Note: I hope you join me in influencing Valley Schools to commemorate the tremendous life of Branch Rickey. I would love to see a permanent display at the high school with appropriate information about this baseball and civil rights pioneer. He is a positive role model whose life surely inspires the hopes and dreams of young Americans today. I believe in honoring Rickey we would also inspire scores of young scholars and athletes to uphold the best principles of our schools and of our community. Would you join me in making this history part of our heritage? Let me know if you would support this effort. 




Saturday, March 9, 2019

Naloxone -- The Debate Over Moral Hazard




“There are certain people who might overdose more frequently than others, so maybe on an individual level, we’ll see a little bit of that. But I think if we’re talking about the population as a whole, I would not really be willing to say that the use of naloxone is making things worse. We’re just trying to save a life.”

– Jody B. Glance, MD, medical director of addiction medicine services at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

According to the National Institute on Drug Abuse, every day, more than 130 people in the United States die after overdosing on opioids. The misuse of and addiction to opioids – including prescription pain relievers, heroin, and synthetic opioids such as fentanyl – is a serious national crisis that affects public health as well as social and economic welfare.

According to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates for each fatal overdose, there are approximately 30 nonfatal overdoses – many of the cases appearing in emergency rooms across the country.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that the total "economic burden" of prescription opioid misuse alone in the United States is $78.5 billion a year, including the costs of healthcare, lost productivity, addiction treatment, and criminal justice involvement.

A “Miracle Treatment”

Naloxone (also known as Narcan) is a medication that can reverse an overdose caused by an opioid drug (heroin or prescription pain medications). When administered during an overdose, naloxone blocks the effects of opioids on the brain and quickly restores breathing.

Naloxone has been used safely by emergency medical professionals for more than 40 years and has only this one critical function: to reverse the effects of opioids in order to prevent overdose death. Naloxone has no potential for abuse.

In 2014, only 12 states allowed basic EMS staff to administer naloxone for overdose. Today, laws in every state allow the drug to be administered by anyone, from a physician to a family member.

One survey of a small number of community organizations in Delaware Country Pennsylvania, that used the 4-mg nasal spray found that first responders were successful at reviving about 98% of cases who went on to survive. In addition, a review of emergency medical services data from Massachusetts found that when given naloxone, 93.5% of people survived their overdose. The research looked at more than 12,000 dosages administered between July 1, 2013 and December 31, 2015. A year after their overdose, 84.3% of those who had been given the reversal drug were still alive.

The Debate

There is no doubt that naloxone saves lives. However, the increased availability of naloxone has engendered an ethical debate. Does the prospect of not dying from opioids make people more likely to use opioids? And, what about those who are revived multiple times? How many “second chances” for life should be given and at what cost? Some have even suggested there should be limits on how many times naloxone should be administered to the same person.

Critics of the life-saving medication say that it gives drug users a safety net and allows them to take repeated risks as they continue to get high. Opponents also argue that naloxone prevents users from feeling the consequences of their actions and this attitude is evidenced by the fact so many addicts fail to turn their lives around after the drug has been administered. They say using the treatment merely feeds the cycle of addiction.

Indeed, many users overdose more than once – some O.D. multiple times before learning their lesson. Each time, naloxone brings them back from the brink of death. Unfortunately, some never do shake addiction and lose their lives to repeated overdosing.

Researchers like Jennifer Doleac of the University of Wisconsin looked at the time period before and after different naloxone-access laws were put into place, such as providing legal immunity to people who prescribed or administered the drug and allowing anyone to buy naloxone in a pharmacy without a prescription.

Doleac found arrests related to the possession and sale of opioids went up, as did opioid-related ER visits. Meanwhile – and most worryingly – Doleach found there was no overall impact on the death rate. In fact, in the Midwest, the implementation of naloxone laws led to a 14 percent increase in opioid-related mortality, she found.

To Doleac, the administration of naloxone presents a moral hazard. In other words, “anytime you make something less dangerous, people are going to do more of it,” she said.

