Structural Racism in the
United States is defined as “the normalization and legitimization
of an array of dynamics – historical, cultural, institutional and
interpersonal – that routinely advantage whites while producing
cumulative and chronic adverse outcomes for people of color.”
Structural racism is a
system of hierarchy and inequity, primarily characterized by white
supremacy – the preferential treatment, privilege and power for
white people at the expense of Black, Latino, Asian, Pacific
Islander, Native American, Arab and other racially oppressed people.
Key indicators of
structural racism are inequalities in power, access, opportunities,
treatment, and policy impacts and outcomes, whether they are
intentional or not. It involves the reinforcing effects of multiple
institutions and cultural norms, past and present, continually
producing new, and re-producing old forms of racism.
A study led by School of
Public Health researchers (2018) found states with a greater degree
of structural racism, particularly residential segregation, have
higher racial disparities in fatal police shootings of unarmed
victims.
The association between
levels of structural racism and the racial disparity in the shooting
of unarmed victims by police held even after controlling for the rate
of arrests of black individuals in a state, and for the overall rate
of fatal police shootings of black victims.
The study suggests that
this police shootings are not simply about the actions of
individuals, but about the actions of all of society. The researchers
are hopeful that reframing this from an individual to a societal
problem will pave the way for a meaningful discussion about
institutional racism. Study co-author Anita Knopov, a pre-doctoral
fellow at SPH, reports …
“This suggests that
the higher rates of fatal police shootings of unarmed black victims
are not merely a result of more interactions between police officers
and black suspects. Instead, our results indicate that in some states
there is a systematically different response based on the race of the
suspect.”
Aldina Mesic B.S. Et al, The Relationship Between
Structural Racism and Black-White Disparities in Fatal Police
Shootings at the State Level. Journal of the National Medical
Association, Volume 110, Issue 2, April 2018, Pages 106-116
Surprisingly, the study
revealed the highest black-white ratios of police killings are
concentrated in the Midwest, as are broader disparities in outcomes
and living conditions like segregation and economic status. Among the
states with the highest disparities in black versus white shooting
victims and the highest racism index scores are Wisconsin and
Illinois — home, respectively, to Milwaukee and Chicago, two of the
most segregated cities in the country.
The study also found that
overall, unarmed black civilians are more than four and a half times
more likely to be shot dead by the police than unarmed white
civilians. The data also includes instances in which law enforcement
maintains a victim was armed at the time of a shooting, even when
that fact is disputed – which could mean a potential undercount in
the rate of police shootings of the unarmed victims.
Structural racism has deep
roots. Racial differentiation has been created, and is constantly
being re-created, to serve a social and or economic purpose. It is
maintained through social, legal and political controls (from slavery
to Jim Crow laws to ghettoization to uses of ‘law and order’ and
the criminal justice system, restrictive immigration policies, etc.).
We must examine the modern existence of this racism and vow to attack its core causes, not simply keep score of injustice after injustice. Society needs a wake-up call to action, not another reaction with fleeting regrets.
“Systemic and
structural injustice is violence. What we often look at is the
violence that erupts on the streets. Well, that’s a response to the
violent lives in which people have been forced to live. That’s what
we have to begin to do – to look at the systemic and structural
racism, period, which means dismantling some of these things,
changing laws, changing policies, etc. So that’s one level.
“And then we talk
about this sort of collective consciousness and what happens when, as
President Obama put it, Johnny and Jamal go to apply for a job. And
we know the likelihood is that Johnny is going to get it and not
Jamal. We have to look at that.
– Kelly
Brown Douglas, African-American Episcopal priest
No comments:
Post a Comment