Showing posts with label government control. Show all posts
Showing posts with label government control. Show all posts

Monday, April 19, 2010

Living In a New World?



Brave New World

"...there will be within the next generation or so a pharmacological method of making people love their servitude, and producing a kind of painless concentration camp for entire societies, so that people will in fact have their liberties taken away from them but will rather enjoy it, because they will be distracted from any desire to rebel by propaganda, brainwashing or brainwashing enhanced by pharmacological methods." ~Aldous Huxley, (1959)


Published almost eighty years ago, Brave New World (1932) by Aldous Huxley remains a classic anti-Utopian novel. In the book, a futuristic ideal world is portrayed: one where human values are eliminated. The characters in Brave New World are all a part of a totalitarian state. They are free from war, hatred, poverty, disease and pain. Each one of the characters are hurt and altered by the huge consumption of a drug; since no one thinks questions or believes, all emotions are not real and any conscious reaction is susceptible to alteration by the effects of the drug,

In Brave New World, mankind exists in an institutional form of happiness, managed by the World State that uses "Community, Identity, Stability as its motto. The World State is a peaceful, stable global society. (Specifically because the population is permanently limited to no more than two billion people) 

The World State is built upon the principles of Henry Ford's assembly line of mass production, homogeneity, predictability, and consumption of disposable consumer goods. At the same time as the World State lacks any supernatural-based religions, Ford himself is revered as a deity, and characters celebrate Ford Day and swear oaths by his name (e.g., "By Ford!"). 


Reproduction is totally controlled through genetic engineering as people are bred into a rigid class system of five castes (The lower castes are treated to chemical interference to cause arrested development in intelligence or physical growth.) and designed for specific purposes. Concepts such as family, freedom, love and culture are considered particularly grotesque as their sacrifice is the price of universal happiness. For example, children, controlled by the state, are encouraged to play "Erotic Play," in which they explore one another's bodies to prevent any feelings of guilt about sex.

In the World State, people typically die at 60, having maintained good health and youthfulness their whole life. Death isn't feared because anyone reflecting upon it is reassured by the knowledge that everyone is happy, and that society goes on. Since no one has family anyway, they have no ties to mourn.

Maturity is totally controlled by State conditioning that reinforces happiness with the roles for which society created the citizens. They, thus, work without complaint or incident. Besides work, the rest of their lives is devoted to pursuit of pleasure through promiscuous sex without remance (repeated in the maxim "everyone belongs to everyone else"), recreation such as the "feelies" (a sensory experience like Cinerama on tactile steroids), material possessions, and, of course, soma. Soma is the cure-all of government choice.


Soma acts as a hallucinogen that takes users on enjoyable, hangover-free "holidays." It is said also to replicate religious experiences, eliminating the need for religion.Yet, soma is more akin to a tranquillizer or to an opiate - or even to a psychic anesthetizing SSRI (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors) like Prozac - than to a truly life-transforming elixir.

The lower caste people get their soma-ration every day and swallow it although it shortens their lives. With soma the citizens of the brave new world can compensate emotional stress. If they feel sorrow, pain, anger, jealousy or other negative emotions, the universal solution always is soma. So, soma is a remedy to reduce aggression and discontent to a minimum, and it helps the State to keep the social stability in the brave new world.

Another purpose for soma usage is for sick and dying people. In hospitals patients get huge concentrations of soma to ease their suffering and pain especially before death. Soma makes death as pleasant as possible for the sufferers. But, the consumption of soma also causes these patients not to be able to think clearly any more, and they stay drugged until they are dead. Of course, exaggerated consumption of soma can lead to the premature death of people who are otherwise well. Overdose is possible without precaution.

Some inhabitants of the World State do take huge portions of soma just to repress memories of their past bad experiences in the less-civilized world of the primitive reservation, where people preserve the outdated ways of the old culture. This is an extreme example of how people escape the reality of the World State by taking soma. But there are far more other drugs offered by the Internal and External Secretion Trust, which is in charge of hormones and medicines to keep people fit, young-looking and happy. 

 

Huxley's View 





Tragically, Brave New World, a satirical piece of fiction, has come to serve as the false symbol for any regime of universal happiness. The drug soma provides a mindless, inauthentic "imbecile happiness" - escapism which makes people comfortable with their lack of freedom. The drug heightens suggestibility, leaving its users vulnerable to government propaganda. Soma is just a narcotic that raises "a quite impenetrable wall between the actual universe and their minds." Their pleasure increases ignorance of self.

Huxley is warning us about becoming duped by science. The majority of people in the book are victims of propaganda and misinformation in their hedonistic society. He shows us how zombified addicts, willing to risk all individuality and self-initiated intelligence, can become slaves -- slaves to a society that freely dispenses pleasure or slaves to a state that completely controls individual freedoms through government. And, the cost in human life is terribly high in either or both cases. What appears Utopian living is anything but such a free and happy existence.

So, what brave new world awaits us in a free-market of psychotropic drugs? Will new medical drug cartels leave smuggling and operating "pill mills" for the Net as a global drug-delivery system? Opiates are quickly becoming the soma of the masses. Many would gladly exchange years of their lives for worry-free, pleasurable lives. These are people who would bend to governmental control for materialistic gain.