Note – Here is an example of an economic moral hazard. If you rent a car and opt for the maximum insurance coverage possible, damaging the vehicle does not have significant negative consequences. The insurance company will pay for repairs—or a replacement car—if something happens. In exchange for that coverage, you pay a price that seems fair, and everybody is satisfied.

Doleac's views have been criticized. She is an economist, and economists are known often to make “causal inferences”: They study natural experiments like law changes, use statistical tools to rule out other explanations and draw conclusions about cause and effect. (Doleac, in turn, criticized the methods used in the studies that came to different conclusions than her own.)

The Cost

According to www.statnews.com, a decade ago, a lifesaving dose of naloxone cost $1. Today, that same dose costs $150 for the nasal spray, a 150-fold increase. A naloxone auto-injector, approved in 2016, costs $4,500. Pharmaceutical innovation hasn’t driven up these prices. Opportunity has.

Bjanttac National Training and Technical Assistance Center Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice, says naloxone, depending on the specific form of naloxone used by the department, runs from a single naloxone rescue kit approximately $22-$60 for intranasal kits.

As a general rule, law enforcement training for overdose reversal programs is provided at no cost by a sister or a community agency. In some instances, costs for transportation and related training expenses may be covered by state grants.

As far as personnel costs, the time required for personnel to undergo training as part of law enforcement overdose reversal and prevention varies on case-by-case basis. Labor unions may consider opioid overdose reversal training as a change in work conditions.

The Surgeon General’s advisory explicitly addresses the importance of low out-of-pocket costs for naloxone. The reduction or elimination of consumer cost sharing to optimize naloxone distribution will require participation from health sciences companies, pharmaceutical benefit managers, and health plans.

Whose Morality?

To others like Lisa Campo-Engelstein, PhD, associate professor in the Alden March Bioethics Institute in department of obstetrics & gynecology at Albany Medical College, the moral hazard associated with naloxone is acceptable.

Campo-Engelstein concludes ... 

“The moral component here is that a lot of people think drug use is ‘bad’ and that people who use drugs are moral failures. Obviously, we want people to take responsibility for their actions, but we don’t deny people health care because they make ‘bad decisions.’”

Campo-Engelstein continued … ““We see this type of argument for a lot of public health problems. We see it with health education, with the HPV vaccine, and for any health issues that have a moral component.”

Lawrence H. Greenblatt, MD, Professor of Medicine and Community and Family Medicine at Duke Health, refutes those who believe naloxone presents a moral hazard. He says …

“They (the opposition) literally make the argument that by saving the lives of people who use injectable illicit drugs, you’re increasing the problem because there are more users. That’s a pretty unethical argument. It’s suggesting that if these drug users just got out of the way by dying of an overdose, we’d have less of a problem. It’s really ugly. It’s certainly hard to get behind that.”

Greenblatt adds that some of the data does not seem to be particularly strong or even applicable to the questions critics seek to answer. He says ...

“For example, they report a 1.4% drop in Google searches for the term ‘drug rehab’ after naloxone became available in a community. First of all, that’s a tiny reduction. Second of all, is tracking Google searches even a legitimate means of assessing peoples’ attitudes toward coming off opioids?”

Greenblatt also took issue with the fact that some studies have compared places where naloxone is widely available to places where it is not yet widely available. Naloxone’s effects likely depend on the availability of local drug treatment: when treatment is available to people who need help overcoming their addiction, broad naloxone access results in more beneficial effects.

Some clinicians maintain that rather than perpetuate risky behavior, naloxone can be used as an opportunity to disrupt this vicious cycle. When accompanied by resources and advice on rehabilitation, naloxone can be a valuable intervention point.

David A. Thomas, PhD, of the National Institute of Drug Abuse told Healio Family Medicine, concludes …

“When a patient goes to the ED, treatment should not just end with recovery from the overdose – there should be what we call a ‘warm handoff’ into the health care system, where they can get into treatment,” There are treatments out there that work. After a near-death experience, a patient might be particularly open to a teaching moment that could potentially change that behavior.”


