“Give me
your tired and your poor who can stand on their own two feet
and who
will not become a public charge,”
– Ken
Cuccinelli, Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration
Ken Cuccinelli, former
Virginia attorney general and Trump's choice for acting director of
the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, has long held a
hard-line stance against immigration and asylum policies. President
Trump tapped him in June, bringing him to the helm of an agency he
had never worked in.
Cuccinelli announced a new
regulation Monday (August 12, 2019) that targets legal immigration.
The rule denies green cards and visas to immigrants if they use –
or are deemed likely to need – federal, state and local government
benefits including food stamps, housing vouchers and Medicaid. The
change stands to impact hundreds of thousands of immigrants who come
to the United States legally every year.
"If they don't have
future prospects of being legal permanent residents without welfare,
that will be counted against them," Cuccinelli said.
"All immigrants who
can stand on their own two feet, self-sufficient, pull themselves up
by their bootstraps," would be welcome, he added.
Asked if that changes the
definition of the American Dream, Cuccinelli said, "No one has a
right to become an American who isn't born here as an American."
Then he clarified. "It
is a privilege to become an American, not a right for anybody who is
not already an American citizen, that's what I was referring to …
It does not change what makes America exceptional. We invite people
to come here and join us as a privilege.”
In speaking about the
original words on the Statue of Liberty, Cuccinelli said the language
on the 1903 plaque by Emma Lazarus – “Give me your tired, your
poor, / Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, / The wretched
refuse of your teeming shore./ Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost
to me – must now also mean as long as you can stand “on your own
two feet.”
Of course, many understand
this charge to be a sweeping attempt to stem immigration and favor
wealthy migrants. Leon Fresco, a former deputy assistant attorney
general in the Obama administration, said the case could wind up in
the U.S. Supreme Court.
"I also expect
lawsuits from individuals who say that, at the end of the day, if
Congress provided certain benefits to be accessible by certain groups
of immigrants, that meant that they did not want them then banned
under the public charge rule," Fresco said.
Rumors that the Trump
administration was considering the regulation already led to a
chilling effect on immigrants looking to put down roots through legal
and permanent residency. Public health and social service providers
report that immigrants are worried about seeking medical and housing
aid for themselves and their children, who may be U.S. citizens.
“Under this rule,
children will go hungry; families will go without medical care. I am
committed to defending all of New York’s communities, which is why
I intend to sue the Trump Administration over this egregious rule,”
New York Attorney General Letitia James (D) said in a statement.
CBS White House
correspondent Weijia Jiang tweeted: “My dad came to the US with
$40. My mom and I followed with $0. We were tired. We were poor. But
this beautiful country helped us become Americans.”
"The law on immigration and welfare is clear: When a person becomes
a legal permanent resident of the United States, he or she is
required to pay taxes but they are ineligible to receive
almost any welfare benefits until they have resided in
the country for at least five years."
-- Congressional Research Service
With his attack on
immigration, I doubt if Cuccinelli knows much at all about welfare.
Allow me to share some key facts …
The vast majority of
Americans receiving one of the six major forms of government
assistance are children below the age of 18.
Nearly half of all
children in the U.S.—46.7 percent—received some form of
government assistance at some point during 2012. The 2015 report by
the U.S. Census Bureau also shows that children participate for
longer durations in these programs than adults. From 2009 to 2012,
more than half of all children who received government assistance did
so for somewhere between 37 and 48 months.
So when one imagines a
welfare recipient, that person should not be an adult sitting on
a couch before a television. That person should be a child in need.
The vast majority of
people enrolled in Medicaid—77 percent—were in a household where
at least one adult was employed (full- or part-time).
This data analysis was
performed by the Kaiser Family Foundation in 2015. A full 37 million
enrollees, more than three in five, were members of households with
at least one full-time worker.
On average 39 percent of
women receiving Aid to Families with Dependent Children benefits were
also employed. $152.8 billion is spent each year in the United States
on welfare programs to support working families with low wages. 52
percent of fast food workers with at least one family member rely on
at least one poverty assistance program.
Though rates of
participation are higher among people of color, white people comprise
the greatest number of recipients when measured by race.
Given the population of
the U.S. in 2012 and the annual rate of participation by race
reported by the U.S. Census Bureau in 2015, about 35 million white
people participated in one of the six major government assistance
programs that year. That's about 11 million more than the 24 million
Hispanics and Latinos who participated and considerably more than the
20 million black people who received government aid.
In fact, most white people
receiving benefits are enrolled in Medicaid. According to an analysis
by the Kaiser Family Foundation, 42 percent of non-elderly Medicaid
enrollees in 2015 were white. However, U.S. Department of Agriculture
data for 2013 shows that the largest racial group participating in
SNAP is also white people, at more than 40 percent.
Spending on the Social
Safety Net is just 10 Percent of the federal budget.
Many Republicans have
claimed that social services expenditures are out of control and
crippling the federal budget, but these programs accounted for just
10 percent of federal spending in 2015.
The number of families
receiving welfare has dropped.
Contrary to President
Trump's claims about welfare, far fewer families in need receive
support from this program today than did when welfare reform was
enacted in 1996. The Center for Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP)
reported in 2016 that since welfare reform was enacted and Aid for
Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) was replaced by TANF, the
program has served progressively fewer families.
Many receiving
government assistance are short-term recipients.
While most people who
received government assistance between 2009 and 2012 were long-term
participants, about a third were short-term participants who received
aid for a year or less, according to a 2015 U.S. Census Bureau
report.
A myth: “Welfare
makes people lazy.”