As trends of fiction have become obvious traits of 21st century reality, we are confronted with considering  certain limits imposed upon us by the state and by big business. Chief among them is the all too convenient access to prescription drugs and the loss of security in our neighborhoods due to the enormous volume of drug dealing and all the crime and tragedy that accompanies it. We must make the government change the laws in our favor, make the government invest in sufficient law enforcement, and make the government instill programs that effectively curb skyrocketing addiction. This is fact, not fiction.



Social critic Neil Postman (Amusing Ourselves To Death, 1983) finds these startling comparisons as he contrasts America today with the World State in Huxley's Brave New World


1. Huxley feared was that there would be no reason to ban a book, for there would be no one who wanted to read one.

2. Huxley said of information, he feared those who would give us so much that we would be reduced to passivity and egoism.

3. Huxley feared the truth would be drowned in a sea of irrelevance.

4. Huxley feared that what we desire will ruin us.

 

Wednesday, June 17, 2009

Knowing Your Limitations

Most adults pride themselves on "knowing their limitations." They believe their acquired skills, intellect, and habits have been internalized and evaluated through experience to set a unique base of learned personal standards applicable to ever-changing environments. People apply their concept of limitations to simple or complex activities such as driving (five miles over the limit), drinking (one drink an hour), working (40 hour work weeks), or relationships (one at a time). The old adage "Everything in moderation. Nothing to excess" seems to be a reasonable guide when people's limitations have yet to be tested. But what about excess? Might it have any redeeming qualities? W. Somerset Maugham once quipped,"Excess on occasion is exhilarating. It prevents moderation from acquiring the deadening effect of a habit." Certainly, Thomas Paine and Patrick Henry would have been considered radicals during their time. So, it's safe to assume most believe nothing is wrong with being a radical for the right cause or breaking limitations in the face of harm or injustice. Personal limitations do not always conform with limitations demanded by government or limitations demanded by present society. I, personally, believe so many Americans have been molded into a mainstream mentality of moderation that very little "above board" pride in individual rights is exhibited. Fearing they may offend someone else by displaying anything but "namby-pamby" behavior, Americans prefer to whisper alternate views to trusted individuals in private. Public free expression is suffering the consequences while muted behavior breeds distrust. Knowing one's limitations is now, more than ever, trusted to those who set the public rules of conformation while looking down from the "catbird seat." An individual, equally good alternative of limitation, in the meantime, is dismissed or criticized as dangerously subversive. So, many Americans tend to cower and wait silently for the next restriction. Being forced to conform to any one set of standards can prove dangerous, indeed. Reality is often foreshadowed in fiction. In Ray Bradbury's classic Fahrenheit 451, the fire chief, Captain Beatty explains why pleasure and non-thinking are desirable goals for society. As the fire departments in this futuristic society burn books to prevent the spread of individual thought and action, Beatty cites historical evidence of the need for forced censorship due to the supposed harm to the population of any diverse thought. “Bigger the population, the more minorities. Don’t step on the toes of the dog lovers, the cat lovers, doctors, lawyers, merchants, chiefs, Mormons, Baptists, Unitarians, second-generation Chinese, Swedes, Italians, Germans, Texans, Brooklynites, Irishmen, people from Oregon or Mexico. The people in this book, this play, this TV serial are not meant to represent any actual painters, cartographers, mechanics anywhere. The bigger your market, Montag, the less you handle controversy, remember that!… Authors full of evil thoughts, lock up your typewriters. They did.” — Captain Beatty, Fahrenheit 451 Beatty, explaining the history of censorship and periods of education further states, "Out of the nursery into the college and back to the nursery; there's your intellectual pattern for the past five centuries or more." He defends the moral aims of censorship as he continues, "Not everyone born free and equal, as the Constitution says, but everyone made equal. Each man the image of every other; then all are happy, for there are no mountains to make them cower, to judge themselves against." How much limitation in 2009 is set by governmental and liberal philosophy eerily similar to the fictional world created by Ray Bradbury? People have gone overboard with their insane, media and social driven definitions of total acceptance and justice for all. (Justice for the rich? The famous? The infamous? The meat-producing animal?) Despite the many good outcomes associated with "namby-pamby" legislation and beliefs, people must never be limited in their rights to set intelligent, well-meaning, unique limitations on their own thoughts and behaviors. In conclusion, the poem "Namby-Pamby" was written in 1725 by Henry Carey as a satire of Ambrose Philips, a Whig writer. Then, praising or condemning Philips was a political as much as a poetic matter. The poem sold well and has been used as children's literature since Carey's day. Namby-Pamby
"All ye Poets of the Age!
All ye Witlings of the Stage!
Learn your Jingles to reform!
Crop your Numbers and Conform:
Let your little Verses flow
Gently, Sweetly, Row by Row:
Let the Verse the Subject fit;
Little Subject, Little Wit.
Namby-Pamby is your Guide;
Albion's Joy, Hibernia's Pride." -Henry Carey