Naloxone Understandings

Naloxone does not treat addiction, per se. However, naloxone is the only reversal agent for opioid overdose death in the community and in other situations where ventilatory support is not available. The alternative to the unresponsive, apneic opioid overdose patient is death.

One cannot assume drug users respond to incentives in any rational way. Addiction surely clouds judgment and makes policy in this area difficult. “Addiction is compulsive use despite the risk of harm,” says David A. Thomas, PhD, of the National Institute of Drug Abuse told Healio Family Medicine. Thomas continues …

“People who have opioid use disorder, or have a problem with any drugs of abuse, tend not to have enough executive function to have self-control and make good decisions about drugs. It’s really not a highly logical process - risk is just part of taking drugs.”

Jody B. Glance, MD, medical director of addiction medicine services at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, agrees with Thomas. She says, “When people are addicted, they’re going to use regardless of whether or not there is an antidote or a reversal agent, because their brains have really been hijacked and the addiction has taken over.”

Glance says ultimately naloxone’s ability to save lives is more important than any secondary moral concerns. She states ...

“Nobody wants to be an addict. Naloxone is going to save a life in the here-and-now and give that person another chance to enter a life of recovery, a life that they want to be living.”

Another rumor should be addressed – that of the drug being used as a “fix.” Naloxone is not sought out by patients for a "higher high." Naloxone availability laws haven't led to increase distribution or utilization. Stigmatizing addiction in this manner merely exacerbates the epidemic.

Critics of naloxone must understand that different policies concerning its use range in possible impact from trivial to significant. They also must not presume that a naloxone law’s passage has immediate effects. In practice, there is generally a significant lag between when laws are enacted and when they have their most powerful on-the-ground effects.

Any study of the use of naloxone must examine other key policies such as Medicaid expansion, targeted federal grants for the purchase of naloxone, and the implementation of parity regulations that require equal insurance coverage of services used to treat mental illnesses and substance use disorders. Richard G. Frank explains …

“Medicaid spending on outpatient naloxone prescriptions reached just under $20 million in 2016. Federal grants for naloxone purchases exceeded $20 million in 2015. In that same year, $100 million in federal grants were directed at high need community health centers.”

Remember the key phrase by Jody B. Glance: “We're just trying to save a life.” Harm reduction is based on the idea that the best way to help people suffering from drug addiction is to keep them as healthy as possible. One life saved is one more person who might just eventually find help and a way out. Others have. And many of them are now leading productive lives, yet were once thought to be hopeless and too addicted to recover.

We are presently taking baby steps to exit a major opioid health crisis. These advances are too recent to determine their long-term impact. I am in favor of giving every addict a chance (chances) at life until we do. Substance users deserve to live. We have at our disposal an overdose reversal medication that enables survival. It is immoral not to provide and use it. Any argument about a moral hazard fails when the victim of an opioid overdose is a loved one. 

References:

Jennifer Byrne “Increased Narcan availability evokes ethical debate.” Healio. April 2, 2018.

Tessie Castillo. “Should We Limit How Many Times Someone Is Saved with Naloxone?” The Fix. November 15, 2016.

Richard G. Frank, Keith Humphreys and Harold A. Pollack. “Does Naloxone Availability Increase Opioid Abuse? The Case For Skepticism.” Health Affairs. March 19, 2018.

Michael Hufford and Donald S. Burke. “The costs of heroin and naloxone: a tragic snapshot of the opioid crisis.” www.statnews.com. November 8, 2018.

Olga Khazan. “Why a Study on Opioids Ignited a Twitter Firestorm.” The Atlantic. March 14, 2018.

 Nadia Kounang. “Naloxone reverses 93% of overdoses, but many recipients don't survive a year.” CNN. October 30, 2017.

Ryan Marino, Brian Fullgraf and Jeremiah Escajeda. “Research Analysis: Conclusions about 'moral hazard' of naloxone not supported by methodology. Www.ems1.com. March 21, 2018.