Derek Thompson, staff
writer for The Atlantic, says, “Welfare isn’t just a moral
imperative to raise the living standards of the poor. It’s also a
critical investment in the health and future careers of low-income
kids.” Government aid relieves low-income children of the
psychological and physiological stresses that get in the way of
embracing those very ideals. Thompson continues: “Welfare is so
much more than a substitute for a paycheck. It is a remedy for the
myriad burdens of childhood poverty, which give children the
opportunity to become exactly the sort of healthy and striving adults
celebrated by both political parties.”
From Thompson's research
about “busting the myth” ...
“Many economists have
for decades argued that this orthodoxy is simply wrong—that wisely
designed anti-poverty programs, like the Earned Income Tax Credit,
actually increase labor participation. And now, across the world, a
fleet of studies are converging on the consensus that even radical
welfare programs—including basic-income programs and what are
called conditional cash transfers—don’t make people any less
productive …
“Studies have found
that such programs can increase working hours and earnings,
particularly when the beneficiaries are required to attend classes
that teach specific trades or general business skills.
“One of the latest
studies on the subject found that Medicaid has 'little if any' impact
on employment or work hours. In research based in Canada and the
U.S., the economist Ioana Marinescu at the University of Pennsylvania
has found that even when basic-income programs do reduce working
hours, adults don’t typically stay home to, say, play video games;
instead, they often use the extra cash to go back to school or hold
out for a more desirable job …
“American adults
whose families had access to prenatal coverage under Medicaid have
lower rates of obesity, higher rates of high-school graduation, and
higher incomes as adults than those from similar households in states
without Medicaid, according to a 2015 paper from the economists Sarah
Miller and Laura R. Wherry. Another paper found that children covered
by Medicaid expansions went on to earn higher wages and require less
welfare assistance as adults.”
(Derek
Thompson. “Busting the Myth of ‘Welfare Makes People Lazy.’”
The
Atlantic. March 8, 2018.)
The American Dream may be
a privilege; however, it is evident some close-minded government
officials have no intention of offering this privilege to those
without health, resources, and “better ingredients” to add to the
melting pot – constituents of immigration who would assimilate
instantly in a privileged, white world.
Emma Lazarus – the
author of “The New Colossus” (1883), the poem that adorns the
pedestal of the Statue of Liberty – did not intend the inspiring
verse to mean “send us your best.” Instead, her poem clearly
denotes “send us those who will most appreciate liberty,
opportunity, and plenty.” The verse continues with a denial of
nationalist narratives that are based on historical claims of ancient
possession: “Keep, ancient lands, your storied pomp!”
The statue, itself, is not
meant to be standing guard, like the forbidding, martial masculinity
of the Colossus of Rhodes, but instead to be lighting the harbor as
the “Mother of Exiles” – a gendered woman who cries out with
her “silent lips” symbolically extolling the liberal values of
hospitality, diversity, and inclusion. The statue was the first great
U.S. landmark that immigrants arriving in the United States would see
– a beacon of hope for a better life.
For Emma Lazarus,
Bartholdi’s statue was not a neoclassical monument to shared
Franco-American values, but a defiant symbol of American
exceptionalism steeped in Hebraic values. Lazarus was involved in
charitable work for refugees. She began to advocate on behalf of
indigent Jewish immigrants.
At Ward's Island, Lazarus
worked as an aide for Jewish immigrants who had been detained by
Castle Garden immigration officials. She was deeply moved by the
plight of the Russian Jews she met there and these experiences
influenced her writing. In 1883, she founded the Society for the
Improvement and Colonization of East European Jews. She also argued
for the creation of a Jewish homeland
This “public charge”
idea is the latest bigoted move by Ken Cuccinelli, who has sought to
prohibit undocumented immigrants from attending universities, to
repeal birthright citizenship, and to force employees to speak
English in the workplace.
What kind of man is
Cuccinelli? He also opposes homosexuality while describing homosexual
acts as "against nature and are harmful to society." He
rejects the scientific consensus on climate change, and he has been a
strong advocate of the abstinence-only sex education programs with
state funding.
During the Virginia
Gubernatorial campaign (2013), Cuccinelli scored a miserable 10 (of
14) “Mostly False” claims in PolitiFact poling. Consider this
score against Virginia senate candidate Democrat Tim Kaine’s
average at 3.58.
Ken Cuccinelli is an
anti-immigrant extremist who once compared immigration to pest
control and has a history of anti-Muslim and anti-LGBT positions.
Over the years, he has clearly demonstrated his loathing as a state
senator and attorney general. As the head of the Senate Conservatives
Fund (2015), Cuccinelli told talk show host Steve Deace that America
is being “invaded” by immigrants “one person at a time” –
language that Trump has used to justify the detention of refugees and
families in inhumane conditions at the border.
The Mother of Exiles, the
enduring symbol of American freedom and liberty to immigrants from
all nations, clearly makes no distinction about the financial
independence of those seeking asylum. Lady Liberty, the statue in New
York harbor, found her meaningful voice because of the Emma
Lazarus's sonnet, "The New Colossus," written in its honor.
Especially in the 1920s,
when the United States began to restrict immigration, the words of
Lazarus took on much deeper meaning. The mother's plea to “give me
the wretched refuse of your teeming shore” is a poignant charge for
humanity, not for exclusion. To twist the representation of this
important figure is unthinkable. Her torch is a symbol of
enlightenment. It lights the way to freedom showing all the path to
liberty. Even the statue's official name represents her most
important representation – "Liberty Enlightening the World.”
No comments:
Post a Comment