National Institute on Drug Abuse. “Naloxone for Opioid Overdose: Life-Saving Science.” https://www.drugabuse.gov/publications/naloxone-opioid-overdose-life-saving-science/naloxone-opioid-overdose-life-saving-science.

Social Sciences Research Network “The Moral Hazard of Lifesaving Innovations: Naloxone Access, Opioid Abuse, and Crime.” https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3135264.
“What are the typical costs of a law enforcement overdose response program?” Bjanttac.


Friday, March 8, 2019

Things You Learn From the Paper: Portsmouth Times in the 1930s





Yes, 85 years is quite a span of time. One expects major changes over that period of time, and an exploration into the local paper reveals monumental differences between the 1930s and today.

In 1930, Portsmouth, Ohio had a population of 42,560 (+2.57% growth rate) and perhaps surprisingly Scioto County numbered 81,221 people (+29.23% growth rate).

In 2019, Portsmouth has a population of 20,443 (+0.48% growth rate) And recent census data shows 75,929 people in the county (-0.41 % growth rate)

Does it surprise you to know that while Portsmouth was a much larger industrial city in the 1930s, Scioto County was growing at a phenomenal rate? However, 85 years later Scioto County has 5,000 fewer inhabitants than it did in 1930, and Portsmouth's population has decreased by more than 50%.

People? What about the folks who lived in the area in the 30s? We know the years of the Great Depression of the 1930s were difficult for everyone. Even more disastrous was the flood of 1937. But, the 30s were grand times in other respects. It was the day of the greatest peak population and steady manufacturing growth.

In fact, Portsmouth was once known as the “Shoe Capital of the World.” Portsmouth’s shoe manufacturing history began long before in 1850, when Robert Bell came to Portsmouth and formed the Portsmouth Shoe Manufacturing Co. Portsmouth had many, many shoe factories in its history.

In January of 1877, the Irving Drew & Company was formed. It was reorganized in 1879 as Drew, Selby and Company. In 1927, Selby had become the eighth largest maker of shoes in the world. In the 1930s, over 2,000 workers were employed at Selby’s alone.

The population was of the 30s was very active and full of progressive hope. For example, during this time the Norfolk and Western Corporation that came into existence in 1982 built a grand, art deco passenger station on 16th and Findley streets in Portsmouth that provided a substantial entry to the city. Passengers used the station for access to both interstate and intrastate train lines, which provided basic transportation for many. Many of us have fond memories of the station and its storied service.

Also worth noting is that during this time period, the N&W’s Portsmouth Yards was the largest railroad yard in the world owned by a single railroad, and employed literally thousands of Scioto County residents.

A Long-Time Forgotten

A stroll through the Portsmouth Times of May 4, 1934; June 3, 1934; October 8, 1936,; and December 6, 1936, shows just how engaging folks were here in the 1930s. Their pastimes and forms of entertainment reveal interests that surprise present-day inhabitants.




Contract Bridge

How very popular a card game can be. In simpler times, a simple form of entertainment was all the rage. 

Contract bridge, one of the world's most popular partnership card games, may be dated from the early 16th-century invention of trick-taking games such as whist. Bridge evolved through the late 19th and early 20th centuries to form the present game. It was very popular. In 1925, Harold S. Vanderbilt, American multi-millionaire and three-time America's Cup winner, changed the course of bridge while on a cruise. He suggested that only tricks bid and made count toward game, with extra tricks counted as bonuses. These revised rules turned auction bridge into contract bridge.

In1931, the Culbertson Summary and Culbertson's Blue Book about bridge topped all book sales for the year, outselling such popular titles as Believe It or Not and Crossword Puzzles. That same year "The Battle of the Century" was held in New York City. The team captained by Ely Culbertson won by 8980 points.

Bridge was an ideal populist pastime for the Depression and the war years. It was sociable and challenging, yet the only cost was the price of a deck of cards. Couples took it up by the millions, and in the nineteen-forties, according to the Association of American Playing Card Manufacturers, the game was played in forty-four per cent of American homes.

During this period, Charles H. Goren, a Philadelphia lawyer who had applied himself to bridge in college after a young woman laughed at his poor play, displaced Culbertson as the nation’s preëminent authority.

Then came the decline in popularity. The drop can be attributed to other, more popular forms of recreational media such as television, video games, etc. And, bridge suffered from an image problem. While card games like poker conjure up images of hard-bitten men, scantily clad women, and long nights in Las Vegas, bridge evokes cucumber sandwiches and genteel parlor gatherings.




Serenading

A record serenade in Piketon. Nope, not just a pleasing tune beneath a lady's window. 

“Noising” or harassment of brides and grooms is an old custom in the United States. But the serenade, per se, was comprised of a crowd of friends who would awaken the bridal couple with “rough music and shouting, subjecting them to various indignities, and pestering them until the husband set up a treat.

Because noise was the key to gathering a large crowd, serenading parties worked to improve their racket-making capabilities. They often used noisemakers of various kinds to aid their merriment.

Upon gathering a crowd, the typical serenade party made its way to the home of the married couple. The group would stand out in front of the house making a racket until the married couple made an appearance.

“You wanted to have plenty of cigars and candy handy if you were hosting such a party,” said Robert Ripley. The bride and groom were expected to pass out these favors. Sometimes, if they could get into the house, the serenaders would “remake” or “short-sheet” the wedding bed. The emphasis was on creating as many vexations for the married couple as possible.

The serenades were of particular importance to the community because they brought together a significant number of local people who otherwise might have been busy attending to their local tasks. Although the married couple was the “target” of the senenade, the custom itself was communal in nature.

Serenading, according to Ripley, “gave out after the automobiles came in.” In Yankee Moderns: Folk Regional Identity in the Sawmill Valley of Western … (2000), Michael Hoberman says it is no coincidence that the practice of serenading faded at exactly the same time as other forms of regionally oriented folklife.




Dog and Pony Show

We all know that typically now, the term is used in a pejorative sense to connote disdain or distrust of the message being presented or the efforts undertaken to present it. But, the origins of the phrase are very real.

The term was originally used in the United States in the late-19th and early-20th centuries to refer to small traveling circuses that toured through small towns and rural areas. The name derives from the common use of performing dogs and ponies as the main attractions of the events.

This Portsmouth show was a performance by the famed Gentry Brothers. “Prof. Gentry's Famous Dog & Pony Show” was the most notorious act of its kind in history. It began when teenager Henry Gentry and his brothers started touring in 1886 with their act, originally entitled “Gentry’s Equine and Canine Paradox.” It started small, but evolved into a full circus show. The show operated so successfully that by 1897, it was traveling on 14 cars.

Some of the best known circus owners and managers of later years were graduates of the dog and pony shows, and some of the latter exhibitions were converted into full-fledged circuses as they flourished and expanded.

Henry B. Gentry quit school in 1886 at the age of 17 to join Professor Morris, self-styled “world’s greatest trained animal showman,” and from him, Gentry learned the art of domestic animal training. After a few years, he picked up a troupe of dogs from the streets of his home town, Bloomington, Indiana, and upon training them, made his debut in the Bloomington opera house.

The Gentry shows followed much the same pattern. There were military ponies, the Schneider dog family, the monkey fire department, a dog that walked a high wire, a high diving simian, the monkey horse doctor, and trained pigs and goats. As the shows grew, trained elephants were added.

Gentry advertised his show as “the only moral exhibition in the world under canvas. An educational festival patronized and endorsed by the elite of the land.”

In 1916, Gentry retired from business. But retirement was short, for H. B. Gentry accepted the management of the Sells-Floto circus and was owner of Sparks circus for a brief period, before he revived his original dog and pony show in 1931, traveling on 14 trucks.

Associated with him were his son, Robert, and his remaining brother, Frank, and he gathered together a staff that included several executives who worked for him back in the heyday of the Gentry regime. But the resurrection was ill-timed, coming as it did as the country was sinking deep into the throes of the depression and in 1934, the show disbanded.




Satires of 1934

What can you say about this risque show at the Westland Theatre? The “Satires of 1934” featured music, music, music … and a “bevy of beautiful girls” not to mention torch-singing Helene Brown and fan-dancing Francis Rudy. This extravagant Viola Holden production was booked for three days, which certainly attests to its popularity. I could find no additional information about the show or the performers, but doesn't this make you question any preconceived notions of the widespread Puritanical beliefs of the time?

The morality police, the arbiters of public taste, received a blow in March of 1930. A hung jury caused the judge to dismiss obscenity charges against Mae West's Pleasure Man. This is the same judge who broke a gavel, pounding to keep order and erase from the record a question by Miss West about how a police officer could tell if he were addressing a young lady or a man in drag.

When the show was raided, police arrested 52 members of the cast, several of whom were men in drag. This resulted in an amendment to the "Wales Padlock Law" in New York. In the future, only the writers and producers - and not the cast or crew of a show - would be held responsible for material deemed obscene or immoral.

During the Great Depression, shows distracted audiences with escapism, while also offering political commentary and social engagement. But, vaudeville took a significant stick in the eye. In 1925, there were approximately 1500 theaters in the vaudeville circuits; by 1930, only 300 were left.



Gridiron Warrior Impersonator

Speaking of liberal times, I was surprised to see this entry on the sports page of the Times. I guess we never really known history until we research and find new understandings of the past.

Clifford Glenn, a junior at Glenwood New Boston High School in 1936, had a rather unusual talent. As well as being a great football tackle, he was also a exceptional dancer and ... a female impersonator.

By the way, the New Boston Tigers regained the championship of the Big Six Conference that year. I'd say Clifford was no sissy on the gridiron.




Ali Baba's Spiritualistic Seance and Ghost Show

When viewing this ad, I was thinking about how such a show would be a Halloween hit today. After all, haunted houses and fields attracting huge holiday crowds are very popular now. Why not a séance? I smell a sellout.

Around the turn of the 20th century, the American public had a desperate, insatiable fascination with spiritualism and the promise of communication with dead family members. In 1929, a stage magician named Elwin-Charles Peck (who performed as El-Wyn) came up with an act that was at once very new and very old, and he presented it in a way no one had before. After all the other acts at whatever theater he was playing at the time went home for the night, he put on another show.

The El-Wyn's Midnite Spook Party opened with El-Wyn explaining to the audience that he was in contact with the spirit world, warning them they should be prepared to see some strange, even terrifying things over the course of the next hour. He then did a few of his standard tricks, slowly working in some of the same tricks used by the spiritualist charlatans Houdini had unmasked over the previous 30 years.

Objects moved mysteriously, eerie sounds came out of nowhere, and at the close of the show the theater went completely dark as the spirits of the dead appeared and vanished onstage and flew over the heads of the audience. What he was offering, at heart, was a seance.

The traveling show was such a huge success (playing mostly to lively audiences in their late teens and early 20s) that it quickly spawned dozens of imitators. It was the birth of a new entertainment form. Given these other shows also tended to start at midnight, they came to be known generally as Midnight Spook Shows, Midnight Ghost Shows, or, later, Midnight Monster Shows.

Author Jim Knipfel in the article “Midnight Spook Shows: A Brief History” explains ...

“Considering the level of often raucous audience participation, the Midnight Spook Shows can in many ways be considered the direct predecessors to the Midnight Movie phenomenon which began in the early ‘70s (just as the final spook shows were fading away) with films like The Rocky Horror Picture Show.

“Cheap as the tricks were, the shows worked thanks to the power of suggestion, imagination, and anticipation. Tell people beforehand that spiders will drop on them or monsters will grab them in the darkness and, well, they will. The real innovation the Bakers brought to the form was clever, gimmicky promotions. Mini graveyards popped up in public places in the small towns where the show was about to open, newspaper and radio ads promised everything from “King Kong live onstage!” to contests where someone in the audience could win “a real dead body!” (it turned out to be a frozen chicken). Spooky trailers plugging the show ran in the theaters for weeks beforehand, and fake protest groups showed up outside the show to denounce the depravity of it all.”